识别老年人在老年创伤的风险评分:探索临床结果的相关性。

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_19_22
Stephen D Dingley, Wayne B Bauerle, Christine Ramirez, Holly Weber, Rebecca Wilde-Onia, Ann-Marie Szoke, Adam Benton, Danielle Frutiger, Alaa-Eldin Mira, William Hoff, Stanislaw P Stawicki
{"title":"识别老年人在老年创伤的风险评分:探索临床结果的相关性。","authors":"Stephen D Dingley,&nbsp;Wayne B Bauerle,&nbsp;Christine Ramirez,&nbsp;Holly Weber,&nbsp;Rebecca Wilde-Onia,&nbsp;Ann-Marie Szoke,&nbsp;Adam Benton,&nbsp;Danielle Frutiger,&nbsp;Alaa-Eldin Mira,&nbsp;William Hoff,&nbsp;Stanislaw P Stawicki","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_19_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Geriatric trauma patients (GTP) make up an increasing percentage of the overall trauma population. Due to frailty, GTP are at an increased risk of morbidity and readmission. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to prognosticate outcomes to assist with resource utilization. We hypothesized that the \"Identification of Seniors at Risk\" (ISAR) score may correlate with both clinical outcomes and resource utilization for geriatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients older than 65 years who were admitted to the trauma service were screened using an ISAR scoring algorithm. Outcomes, including 30-day mortality, all-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, functional independence measures (FIM) at discharge, and percent discharged to a facility, were analyzed. Both descriptive and data-appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches were utilized, with significance set at α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and two hundred seventeen GTP were included in this study. The average age was 81, median injury severity score was 9, and 99% had a blunt trauma mechanism. ISAR scores were generally associated with increasing 30-day mortality (0%, 1.9%, 2.4%, and 2.1% for ISAR 0, ISAR 1-2, ISAR 3-4, and ISAR 5-6, respectively), morbidity (2.6%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 7.3% for respective categories), longer hospital (3.1, 4.6, 5.1, and 4.3 days, respectively) and ICU stays (0.37, 0.64, 0.81, and 0.67, respectively), lower FIM score at discharge (18.5, 17.1, 15.8, and 14.4, for respective categories), as well as increasing percentage of patients discharged to a facility (29.8%, 58.9%, 72.1%, and 78.8% for respective categories).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study provides important early insight into potential relationships between ISAR and geriatric trauma outcomes. ISAR screening is a quick and easy-to-use tool that may be useful in GTP triage, level-of-care determination, and disposition planning. Understanding populations at risk, especially those with more intricate discharge needs, is an important step in mitigating those risks and implementing appropriate care plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"15 2","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336643/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Seniors at Risk Scoring in Geriatric Trauma: Exploring Clinical Outcome Correlations.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen D Dingley,&nbsp;Wayne B Bauerle,&nbsp;Christine Ramirez,&nbsp;Holly Weber,&nbsp;Rebecca Wilde-Onia,&nbsp;Ann-Marie Szoke,&nbsp;Adam Benton,&nbsp;Danielle Frutiger,&nbsp;Alaa-Eldin Mira,&nbsp;William Hoff,&nbsp;Stanislaw P Stawicki\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jets.jets_19_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Geriatric trauma patients (GTP) make up an increasing percentage of the overall trauma population. Due to frailty, GTP are at an increased risk of morbidity and readmission. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to prognosticate outcomes to assist with resource utilization. We hypothesized that the \\\"Identification of Seniors at Risk\\\" (ISAR) score may correlate with both clinical outcomes and resource utilization for geriatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients older than 65 years who were admitted to the trauma service were screened using an ISAR scoring algorithm. Outcomes, including 30-day mortality, all-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, functional independence measures (FIM) at discharge, and percent discharged to a facility, were analyzed. Both descriptive and data-appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches were utilized, with significance set at α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and two hundred seventeen GTP were included in this study. The average age was 81, median injury severity score was 9, and 99% had a blunt trauma mechanism. ISAR scores were generally associated with increasing 30-day mortality (0%, 1.9%, 2.4%, and 2.1% for ISAR 0, ISAR 1-2, ISAR 3-4, and ISAR 5-6, respectively), morbidity (2.6%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 7.3% for respective categories), longer hospital (3.1, 4.6, 5.1, and 4.3 days, respectively) and ICU stays (0.37, 0.64, 0.81, and 0.67, respectively), lower FIM score at discharge (18.5, 17.1, 15.8, and 14.4, for respective categories), as well as increasing percentage of patients discharged to a facility (29.8%, 58.9%, 72.1%, and 78.8% for respective categories).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study provides important early insight into potential relationships between ISAR and geriatric trauma outcomes. ISAR screening is a quick and easy-to-use tool that may be useful in GTP triage, level-of-care determination, and disposition planning. Understanding populations at risk, especially those with more intricate discharge needs, is an important step in mitigating those risks and implementing appropriate care plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"93-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_19_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_19_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:老年创伤患者(GTP)构成了整体创伤人口的百分比不断增加。由于体弱多病,GTP患者的发病率和再入院风险增加。因此,预测结果以协助资源利用变得越来越重要。我们假设“危险老年人识别”(ISAR)评分可能与老年创伤患者的临床结果和资源利用相关。方法:使用ISAR评分算法筛选65岁以上入院创伤服务的患者。结果包括30天死亡率、全因发病率、住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房(ICU) LOS、出院时功能独立测量(FIM)和出院到医院的百分比进行了分析。采用描述性和适合数据的参数和非参数统计方法,显著性设置为α = 0.05。结果:本研究共纳入11717个GTP。平均年龄81岁,中位损伤严重程度评分为9分,99%为钝性创伤机制。ISAR评分通常与30天死亡率(ISAR 0、ISAR 1-2、ISAR 3-4和ISAR 5-6分别为0%、1.9%、2.4%和2.1%)、发病率(各分类分别为2.6%、7.6%、14.7%和7.3%)、住院时间(分别为3.1、4.6、5.1和4.3天)和ICU住院时间(分别为0.37、0.64、0.81和0.67)、出院时FIM评分较低(各分类分别为18.5、17.1、15.8和14.4)相关。此外,出院的患者比例也在增加(分别为29.8%、58.9%、72.1%和78.8%)。结论:这项探索性研究为ISAR与老年创伤预后之间的潜在关系提供了重要的早期见解。ISAR筛查是一种快速且易于使用的工具,可用于GTP分诊、护理水平确定和处置计划。了解高危人群,特别是那些出院需求更为复杂的人群,是减轻这些风险和实施适当护理计划的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Seniors at Risk Scoring in Geriatric Trauma: Exploring Clinical Outcome Correlations.

