弥散加权成像和动态增强磁共振成像在糖尿病足骨髓炎诊断中的作用:初步报告。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-05-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.116637
Shashank Raj, Mahesh Prakash, Ashu Rastogi, Anindita Sinha, Manavjit Singh Sandhu
{"title":"弥散加权成像和动态增强磁共振成像在糖尿病足骨髓炎诊断中的作用:初步报告。","authors":"Shashank Raj,&nbsp;Mahesh Prakash,&nbsp;Ashu Rastogi,&nbsp;Anindita Sinha,&nbsp;Manavjit Singh Sandhu","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.116637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, SI<sub>rel</sub>, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (<i>p</i>-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SI<sub>rel</sub>. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI<sub>0</sub> > 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SI<sub>max</sub> had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; <i>p</i>-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of > 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10<sup>-3</sup> had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot's arthropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/8b/PJR-87-47129.PMC9215298.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report.\",\"authors\":\"Shashank Raj,&nbsp;Mahesh Prakash,&nbsp;Ashu Rastogi,&nbsp;Anindita Sinha,&nbsp;Manavjit Singh Sandhu\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.116637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, SI<sub>rel</sub>, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI<sub>0</sub>, SI<sub>max</sub>, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (<i>p</i>-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SI<sub>rel</sub>. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI<sub>0</sub> > 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SI<sub>max</sub> had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; <i>p</i>-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of > 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10<sup>-3</sup> had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot's arthropathy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/8b/PJR-87-47129.PMC9215298.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.116637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.116637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:探讨动态磁共振增强成像(DCE-MRI)和弥散加权成像(DWI)对糖尿病足骨髓炎(DFO)的诊断价值。材料和方法:纳入了25名疑似骨髓炎的参与者,他们接受了MRI检查,包括DCE-MRI和DWI序列。随后进行骨活检和微生物分析(金标准)。根据活检结果将参与者分为两组:dfo阳性或dfo阴性。比较两组患者的半定量DCE-MRI参数(SI0、SImax、SIrel、冲洗率[WIR]、曲线类型)和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。结果:25例骨活检中,dfo阳性19例,dfo阴性6例。dfo阳性患者SI0、SImax、WIR均显著增高(p值分别为0.050、0.023、0.004)。在SIrel中没有发现差异。阴性病例100%为i型曲线,阳性病例94%为ii型曲线。SI0 > 143.4敏感性为94.7%,特异性为83.3%。SImax的敏感性为89.5%,但特异性较低,为67.7%,临界值为408.35。WIR差异最显著;假定值~ 0.004。在临界值> 1.280时,特异性为100%,敏感性为76%。ADC值低于1.57 × 10-3诊断DFO的敏感性为88.2%,特异性为80%。结论:DWI和DCE-MRI提供无创序列,有助于提高常规MRI诊断骨髓炎的整体特异性和敏感性,与急性Charcot关节病鉴别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report.

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report.

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a preliminary report.

Purpose: To assess the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).

Material and methods: Twenty-five participants with suspected osteomyelitis were included, who underwent MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI sequences. It was subsequently followed by bone biopsy and microbiological analysis (gold standard). The participants were divided into 2 groups based on biopsy results: DFO-positive or DFO-negative. The semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters (SI0, SImax, SIrel, wash-in rate [WIR], and type of curve) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were subsequently compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Out of the 25 cases, 19 were DFO-positive and 6 were DFO-negative on bone biopsy. The SI0, SImax, and WIR were significantly higher in DFO-positive cases (p-value 0.050, 0.023, and 0.004, respectively). No difference was seen in SIrel. 100% negative cases revealed type-I curve, and 94% of positive cases showed type-II curve. SI0 > 143.4 revealed a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 83.3%. SImax had a sensitivity of 89.5% but lower specificity of 67.7% at a cut-off value of 408.35. The most significant difference was seen with WIR; p-value ~0.004. At the cut-off value of > 1.280, it had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 76%, respectively. Also, ADC values below 1.57 × 10-3 had a sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing DFO.

Conclusions: DWI and DCE-MRI provide non-invasive sequences, which can help to increase the overall specificity and sensitivity of conventional MRI for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, differentiating it from acute Charcot's arthropathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信