通过尺骨入路比较腕关节内置入针的准确性:尸体研究

Q3 Medicine
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Sierra Phillips, Megan Lameka, Christopher Beaumont, Nileshkumar Chaudhari, Jared Halstrom, James Rush Jones, Nicholas A Andrews, Ashish Shah
{"title":"通过尺骨入路比较腕关节内置入针的准确性:尸体研究","authors":"Sierra Phillips, Megan Lameka, Christopher Beaumont, Nileshkumar Chaudhari, Jared Halstrom, James Rush Jones, Nicholas A Andrews, Ashish Shah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-articular injections are a standard therapy and diagnostic tool for a variety of wrist conditions. Accurate needle placement is crucial for proper therapeutic benefit and prevention of complications. While some studies claim accurate needle placement requires imaging, others conclude that anatomical guidance is sufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of intra-articular wrist needle placement with the ulnocarpal approach across differing levels of training using clinical anatomy alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen fresh-frozen, above-elbow cadaveric specimens were used. Intra-articular needle placement into the wrist via an ulnocarpal approach was attempted by nine study participants: two interns, two junior-level residents, two senior-level residents, two hand fellows, and one attending hand surgeon. Each injection was performed based on clinical examination and landmarks alone. The number of attempts and total time taken for each injection was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall success rate was 71%, (89 of 126 attempts) and did not vary significantly across levels of training. Average time for needle placement among all participants was 10.9 ± 6.5 seconds. Timing of successful intra-articular needle placement (10.4 ± 5.2 seconds) significantly differed between levels. However, timing did not trend in any direction with more or less training. No significant difference was noted in total attempts or attempts with successful outcomes when comparing level of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ulnocarpal approach is a viable option for injection or aspiration of the wrist without image guidance. We were unable to show any relevant trends with timing or number of attempts in comparison to level of training. <b>Level of Evidence: V</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":" ","pages":"207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210423/pdf/IOJ-42-01-207.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Accuracy of Wrist Intra-articular Needle Placement Via Ulnocarpal Approach by Training Level: A Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sierra Phillips, Megan Lameka, Christopher Beaumont, Nileshkumar Chaudhari, Jared Halstrom, James Rush Jones, Nicholas A Andrews, Ashish Shah\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-articular injections are a standard therapy and diagnostic tool for a variety of wrist conditions. Accurate needle placement is crucial for proper therapeutic benefit and prevention of complications. While some studies claim accurate needle placement requires imaging, others conclude that anatomical guidance is sufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of intra-articular wrist needle placement with the ulnocarpal approach across differing levels of training using clinical anatomy alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen fresh-frozen, above-elbow cadaveric specimens were used. Intra-articular needle placement into the wrist via an ulnocarpal approach was attempted by nine study participants: two interns, two junior-level residents, two senior-level residents, two hand fellows, and one attending hand surgeon. Each injection was performed based on clinical examination and landmarks alone. The number of attempts and total time taken for each injection was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall success rate was 71%, (89 of 126 attempts) and did not vary significantly across levels of training. Average time for needle placement among all participants was 10.9 ± 6.5 seconds. Timing of successful intra-articular needle placement (10.4 ± 5.2 seconds) significantly differed between levels. However, timing did not trend in any direction with more or less training. No significant difference was noted in total attempts or attempts with successful outcomes when comparing level of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ulnocarpal approach is a viable option for injection or aspiration of the wrist without image guidance. We were unable to show any relevant trends with timing or number of attempts in comparison to level of training. <b>Level of Evidence: V</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210423/pdf/IOJ-42-01-207.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关节内注射是治疗各种腕部疾病的标准疗法和诊断工具。准确的进针位置对于获得适当的治疗效果和预防并发症至关重要。一些研究称准确的针头置放需要成像,而另一些研究则认为解剖学指导就足够了。本研究旨在评估不同训练水平的医生仅凭临床解剖学知识在尺骨入路腕关节内置入针的准确性:方法:使用 14 个新鲜冷冻的肘部以上尸体标本。九名研究参与者尝试通过尺骨入路将关节内针置入腕部,其中包括两名实习生、两名初级住院医师、两名高级住院医师、两名手外科研究员和一名手外科主治医师。每次注射仅根据临床检查和地标进行。记录了每次注射的尝试次数和总耗时:结果:总体成功率为 71%(126 次尝试中的 89 次),不同培训级别的成功率差异不大。所有参与者的平均置针时间为 10.9 ± 6.5 秒。关节内置入针的成功时间(10.4 ± 5.2 秒)在不同级别之间存在显著差异。然而,训练时间的长短并没有任何变化趋势。比较训练水平时,总尝试次数和成功尝试次数无明显差异:结论:尺骨入路是在没有图像引导的情况下对腕部进行注射或抽吸的可行方法。结论:尺桡骨入路是在无图像引导的情况下进行腕部注射或抽吸的可行方案,但我们无法显示出与培训水平相关的时间或尝试次数趋势。证据等级:V.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Accuracy of Wrist Intra-articular Needle Placement Via Ulnocarpal Approach by Training Level: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: Intra-articular injections are a standard therapy and diagnostic tool for a variety of wrist conditions. Accurate needle placement is crucial for proper therapeutic benefit and prevention of complications. While some studies claim accurate needle placement requires imaging, others conclude that anatomical guidance is sufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of intra-articular wrist needle placement with the ulnocarpal approach across differing levels of training using clinical anatomy alone.

Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen, above-elbow cadaveric specimens were used. Intra-articular needle placement into the wrist via an ulnocarpal approach was attempted by nine study participants: two interns, two junior-level residents, two senior-level residents, two hand fellows, and one attending hand surgeon. Each injection was performed based on clinical examination and landmarks alone. The number of attempts and total time taken for each injection was recorded.

Results: Overall success rate was 71%, (89 of 126 attempts) and did not vary significantly across levels of training. Average time for needle placement among all participants was 10.9 ± 6.5 seconds. Timing of successful intra-articular needle placement (10.4 ± 5.2 seconds) significantly differed between levels. However, timing did not trend in any direction with more or less training. No significant difference was noted in total attempts or attempts with successful outcomes when comparing level of training.

Conclusion: The ulnocarpal approach is a viable option for injection or aspiration of the wrist without image guidance. We were unable to show any relevant trends with timing or number of attempts in comparison to level of training. Level of Evidence: V.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Any original article relevant to orthopaedic surgery, orthopaedic science or the teaching of either will be considered for publication in The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. Articles will be enthusiastically received from alumni, visitors to the department, members of the Iowa Orthopaedic Society, residents, and friends of The University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation. The journal is published every June.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信