模拟暴力关系的价值。

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL
David Katerndahl, Sandra Burge, Maria Del Pilar Montanez Villacampa, Johanna Becho, Jasmine Rodriguez
{"title":"模拟暴力关系的价值。","authors":"David Katerndahl,&nbsp;Sandra Burge,&nbsp;Maria Del Pilar Montanez Villacampa,&nbsp;Johanna Becho,&nbsp;Jasmine Rodriguez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a scar on human society. Growing evidence demonstrates that relationships involving IPV and women's decisionmaking about violence represent complex phenomena, best studied as complex adaptive systems. Unfortunately, that complexity limits our ability to fully understand it. This paper presents findings from a series of agent-based models (ABMs) that were created from studies involving multiple time series of couples' daily reports of violence, perceptions and behaviors. To identify potential influencing variables, we modeled the impact that random stress and intentional behavior of the women could have on men's violence and stalking. ABM models of IPV noted the lack of violence at baseline without influence, and found that three variable parameters (Distance-Distance+, HerViolence-HerViolence+, Distance-Distance-) accounted for most patterns of violence development. Random stress and arguments had little effect and the nature of the alcoholviolence relationship remained unclear, however, her violence could increase his violence and stalking. One important difference between ABMs was the importance of the persistence of her concern about the effects of violence on children. Although only modeled in the second ABM, it proved critical to results. When modeling women's decision-making, her abstinence from arguments, alcohol use and violence had no effect on whether to seek help, take legal action or leave; random stress and her daily violence did not affect seeking counseling. However, daily arguments, forgiveness and heavy alcohol use did impact actiontaking, increasing counseling, legal action and leaving generally. The addition of catastrophe equations could alter these outcomes, resulting in more counseling but less legal action. In addition, children are very important when considering decision-making; concern for children affects violence while number of children affects decision-making. In conclusion, ABM can yield important insights into IPV and have clinical implications. It can provide greater understanding of the phenomenon and allow us to test the nature of correlations. (i.e., between alcohol use and violence). ABM can clarify the inherent complexity within violent couples and facilitate sense-making. Finally, it can allow clinicians to test interventions in vitro without risk to vulnerable women.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":"26 3","pages":"315-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of Modeling Violent Relationships.\",\"authors\":\"David Katerndahl,&nbsp;Sandra Burge,&nbsp;Maria Del Pilar Montanez Villacampa,&nbsp;Johanna Becho,&nbsp;Jasmine Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a scar on human society. Growing evidence demonstrates that relationships involving IPV and women's decisionmaking about violence represent complex phenomena, best studied as complex adaptive systems. Unfortunately, that complexity limits our ability to fully understand it. This paper presents findings from a series of agent-based models (ABMs) that were created from studies involving multiple time series of couples' daily reports of violence, perceptions and behaviors. To identify potential influencing variables, we modeled the impact that random stress and intentional behavior of the women could have on men's violence and stalking. ABM models of IPV noted the lack of violence at baseline without influence, and found that three variable parameters (Distance-Distance+, HerViolence-HerViolence+, Distance-Distance-) accounted for most patterns of violence development. Random stress and arguments had little effect and the nature of the alcoholviolence relationship remained unclear, however, her violence could increase his violence and stalking. One important difference between ABMs was the importance of the persistence of her concern about the effects of violence on children. Although only modeled in the second ABM, it proved critical to results. When modeling women's decision-making, her abstinence from