HIV-1传播集群的系统发育优先级与病毒谱系水平多样化率。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2022-07-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/emph/eoac026
Rachel L Miller, Angela McLaughlin, Richard H Liang, John Harding, Jason Wong, Anh Q Le, Chanson J Brumme, Julio S G Montaner, Jeffrey B Joy
{"title":"HIV-1传播集群的系统发育优先级与病毒谱系水平多样化率。","authors":"Rachel L Miller,&nbsp;Angela McLaughlin,&nbsp;Richard H Liang,&nbsp;John Harding,&nbsp;Jason Wong,&nbsp;Anh Q Le,&nbsp;Chanson J Brumme,&nbsp;Julio S G Montaner,&nbsp;Jeffrey B Joy","doi":"10.1093/emph/eoac026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Public health officials faced with a large number of transmission clusters require a rapid, scalable and unbiased way to prioritize distribution of limited resources to maximize benefits. We hypothesize that transmission cluster prioritization based on phylogenetically derived lineage-level diversification rates will perform as well as or better than commonly used growth-based prioritization measures, without need for historical data or subjective interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>9822 HIV pol sequences collected during routine drug resistance genotyping were used alongside simulated sequence data to infer sets of phylogenetic transmission clusters via patristic distance threshold. Prioritized clusters inferred from empirical data were compared to those prioritized by the current public health protocols. Prioritization of simulated clusters was evaluated based on correlation of a given prioritization measure with future cluster growth, as well as the number of direct downstream transmissions from cluster members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empirical data suggest diversification rate-based measures perform comparably to growth-based measures in recreating public heath prioritization choices. However, unbiased simulated data reveals phylogenetic diversification rate-based measures perform better in predicting future cluster growth relative to growth-based measures, particularly long-term growth. Diversification rate-based measures also display advantages over growth-based measures in highlighting groups with greater future transmission events compared to random groups of the same size. Furthermore, diversification rate measures were notably more robust to effects of decreased sampling proportion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our findings indicate diversification rate-based measures frequently outperform growth-based measures in predicting future cluster growth and offer several additional advantages beneficial to optimizing the public health prioritization process.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311310/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenetic prioritization of HIV-1 transmission clusters with viral lineage-level diversification rates.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L Miller,&nbsp;Angela McLaughlin,&nbsp;Richard H Liang,&nbsp;John Harding,&nbsp;Jason Wong,&nbsp;Anh Q Le,&nbsp;Chanson J Brumme,&nbsp;Julio S G Montaner,&nbsp;Jeffrey B Joy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/emph/eoac026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Public health officials faced with a large number of transmission clusters require a rapid, scalable and unbiased way to prioritize distribution of limited resources to maximize benefits. We hypothesize that transmission cluster prioritization based on phylogenetically derived lineage-level diversification rates will perform as well as or better than commonly used growth-based prioritization measures, without need for historical data or subjective interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>9822 HIV pol sequences collected during routine drug resistance genotyping were used alongside simulated sequence data to infer sets of phylogenetic transmission clusters via patristic distance threshold. Prioritized clusters inferred from empirical data were compared to those prioritized by the current public health protocols. Prioritization of simulated clusters was evaluated based on correlation of a given prioritization measure with future cluster growth, as well as the number of direct downstream transmissions from cluster members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Empirical data suggest diversification rate-based measures perform comparably to growth-based measures in recreating public heath prioritization choices. However, unbiased simulated data reveals phylogenetic diversification rate-based measures perform better in predicting future cluster growth relative to growth-based measures, particularly long-term growth. Diversification rate-based measures also display advantages over growth-based measures in highlighting groups with greater future transmission events compared to random groups of the same size. Furthermore, diversification rate measures were notably more robust to effects of decreased sampling proportion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our findings indicate diversification rate-based measures frequently outperform growth-based measures in predicting future cluster growth and offer several additional advantages beneficial to optimizing the public health prioritization process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9311310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoac026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoac026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景和目标:面临大量传播聚集的公共卫生官员需要一种快速、可扩展和公正的方式来优先分配有限的资源,以实现利益最大化。我们假设,在不需要历史数据或主观解释的情况下,基于系统发育衍生的谱系水平多样化率的传播集群优先级排序将与常用的基于生长的优先级度量一样好,甚至更好。方法:利用常规耐药基因分型收集的9822个HIV pol序列,结合模拟序列数据,通过教父距离阈值推断出一组系统发育传播簇。将从经验数据推断出的优先群集与现行公共卫生协议确定的优先群集进行比较。基于给定的优先级度量与未来集群增长的相关性,以及集群成员直接下游传输的数量,评估了模拟集群的优先级。结果:经验数据表明,在重建公共卫生优先选择方面,基于多样化率的措施与基于增长的措施表现相当。然而,无偏模拟数据显示,相对于基于生长的指标,基于系统发育多样化率的指标在预测未来集群生长方面表现更好,尤其是长期增长。与相同规模的随机群体相比,基于多样化率的衡量标准在突出具有更大未来传播事件的群体方面也显示出优于基于增长的衡量标准的优势。此外,多样化率指标对抽样比例降低的影响显著增强。结论和意义:我们的研究结果表明,在预测未来集群增长方面,基于多样化率的指标往往优于基于增长的指标,并提供了一些有利于优化公共卫生优先排序过程的额外优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Phylogenetic prioritization of HIV-1 transmission clusters with viral lineage-level diversification rates.

Phylogenetic prioritization of HIV-1 transmission clusters with viral lineage-level diversification rates.

Phylogenetic prioritization of HIV-1 transmission clusters with viral lineage-level diversification rates.

Phylogenetic prioritization of HIV-1 transmission clusters with viral lineage-level diversification rates.

Background and objectives: Public health officials faced with a large number of transmission clusters require a rapid, scalable and unbiased way to prioritize distribution of limited resources to maximize benefits. We hypothesize that transmission cluster prioritization based on phylogenetically derived lineage-level diversification rates will perform as well as or better than commonly used growth-based prioritization measures, without need for historical data or subjective interpretation.

Methodology: 9822 HIV pol sequences collected during routine drug resistance genotyping were used alongside simulated sequence data to infer sets of phylogenetic transmission clusters via patristic distance threshold. Prioritized clusters inferred from empirical data were compared to those prioritized by the current public health protocols. Prioritization of simulated clusters was evaluated based on correlation of a given prioritization measure with future cluster growth, as well as the number of direct downstream transmissions from cluster members.

Results: Empirical data suggest diversification rate-based measures perform comparably to growth-based measures in recreating public heath prioritization choices. However, unbiased simulated data reveals phylogenetic diversification rate-based measures perform better in predicting future cluster growth relative to growth-based measures, particularly long-term growth. Diversification rate-based measures also display advantages over growth-based measures in highlighting groups with greater future transmission events compared to random groups of the same size. Furthermore, diversification rate measures were notably more robust to effects of decreased sampling proportion.

Conclusions and implications: Our findings indicate diversification rate-based measures frequently outperform growth-based measures in predicting future cluster growth and offer several additional advantages beneficial to optimizing the public health prioritization process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信