生物膜和正畸材料:文献综述和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像库

Q4 Medicine
Laurence Lupi, Héloïse Paggetti, Marie-France Bertrand, Carole Charavet
{"title":"生物膜和正畸材料:文献综述和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像库","authors":"Laurence Lupi,&nbsp;Héloïse Paggetti,&nbsp;Marie-France Bertrand,&nbsp;Carole Charavet","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Plaque control remains a concern in oral health but also in orthodontics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to investigate the dental plaque adhesion to different orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four literature reviews were initiated to clarify the accumulation of dental plaque to different orthodontic appliances, namely the type of brackets (conventional versus self-ligating, metal versus clear), the type of ligatures (metal versus elastomeric) in addition to the type of archwires. Moreover, a gallery of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images was made on different orthodontic appliances before and/or after time in the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering the strong methodological heterogeneity of the included studies, there is no consensus on which type of bracket should be preferred for the prevention of plaque retention. Metal ligatures would be less prone to plaque accumulation compared to elastomeric ligatures, which are themselves color-dependent. The type of archwire was not investigated in this topic. SEM images highlighted the presence of anfractuosities on the surface of new orthodontic archwires as well as the presence of biofilm at different degrees of maturation on the appliances after time in the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although it is not possible to establish a consensus on which orthodontic appliances should be preferred to decrease plaque retention, different stages of biofilm evolution are observable on their surface and therefore potentially associated with a proportional virulence.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"93 2","pages":"111-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biofilm and Orthodontic Materials: literature reviews and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images gallery\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Lupi,&nbsp;Héloïse Paggetti,&nbsp;Marie-France Bertrand,&nbsp;Carole Charavet\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Plaque control remains a concern in oral health but also in orthodontics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to investigate the dental plaque adhesion to different orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four literature reviews were initiated to clarify the accumulation of dental plaque to different orthodontic appliances, namely the type of brackets (conventional versus self-ligating, metal versus clear), the type of ligatures (metal versus elastomeric) in addition to the type of archwires. Moreover, a gallery of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images was made on different orthodontic appliances before and/or after time in the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering the strong methodological heterogeneity of the included studies, there is no consensus on which type of bracket should be preferred for the prevention of plaque retention. Metal ligatures would be less prone to plaque accumulation compared to elastomeric ligatures, which are themselves color-dependent. The type of archwire was not investigated in this topic. SEM images highlighted the presence of anfractuosities on the surface of new orthodontic archwires as well as the presence of biofilm at different degrees of maturation on the appliances after time in the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although it is not possible to establish a consensus on which orthodontic appliances should be preferred to decrease plaque retention, different stages of biofilm evolution are observable on their surface and therefore potentially associated with a proportional virulence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"93 2\",\"pages\":\"111-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

菌斑的控制一直是口腔健康和正畸学关注的问题。目的:研究不同正畸矫治器对牙菌斑的粘附情况。材料和方法:四篇文献综述旨在阐明牙菌斑在不同正畸矫治器上的积累,即托槽的类型(传统的与自结扎的,金属的与透明的),结扎的类型(金属的与弹性的)以及弓丝的类型。此外,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)的画廊,对不同的正畸器具之前和/或之后的口腔。结果:考虑到纳入的研究的方法异质性,对于哪种类型的支架应该优先用于预防斑块保留,没有达成共识。与弹性体结扎物相比,金属结扎物不太容易形成斑块,弹性体结扎物本身就依赖于颜色。本课题未对拱丝的类型进行研究。扫描电镜图像显示,在口腔内放置一段时间后,新的正畸弓丝表面出现了不均匀的断裂,并且矫治器上存在不同成熟程度的生物膜。结论:虽然不可能就首选哪种正畸矫治器来减少牙菌斑保留达成共识,但在其表面可以观察到不同阶段的生物膜进化,因此可能与一定比例的毒性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biofilm and Orthodontic Materials: literature reviews and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images gallery

Introduction: Plaque control remains a concern in oral health but also in orthodontics.

Objective: The aim of this paper was to investigate the dental plaque adhesion to different orthodontic appliances.

Materials and methods: Four literature reviews were initiated to clarify the accumulation of dental plaque to different orthodontic appliances, namely the type of brackets (conventional versus self-ligating, metal versus clear), the type of ligatures (metal versus elastomeric) in addition to the type of archwires. Moreover, a gallery of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images was made on different orthodontic appliances before and/or after time in the oral cavity.

Results: Considering the strong methodological heterogeneity of the included studies, there is no consensus on which type of bracket should be preferred for the prevention of plaque retention. Metal ligatures would be less prone to plaque accumulation compared to elastomeric ligatures, which are themselves color-dependent. The type of archwire was not investigated in this topic. SEM images highlighted the presence of anfractuosities on the surface of new orthodontic archwires as well as the presence of biofilm at different degrees of maturation on the appliances after time in the oral cavity.

Conclusion: Although it is not possible to establish a consensus on which orthodontic appliances should be preferred to decrease plaque retention, different stages of biofilm evolution are observable on their surface and therefore potentially associated with a proportional virulence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信