靶向纳米粒子的多重物理药代动力学模型。

Frontiers in Medical Technology Pub Date : 2022-07-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2022.934015
Emma M Glass, Sahil Kulkarni, Christina Eng, Shurui Feng, Avishi Malaviya, Ravi Radhakrishnan
{"title":"靶向纳米粒子的多重物理药代动力学模型。","authors":"Emma M Glass, Sahil Kulkarni, Christina Eng, Shurui Feng, Avishi Malaviya, Ravi Radhakrishnan","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2022.934015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nanoparticles (NP) are being increasingly explored as vehicles for targeted drug delivery because they can overcome free therapeutic limitations by drug encapsulation, thereby increasing solubility and transport across cell membranes. However, a translational gap exists from animal to human studies resulting in only several NP having FDA approval. Because of this, researchers have begun to turn toward physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to guide <i>in vivo</i> NP experimentation. However, typical PBPK models use an empirically derived framework that cannot be universally applied to varying NP constructs and experimental settings. The purpose of this study was to develop a physics-based multiscale PBPK compartmental model for determining continuous NP biodistribution. We successfully developed two versions of a physics-based compartmental model, models A and B, and validated the models with experimental data. The more physiologically relevant model (model B) had an output that more closely resembled experimental data as determined by normalized root mean squared deviation (NRMSD) analysis. A branched model was developed to enable the model to account for varying NP sizes. With the help of the branched model, we were able to show that branching in vasculature causes enhanced uptake of NP in the organ tissue. The models were solved using two of the most popular computational platforms, MATLAB and Julia. Our experimentation with the two suggests the highly optimized ODE solver package DifferentialEquations.jl in Julia outperforms MATLAB when solving a stiff system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We experimented with solving our PBPK model with a neural network using Julia's Flux.jl package. We were able to demonstrate that a neural network can learn to solve a system of ODEs when the system can be made non-stiff <i>via</i> quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA). Our model incorporates modules that account for varying NP surface chemistries, multiscale vascular hydrodynamic effects, and effects of the immune system to create a more comprehensive and modular model for predicting NP biodistribution in a variety of NP constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":" ","pages":"934015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphysics pharmacokinetic model for targeted nanoparticles.\",\"authors\":\"Emma M Glass, Sahil Kulkarni, Christina Eng, Shurui Feng, Avishi Malaviya, Ravi Radhakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmedt.2022.934015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nanoparticles (NP) are being increasingly explored as vehicles for targeted drug delivery because they can overcome free therapeutic limitations by drug encapsulation, thereby increasing solubility and transport across cell membranes. However, a translational gap exists from animal to human studies resulting in only several NP having FDA approval. Because of this, researchers have begun to turn toward physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to guide <i>in vivo</i> NP experimentation. However, typical PBPK models use an empirically derived framework that cannot be universally applied to varying NP constructs and experimental settings. The purpose of this study was to develop a physics-based multiscale PBPK compartmental model for determining continuous NP biodistribution. We successfully developed two versions of a physics-based compartmental model, models A and B, and validated the models with experimental data. The more physiologically relevant model (model B) had an output that more closely resembled experimental data as determined by normalized root mean squared deviation (NRMSD) analysis. A branched model was developed to enable the model to account for varying NP sizes. With the help of the branched model, we were able to show that branching in vasculature causes enhanced uptake of NP in the organ tissue. The models were solved using two of the most popular computational platforms, MATLAB and Julia. Our experimentation with the two suggests the highly optimized ODE solver package DifferentialEquations.jl in Julia outperforms MATLAB when solving a stiff system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We experimented with solving our PBPK model with a neural network using Julia's Flux.jl package. We were able to demonstrate that a neural network can learn to solve a system of ODEs when the system can be made non-stiff <i>via</i> quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA). Our model incorporates modules that account for varying NP surface chemistries, multiscale vascular hydrodynamic effects, and effects of the immune system to create a more comprehensive and modular model for predicting NP biodistribution in a variety of NP constructs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medical Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"934015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.934015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.934015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳米粒子(NP)可通过药物封装克服自由治疗的限制,从而提高溶解度和跨细胞膜转运,因此越来越多的人将其作为靶向给药的载体。然而,从动物研究到人体研究之间存在着转化差距,导致只有几种 NP 获得了美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)的批准。因此,研究人员开始转向基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)模型来指导体内 NP 实验。然而,典型的 PBPK 模型使用的是经验得出的框架,无法普遍应用于不同的 NP 结构和实验环境。本研究的目的是开发一种基于物理学的多尺度 PBPK 区室模型,用于确定连续 NP 的生物分布。我们成功开发了两个版本的基于物理学的区室模型(模型 A 和模型 B),并用实验数据对模型进行了验证。根据归一化均方根偏差(NRMSD)分析,生理相关性更强的模型(模型 B)的输出结果更接近实验数据。为了使模型能够考虑不同的 NP 大小,还开发了一个分支模型。在分枝模型的帮助下,我们能够证明血管中的分枝会导致器官组织对 NP 的吸收增强。我们使用两种最流行的计算平台--MATLAB 和 Julia 对模型进行了求解。我们对这两个平台的实验表明,在求解僵硬的常微分方程(ODE)系统时,Julia 中高度优化的 ODE 求解器软件包 DifferentialEquations.jl 的性能优于 MATLAB。我们使用 Julia 的 Flux.jl 软件包尝试用神经网络求解 PBPK 模型。我们能够证明,当系统可以通过准稳态近似(QSSA)变得非刚性时,神经网络可以学会求解 ODE 系统。我们的模型结合了考虑不同 NP 表面化学性质、多尺度血管流体力学效应和免疫系统效应的模块,从而创建了一个更全面的模块化模型,用于预测各种 NP 构建物中的 NP 生物分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multiphysics pharmacokinetic model for targeted nanoparticles.

Multiphysics pharmacokinetic model for targeted nanoparticles.

Multiphysics pharmacokinetic model for targeted nanoparticles.

Multiphysics pharmacokinetic model for targeted nanoparticles.

Nanoparticles (NP) are being increasingly explored as vehicles for targeted drug delivery because they can overcome free therapeutic limitations by drug encapsulation, thereby increasing solubility and transport across cell membranes. However, a translational gap exists from animal to human studies resulting in only several NP having FDA approval. Because of this, researchers have begun to turn toward physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to guide in vivo NP experimentation. However, typical PBPK models use an empirically derived framework that cannot be universally applied to varying NP constructs and experimental settings. The purpose of this study was to develop a physics-based multiscale PBPK compartmental model for determining continuous NP biodistribution. We successfully developed two versions of a physics-based compartmental model, models A and B, and validated the models with experimental data. The more physiologically relevant model (model B) had an output that more closely resembled experimental data as determined by normalized root mean squared deviation (NRMSD) analysis. A branched model was developed to enable the model to account for varying NP sizes. With the help of the branched model, we were able to show that branching in vasculature causes enhanced uptake of NP in the organ tissue. The models were solved using two of the most popular computational platforms, MATLAB and Julia. Our experimentation with the two suggests the highly optimized ODE solver package DifferentialEquations.jl in Julia outperforms MATLAB when solving a stiff system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We experimented with solving our PBPK model with a neural network using Julia's Flux.jl package. We were able to demonstrate that a neural network can learn to solve a system of ODEs when the system can be made non-stiff via quasi-steady-state approximation (QSSA). Our model incorporates modules that account for varying NP surface chemistries, multiscale vascular hydrodynamic effects, and effects of the immune system to create a more comprehensive and modular model for predicting NP biodistribution in a variety of NP constructs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信