缬沙坦与非ras抑制剂单药治疗对中国高血压患者新发糖尿病发病率的实际疗效比较:基于电子健康记录系统的研究

Tian Shen, Jiwei Wang, Yingjun Yu, Jinming Yu
{"title":"缬沙坦与非ras抑制剂单药治疗对中国高血压患者新发糖尿病发病率的实际疗效比较:基于电子健康记录系统的研究","authors":"Tian Shen,&nbsp;Jiwei Wang,&nbsp;Yingjun Yu,&nbsp;Jinming Yu","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2018.1469640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness of valsartan and non renin-angiotensin system (non-RAS) agent monotherapy on the incidence of new on-set diabetes (NOD) in Chinese hypertensive patients. It was based on an electronic Health Recording System database from Minhang District of Shanghai. Hypertensive patients aged ≥18 years continuously taking either valsartan or non-RAS agent monotherapy for >12 months were included. Hazard ratios (HR) of NOD events were estimated using propensity score matching method and multivariate regression. Of 29295 patients, there were 2107 in valsartan group, 21397 in CCB group, 4094 in β-blockers group and 1697 in diuretics group. Two-year follow-up revealed NOD rates of 11.09 and 14.22 per 100 persons per year in valsartan and non-RAS inhibitor groups (HR = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.93, P = 0.006), respectively. Among non-RAS agents, CCB group had the highest incidence of NOD (21.72 per 100 persons per year). Comparisons between CCB sub-groups revealed the highest NOD incidence for nifedipine, followed by amlodipine and felodipine. NOD incidences in β-blockers and diuretics groups (11.70 and 10.50 per 100 persons per year, respectively) were not significantly different from valsartan group. Compared with non-RAS inhibitors, particularly CCBs, valsartan could significantly reduce the incidence of NOD.</p>","PeriodicalId":286988,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)","volume":" ","pages":"244-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641963.2018.1469640","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of real-world effectiveness between valsartan and non-RAS inhibitor monotherapy on the incidence of new diabetes in Chinese hypertensive patients: An electronic health recording system based study.\",\"authors\":\"Tian Shen,&nbsp;Jiwei Wang,&nbsp;Yingjun Yu,&nbsp;Jinming Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641963.2018.1469640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness of valsartan and non renin-angiotensin system (non-RAS) agent monotherapy on the incidence of new on-set diabetes (NOD) in Chinese hypertensive patients. It was based on an electronic Health Recording System database from Minhang District of Shanghai. Hypertensive patients aged ≥18 years continuously taking either valsartan or non-RAS agent monotherapy for >12 months were included. Hazard ratios (HR) of NOD events were estimated using propensity score matching method and multivariate regression. Of 29295 patients, there were 2107 in valsartan group, 21397 in CCB group, 4094 in β-blockers group and 1697 in diuretics group. Two-year follow-up revealed NOD rates of 11.09 and 14.22 per 100 persons per year in valsartan and non-RAS inhibitor groups (HR = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.93, P = 0.006), respectively. Among non-RAS agents, CCB group had the highest incidence of NOD (21.72 per 100 persons per year). Comparisons between CCB sub-groups revealed the highest NOD incidence for nifedipine, followed by amlodipine and felodipine. NOD incidences in β-blockers and diuretics groups (11.70 and 10.50 per 100 persons per year, respectively) were not significantly different from valsartan group. Compared with non-RAS inhibitors, particularly CCBs, valsartan could significantly reduce the incidence of NOD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":286988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"244-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10641963.2018.1469640\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2018.1469640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2018.1469640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在比较缬沙坦与非肾素-血管紧张素系统(non- ras)药物单药治疗对中国高血压患者新发首发糖尿病(NOD)发病率的实际疗效。本研究基于上海市闵行区电子健康记录系统数据库。年龄≥18岁的高血压患者连续服用缬沙坦或非ras药物单药治疗>12个月。采用倾向评分匹配法和多元回归法估计NOD事件的风险比(HR)。29295例患者中,缬沙坦组2107例,CCB组21397例,β受体阻滞剂组4094例,利尿剂组1697例。2年随访显示,缬沙坦组和非ras抑制剂组每年的NOD发生率分别为11.09和14.22 / 100人(HR = 0.77, 95%可信区间为0.65-0.93,P = 0.006)。在非ras药物中,CCB组NOD发生率最高(21.72 / 100人/年)。CCB亚组间比较显示硝苯地平NOD发生率最高,其次是氨氯地平和非洛地平。β受体阻滞剂组和利尿剂组NOD发生率(分别为11.70 / 100人/年和10.50 / 100人/年)与缬沙坦组无显著差异。与非ras抑制剂,特别是CCBs相比,缬沙坦可以显著降低NOD的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of real-world effectiveness between valsartan and non-RAS inhibitor monotherapy on the incidence of new diabetes in Chinese hypertensive patients: An electronic health recording system based study.

This study aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness of valsartan and non renin-angiotensin system (non-RAS) agent monotherapy on the incidence of new on-set diabetes (NOD) in Chinese hypertensive patients. It was based on an electronic Health Recording System database from Minhang District of Shanghai. Hypertensive patients aged ≥18 years continuously taking either valsartan or non-RAS agent monotherapy for >12 months were included. Hazard ratios (HR) of NOD events were estimated using propensity score matching method and multivariate regression. Of 29295 patients, there were 2107 in valsartan group, 21397 in CCB group, 4094 in β-blockers group and 1697 in diuretics group. Two-year follow-up revealed NOD rates of 11.09 and 14.22 per 100 persons per year in valsartan and non-RAS inhibitor groups (HR = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.93, P = 0.006), respectively. Among non-RAS agents, CCB group had the highest incidence of NOD (21.72 per 100 persons per year). Comparisons between CCB sub-groups revealed the highest NOD incidence for nifedipine, followed by amlodipine and felodipine. NOD incidences in β-blockers and diuretics groups (11.70 and 10.50 per 100 persons per year, respectively) were not significantly different from valsartan group. Compared with non-RAS inhibitors, particularly CCBs, valsartan could significantly reduce the incidence of NOD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信