子宫腺肌症与纳博氏囊肿有关系吗?

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-06-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.116913
Pinar Diydem Yilmaz, Cengiz Kadiyoran, Jule Horasanli
{"title":"子宫腺肌症与纳博氏囊肿有关系吗?","authors":"Pinar Diydem Yilmaz, Cengiz Kadiyoran, Jule Horasanli","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.116913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst (NC) in a large patient series.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The patient's data were scanned retrospectively and patients with a junctional zone thickness of 12 mm and above on magnetic resonance imaging were accepted as group adenomyosis (group A). Patients with a junctional zone thickness of less than 12 mm were not admitted as adenomyosis (control group). Both groups were compared for NC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, 176 (69.8%) patients had NC (<i>n</i> = 250), while in the control group (<i>n</i> = 202), 57 (28.2%) patients had NC. NC was significantly higher in group A than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aetiology of NC is still unclear. According to our results, similar factors may affect adenomyosis and NC aetiopathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/19/PJR-87-47207.PMC9215300.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst?\",\"authors\":\"Pinar Diydem Yilmaz, Cengiz Kadiyoran, Jule Horasanli\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.116913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst (NC) in a large patient series.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The patient's data were scanned retrospectively and patients with a junctional zone thickness of 12 mm and above on magnetic resonance imaging were accepted as group adenomyosis (group A). Patients with a junctional zone thickness of less than 12 mm were not admitted as adenomyosis (control group). Both groups were compared for NC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, 176 (69.8%) patients had NC (<i>n</i> = 250), while in the control group (<i>n</i> = 202), 57 (28.2%) patients had NC. NC was significantly higher in group A than in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aetiology of NC is still unclear. According to our results, similar factors may affect adenomyosis and NC aetiopathogenesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/19/PJR-87-47207.PMC9215300.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.116913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.116913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是在一个大型患者系列中调查子宫腺肌症与纳博氏囊肿(NC)之间是否存在关系:对患者资料进行回顾性扫描,将磁共振成像中交界区厚度在 12 毫米及以上的患者视为腺肌症(A 组)。交界区厚度小于 12 毫米的患者不被视为腺肌症(对照组)。对两组患者的 NC 进行比较:A组中有176名(69.8%)患者患有NC(n = 250),而对照组(n = 202)中有57名(28.2%)患者患有NC。A组的NC发病率明显高于对照组(P < 0.001):NC的病因尚不清楚。根据我们的研究结果,影响子宫腺肌症和 NC 病因发病机制的因素可能相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is there a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst?

Is there a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst?

Is there a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst?

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between adenomyosis and nabothian cyst (NC) in a large patient series.

Material and methods: The patient's data were scanned retrospectively and patients with a junctional zone thickness of 12 mm and above on magnetic resonance imaging were accepted as group adenomyosis (group A). Patients with a junctional zone thickness of less than 12 mm were not admitted as adenomyosis (control group). Both groups were compared for NC.

Results: In group A, 176 (69.8%) patients had NC (n = 250), while in the control group (n = 202), 57 (28.2%) patients had NC. NC was significantly higher in group A than in the control group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The aetiology of NC is still unclear. According to our results, similar factors may affect adenomyosis and NC aetiopathogenesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信