通过跨专业临床医生奖学金计划促进使用学习卫生系统

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sathana Dushyanthen, Meg Perrier, Wendy Chapman, Meredith Layton, Kayley Lyons
{"title":"通过跨专业临床医生奖学金计划促进使用学习卫生系统","authors":"Sathana Dushyanthen,&nbsp;Meg Perrier,&nbsp;Wendy Chapman,&nbsp;Meredith Layton,&nbsp;Kayley Lyons","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>To address Australian workforce needs, we developed a Learning Healthcare System (LHS) Academy fellowship program for clinicians. In the Academy, fellows complete foundational coursework, an LHS project, and other professional development deliverables to foster their future as digital health champions within their organizations. In this paper, we describe the 11-month-long program, as well as our evaluation results from the first 2 months of the program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In the first week of the program, we sent all fellows an open-ended survey asking fellows to describe their digital health professional identities and what they expected to achieve from the fellowship program. At 2 months, we sent a follow-up open-ended survey that captured identical measures, their perceived barriers to participation in the program, perceived use of topics in the workplace and to their projects, and recommendations for program improvement. We analyzed the open text responses using qualitative content analysis, to identify categories of responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 2 months into the program, it was evident that participants were finding the teaching model engaging, useful, valuable, and applicable to their work and projects. Fellows perceived barriers to engagement in the program as balancing other commitments, lacking technical expertise, and having difficulty seeing themselves as leaders. Fellows expected that the program will allow them to implement new models of care, provide them with enough expertise to become leaders and champions in digital health, and become mentors for future generations. As far as changes in their professional identity, there was a notable increase in the number of fellows perceiving themselves as leaders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Fellowship programs are one promising means of developing the healthcare workforce in LHS capabilities. Future studies should describe and evaluate LHS programs, to provide insights and recommendations for other educators interested in implementing similar programs of work within their own institutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/05/LRH2-6-e10340.PMC9576228.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering the use of Learning Health Systems through a fellowship program for interprofessional clinicians\",\"authors\":\"Sathana Dushyanthen,&nbsp;Meg Perrier,&nbsp;Wendy Chapman,&nbsp;Meredith Layton,&nbsp;Kayley Lyons\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.10340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>To address Australian workforce needs, we developed a Learning Healthcare System (LHS) Academy fellowship program for clinicians. In the Academy, fellows complete foundational coursework, an LHS project, and other professional development deliverables to foster their future as digital health champions within their organizations. In this paper, we describe the 11-month-long program, as well as our evaluation results from the first 2 months of the program.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the first week of the program, we sent all fellows an open-ended survey asking fellows to describe their digital health professional identities and what they expected to achieve from the fellowship program. At 2 months, we sent a follow-up open-ended survey that captured identical measures, their perceived barriers to participation in the program, perceived use of topics in the workplace and to their projects, and recommendations for program improvement. We analyzed the open text responses using qualitative content analysis, to identify categories of responses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 2 months into the program, it was evident that participants were finding the teaching model engaging, useful, valuable, and applicable to their work and projects. Fellows perceived barriers to engagement in the program as balancing other commitments, lacking technical expertise, and having difficulty seeing themselves as leaders. Fellows expected that the program will allow them to implement new models of care, provide them with enough expertise to become leaders and champions in digital health, and become mentors for future generations. As far as changes in their professional identity, there was a notable increase in the number of fellows perceiving themselves as leaders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fellowship programs are one promising means of developing the healthcare workforce in LHS capabilities. Future studies should describe and evaluate LHS programs, to provide insights and recommendations for other educators interested in implementing similar programs of work within their own institutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/05/LRH2-6-e10340.PMC9576228.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了满足澳大利亚劳动力的需求,我们为临床医生开发了一个学习医疗保健系统(LHS)学院奖学金项目。在学院,研究员完成基础课程、LHS项目和其他专业发展成果,以培养他们在组织内成为数字健康冠军的未来。在本文中,我们描述了为期11个月的项目,以及我们在项目前2个月的评估结果。在项目的第一周,我们向所有研究员发送了一份开放式调查问卷,要求研究员描述他们的数字健康专业身份以及他们期望从奖学金项目中实现的目标。2个月后,我们发送了一份后续的开放式调查,收集了相同的措施,他们参与项目的感知障碍,他们在工作场所和项目中对主题的感知使用,以及对项目改进的建议。我们使用定性内容分析来分析开放文本回复,以确定回复的类别。总的来说,在项目的两个月里,很明显,参与者发现教学模式引人入胜,有用,有价值,并且适用于他们的工作和项目。学员们认为参与项目的障碍包括平衡其他任务、缺乏技术专长以及难以将自己视为领导者。学员们希望,该项目将使他们能够实施新的护理模式,为他们提供足够的专业知识,成为数字健康领域的领导者和拥护者,并成为后代的导师。就职业身份的变化而言,认为自己是领导者的人数显著增加。结论:研究金项目是发展LHS能力的一种有前途的手段。未来的研究应该描述和评估LHS项目,为其他有兴趣在自己的机构中实施类似项目的教育工作者提供见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fostering the use of Learning Health Systems through a fellowship program for interprofessional clinicians

Fostering the use of Learning Health Systems through a fellowship program for interprofessional clinicians

Introduction

To address Australian workforce needs, we developed a Learning Healthcare System (LHS) Academy fellowship program for clinicians. In the Academy, fellows complete foundational coursework, an LHS project, and other professional development deliverables to foster their future as digital health champions within their organizations. In this paper, we describe the 11-month-long program, as well as our evaluation results from the first 2 months of the program.

Methods

In the first week of the program, we sent all fellows an open-ended survey asking fellows to describe their digital health professional identities and what they expected to achieve from the fellowship program. At 2 months, we sent a follow-up open-ended survey that captured identical measures, their perceived barriers to participation in the program, perceived use of topics in the workplace and to their projects, and recommendations for program improvement. We analyzed the open text responses using qualitative content analysis, to identify categories of responses.

Results

Overall, 2 months into the program, it was evident that participants were finding the teaching model engaging, useful, valuable, and applicable to their work and projects. Fellows perceived barriers to engagement in the program as balancing other commitments, lacking technical expertise, and having difficulty seeing themselves as leaders. Fellows expected that the program will allow them to implement new models of care, provide them with enough expertise to become leaders and champions in digital health, and become mentors for future generations. As far as changes in their professional identity, there was a notable increase in the number of fellows perceiving themselves as leaders.

Conclusion

Fellowship programs are one promising means of developing the healthcare workforce in LHS capabilities. Future studies should describe and evaluate LHS programs, to provide insights and recommendations for other educators interested in implementing similar programs of work within their own institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信