Introduction: Geriatric trauma patients (GTP) make up an increasing percentage of the overall trauma population. Due to frailty, GTP are at an increased risk of morbidity and readmission. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to prognosticate outcomes to assist with resource utilization. We hypothesized that the "Identification of Seniors at Risk" (ISAR) score may correlate with both clinical outcomes and resource utilization for geriatric trauma patients.

Methods: Patients older than 65 years who were admitted to the trauma service were screened using an ISAR scoring algorithm. Outcomes, including 30-day mortality, all-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, functional independence measures (FIM) at discharge, and percent discharged to a facility, were analyzed. Both descriptive and data-appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches were utilized, with significance set at α = 0.05.

Results: One thousand and two hundred seventeen GTP were included in this study. The average age was 81, median injury severity score was 9, and 99% had a blunt trauma mechanism. ISAR scores were generally associated with increasing 30-day mortality (0%, 1.9%, 2.4%, and 2.1% for ISAR 0, ISAR 1-2, ISAR 3-4, and ISAR 5-6, respectively), morbidity (2.6%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 7.3% for respective categories), longer hospital (3.1, 4.6, 5.1, and 4.3 days, respectively) and ICU stays (0.37, 0.64, 0.81, and 0.67, respectively), lower FIM score at discharge (18.5, 17.1, 15.8, and 14.4, for respective categories), as well as increasing percentage of patients discharged to a facility (29.8%, 58.9%, 72.1%, and 78.8% for respective categories).

Conclusions: This exploratory study provides important early insight into potential relationships between ISAR and geriatric trauma outcomes. ISAR screening is a quick and easy-to-use tool that may be useful in GTP triage, level-of-care determination, and disposition planning. Understanding populations at risk, especially those with more intricate discharge needs, is an important step in mitigating those risks and implementing appropriate care plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信