概念化市政选举:以2018年多伦多为例。

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES
Urban Affairs Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1177/10780874211031155
J Scott Matthews, R Michael McGregor, Laura B Stephenson
{"title":"概念化市政选举:以2018年多伦多为例。","authors":"J Scott Matthews,&nbsp;R Michael McGregor,&nbsp;Laura B Stephenson","doi":"10.1177/10780874211031155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since Angus Campbell and colleagues first introduced the \"levels of conceptualization\" (LoC) framework as a measure of political sophistication, a number of scholars have applied the approach to subsequent American national elections. In this study, we present the first application of the LoC framework to a municipal election, and focus upon the 2018 Toronto mayoral race. After describing the method and data we use to adapt the framework to this new context, we replicate previous analyses, and find that LoC is related to local voter turnout and several measures of political sophistication. We then consider the question of whether major candidates were discussed at different LoC, and if their supporters view local politics at different LoC. We conclude by making the case that the LoC framework is helpful for resolving the debate over whether local politics are ideological or managerial in nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":51427,"journal":{"name":"Urban Affairs Review","volume":"58 5","pages":"1438-1465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10780874211031155","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing Municipal Elections: The Case of Toronto 2018.\",\"authors\":\"J Scott Matthews,&nbsp;R Michael McGregor,&nbsp;Laura B Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10780874211031155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since Angus Campbell and colleagues first introduced the \\\"levels of conceptualization\\\" (LoC) framework as a measure of political sophistication, a number of scholars have applied the approach to subsequent American national elections. In this study, we present the first application of the LoC framework to a municipal election, and focus upon the 2018 Toronto mayoral race. After describing the method and data we use to adapt the framework to this new context, we replicate previous analyses, and find that LoC is related to local voter turnout and several measures of political sophistication. We then consider the question of whether major candidates were discussed at different LoC, and if their supporters view local politics at different LoC. We conclude by making the case that the LoC framework is helpful for resolving the debate over whether local politics are ideological or managerial in nature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Affairs Review\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"1438-1465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10780874211031155\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Affairs Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211031155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Affairs Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211031155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自从安格斯·坎贝尔(Angus Campbell)及其同事首次将“概念化水平”(LoC)框架作为政治成熟度的衡量标准以来,许多学者将该方法应用于随后的美国全国大选。在本研究中,我们首次将LoC框架应用于市政选举,并将重点放在2018年多伦多市长竞选上。在描述了我们用来使框架适应这种新背景的方法和数据之后,我们重复了之前的分析,发现LoC与当地选民投票率和政治复杂性的几个指标有关。然后,我们考虑主要候选人是否在不同的LoC上被讨论,以及他们的支持者是否在不同的LoC上看待当地政治。我们的结论是,LoC框架有助于解决关于地方政治本质上是意识形态还是管理的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Conceptualizing Municipal Elections: The Case of Toronto 2018.

Conceptualizing Municipal Elections: The Case of Toronto 2018.

Conceptualizing Municipal Elections: The Case of Toronto 2018.

Conceptualizing Municipal Elections: The Case of Toronto 2018.

Since Angus Campbell and colleagues first introduced the "levels of conceptualization" (LoC) framework as a measure of political sophistication, a number of scholars have applied the approach to subsequent American national elections. In this study, we present the first application of the LoC framework to a municipal election, and focus upon the 2018 Toronto mayoral race. After describing the method and data we use to adapt the framework to this new context, we replicate previous analyses, and find that LoC is related to local voter turnout and several measures of political sophistication. We then consider the question of whether major candidates were discussed at different LoC, and if their supporters view local politics at different LoC. We conclude by making the case that the LoC framework is helpful for resolving the debate over whether local politics are ideological or managerial in nature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Affairs Review
Urban Affairs Review URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Urban Affairs Reveiw (UAR) is a leading scholarly journal on urban issues and themes. For almost five decades scholars, researchers, policymakers, planners, and administrators have turned to UAR for the latest international research and empirical analysis on the programs and policies that shape our cities. UAR covers: urban policy; urban economic development; residential and community development; governance and service delivery; comparative/international urban research; and social, spatial, and cultural dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信