视网膜中央动脉闭塞症的当前诊断和治疗方法:德国卒中治疗单位的调查结果。

Carolin Hoyer, Simon Winzer, Egbert Matthé, Ida Heinle, Vesile Sandikci, Darius Nabavi, Michael Platten, Volker Puetz, Kristina Szabo
{"title":"视网膜中央动脉闭塞症的当前诊断和治疗方法:德国卒中治疗单位的调查结果。","authors":"Carolin Hoyer, Simon Winzer, Egbert Matthé, Ida Heinle, Vesile Sandikci, Darius Nabavi, Michael Platten, Volker Puetz, Kristina Szabo","doi":"10.1186/s42466-022-00193-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neuro-ophthalmological emergency whose optimal management is still under debate and due to the absence of definite guidelines, practice is expected to vary. We aimed to characterize early evaluation as well as acute treatment and diagnostic approaches in German hospitals with a stroke unit (SU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 07/2021, all 335 certified German SUs were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey endorsed by the German Stroke Society on emergency department care organization, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of patients with unilateral vision loss (UVL) subsequently diagnosed with CRAO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-three (48.6%) of the 335 eligible centers responded. Most (117/135; 86.7%) stated that UVL patients were treated as an emergency, in 62/138 (44.9%) hospitals according to specific guidelines. First-line evaluation was performed by neurologists in 85/136 (62.5%) hospitals, by ophthalmologists in 43/136 (31.6%) hospitals. Seventy of 135 (51.9%) respondents indicated a lack of on-site ophthalmological expertise. Seventy-four of 129 (57.4%) respondents performed thrombolysis in CRAO and 92/97 (94.8%) stated that patients with CRAO-if admitted to neurology-were treated on a SU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reflect notable heterogeneity in early intrahospital care of CRAO in German SUs but demonstrate a preference for work-up and management as acute stroke by the involved neurologists. Streamlining interdisciplinary emergency evaluation is essential for ongoing and future prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19169,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current diagnosis and treatment practice of central retinal artery occlusion: results from a survey among German stroke units.\",\"authors\":\"Carolin Hoyer, Simon Winzer, Egbert Matthé, Ida Heinle, Vesile Sandikci, Darius Nabavi, Michael Platten, Volker Puetz, Kristina Szabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-022-00193-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neuro-ophthalmological emergency whose optimal management is still under debate and due to the absence of definite guidelines, practice is expected to vary. We aimed to characterize early evaluation as well as acute treatment and diagnostic approaches in German hospitals with a stroke unit (SU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 07/2021, all 335 certified German SUs were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey endorsed by the German Stroke Society on emergency department care organization, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of patients with unilateral vision loss (UVL) subsequently diagnosed with CRAO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-three (48.6%) of the 335 eligible centers responded. Most (117/135; 86.7%) stated that UVL patients were treated as an emergency, in 62/138 (44.9%) hospitals according to specific guidelines. First-line evaluation was performed by neurologists in 85/136 (62.5%) hospitals, by ophthalmologists in 43/136 (31.6%) hospitals. Seventy of 135 (51.9%) respondents indicated a lack of on-site ophthalmological expertise. Seventy-four of 129 (57.4%) respondents performed thrombolysis in CRAO and 92/97 (94.8%) stated that patients with CRAO-if admitted to neurology-were treated on a SU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reflect notable heterogeneity in early intrahospital care of CRAO in German SUs but demonstrate a preference for work-up and management as acute stroke by the involved neurologists. Streamlining interdisciplinary emergency evaluation is essential for ongoing and future prospective trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00193-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00193-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:视网膜中央动脉闭塞症(CRAO)是一种神经眼科急症,其最佳治疗方法仍在争论之中,由于缺乏明确的指南,预计实践会有所不同。我们的目的是了解德国设有卒中单元(SU)的医院的早期评估、急性治疗和诊断方法的特点:方法:2021 年 7 月,我们邀请德国所有 335 家经认证的卒中单元参与由德国卒中协会发起的匿名在线调查,内容涉及急诊科护理组织、诊断程序以及对单侧视力丧失(UVL)患者随后被诊断为 CRAO 的治疗:在 335 家符合条件的中心中,有 163 家(48.6%)做出了回应。大多数医院(117/135;86.7%)称,62/138(44.9%)家医院根据特定指南将单侧视力丧失患者作为急诊治疗。85/136(62.5%)家医院由神经科医生进行一线评估,43/136(31.6%)家医院由眼科医生进行一线评估。135家受访医院中有70家(51.9%)表示缺乏现场眼科专家。129名受访者中有74名(57.4%)对CRAO患者进行了溶栓治疗,92/97(94.8%)的受访者表示,如果神经内科收治CRAO患者,他们会在SU接受治疗:我们的研究结果表明,在德国的医疗机构中,CRAO 的院内早期治疗存在明显的异质性,但这也表明,参与治疗的神经科医生更倾向于将 CRAO 作为急性卒中进行检查和治疗。简化跨学科急诊评估对于正在进行的和未来的前瞻性试验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current diagnosis and treatment practice of central retinal artery occlusion: results from a survey among German stroke units.

Current diagnosis and treatment practice of central retinal artery occlusion: results from a survey among German stroke units.

Current diagnosis and treatment practice of central retinal artery occlusion: results from a survey among German stroke units.

Background: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neuro-ophthalmological emergency whose optimal management is still under debate and due to the absence of definite guidelines, practice is expected to vary. We aimed to characterize early evaluation as well as acute treatment and diagnostic approaches in German hospitals with a stroke unit (SU).

Methods: In 07/2021, all 335 certified German SUs were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey endorsed by the German Stroke Society on emergency department care organization, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of patients with unilateral vision loss (UVL) subsequently diagnosed with CRAO.

Results: One hundred and sixty-three (48.6%) of the 335 eligible centers responded. Most (117/135; 86.7%) stated that UVL patients were treated as an emergency, in 62/138 (44.9%) hospitals according to specific guidelines. First-line evaluation was performed by neurologists in 85/136 (62.5%) hospitals, by ophthalmologists in 43/136 (31.6%) hospitals. Seventy of 135 (51.9%) respondents indicated a lack of on-site ophthalmological expertise. Seventy-four of 129 (57.4%) respondents performed thrombolysis in CRAO and 92/97 (94.8%) stated that patients with CRAO-if admitted to neurology-were treated on a SU.

Conclusions: Our findings reflect notable heterogeneity in early intrahospital care of CRAO in German SUs but demonstrate a preference for work-up and management as acute stroke by the involved neurologists. Streamlining interdisciplinary emergency evaluation is essential for ongoing and future prospective trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信