arguments, alcohol use and violence had no effect on whether to seek help, take legal action or leave; random stress and her daily violence did not affect seeking counseling. However, daily arguments, forgiveness and heavy alcohol use did impact actiontaking, increasing counseling, legal action and leaving generally. The addition of catastrophe equations could alter these outcomes, resulting in more counseling but less legal action. In addition, children are very important when considering decision-making; concern for children affects violence while number of children affects decision-making. In conclusion, ABM can yield important insights into IPV and have clinical implications. It can provide greater understanding of the phenomenon and allow us to test the nature of correlations. (i.e., between alcohol use and violence). ABM can clarify the inherent complexity within violent couples and facilitate sense-making. Finally, it can allow clinicians to test interventions in vitro without risk to vulnerable women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"315-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力是人类社会的一道伤疤。越来越多的证据表明,涉及IPV和妇女对暴力的决策的关系是复杂的现象,最好作为复杂的适应系统来研究。不幸的是,这种复杂性限制了我们完全理解它的能力。本文介绍了一系列基于主体的模型(ABMs)的研究结果,这些模型是通过对夫妻日常暴力、观念和行为报告的多个时间序列进行研究而创建的。为了确定潜在的影响变量,我们模拟了随机压力和女性故意行为对男性暴力和跟踪行为的影响。IPV的ABM模型注意到在基线上没有暴力而不受影响,并发现三个可变参数(距离-距离+、HerViolence-HerViolence+、距离-距离-)解释了大多数暴力发展模式。随机的压力和争吵几乎没有影响,酒精暴力关系的性质尚不清楚,然而,她的暴力可能会增加他的暴力和跟踪。ABMs和ABMs之间的一个重要区别是,她始终关注暴力对儿童的影响。虽然只在第二个ABM中建模,但事实证明,它对结果至关重要。在为妇女的决策建模时,她不与人争吵、不酗酒和不使用暴力对是否寻求帮助、采取法律行动或离开没有影响;随机的压力和她的日常暴力并没有影响她寻求咨询。然而,日常争吵、原谅和大量饮酒确实会影响采取行动、增加咨询、采取法律行动和普遍离开。灾难方程式的加入可能会改变这些结果,导致更多的咨询,但更少的法律行动。此外,在考虑决策时,孩子是非常重要的;对儿童的关注影响暴力,而儿童人数影响决策。总之,ABM可以对IPV提供重要的见解,并具有临床意义。它可以让我们更好地理解这种现象,并允许我们测试相关性的本质。(即,在使用酒精和暴力之间)。ABM可以澄清暴力夫妻内在的复杂性,并有助于理解。最后,它可以让临床医生在体外测试干预措施,而不会给弱势妇女带来风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value of Modeling Violent Relationships.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a scar on human society. Growing evidence demonstrates that relationships involving IPV and women's decisionmaking about violence represent complex phenomena, best studied as complex adaptive systems. Unfortunately, that complexity limits our ability to fully understand it. This paper presents findings from a series of agent-based models (ABMs) that were created from studies involving multiple time series of couples' daily reports of violence, perceptions and behaviors. To identify potential influencing variables, we modeled the impact that random stress and intentional behavior of the women could have on men's violence and stalking. ABM models of IPV noted the lack of violence at baseline without influence, and found that three variable parameters (Distance-Distance+, HerViolence-HerViolence+, Distance-Distance-) accounted for most patterns of violence development. Random stress and arguments had little effect and the nature of the alcoholviolence relationship remained unclear, however, her violence could increase his violence and stalking. One important difference between ABMs was the importance of the persistence of her concern about the effects of violence on children. Although only modeled in the second ABM, it proved critical to results. When modeling women's decision-making, her abstinence from arguments, alcohol use and violence had no effect on whether to seek help, take legal action or leave; random stress and her daily violence did not affect seeking counseling. However, daily arguments, forgiveness and heavy alcohol use did impact actiontaking, increasing counseling, legal action and leaving generally. The addition of catastrophe equations could alter these outcomes, resulting in more counseling but less legal action. In addition, children are very important when considering decision-making; concern for children affects violence while number of children affects decision-making. In conclusion, ABM can yield important insights into IPV and have clinical implications. It can provide greater understanding of the phenomenon and allow us to test the nature of correlations. (i.e., between alcohol use and violence). ABM can clarify the inherent complexity within violent couples and facilitate sense-making. Finally, it can allow clinicians to test interventions in vitro without risk to vulnerable women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信