在猪模型中,远程缺血预处理可以延长低温循环停止的允许时间。

Caius Mustonen, Hannu-Pekka Honkanen, Tuomas Anttila, Johanna Herajärvi, Fredrik Yannopoulos, Tuomas Mäkelä, Timo Kaakinen, Vesa Anttila, Tatu Juvonen
{"title":"在猪模型中,远程缺血预处理可以延长低温循环停止的允许时间。","authors":"Caius Mustonen,&nbsp;Hannu-Pekka Honkanen,&nbsp;Tuomas Anttila,&nbsp;Johanna Herajärvi,&nbsp;Fredrik Yannopoulos,&nbsp;Tuomas Mäkelä,&nbsp;Timo Kaakinen,&nbsp;Vesa Anttila,&nbsp;Tatu Juvonen","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2019.1629005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> The hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) is still of paramount importance in aortic arch surgery, but the safe period of the arrest is limited. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) prepares the cerebral tissue for ischaemic insult. Prolongation of the permissible period of HCA with RIPC may have a major impact on the outcome of aortic operations requiring cessation of blood flow by decreasing the rate of neurological deficits. <i>Design</i>. Twenty pigs were randomised into the RIPC group (<i>n</i>  =  10) and the control group (<i>n</i>  =  10). The RIPC group underwent four cycles of transient hind limb ischaemia. Both groups underwent cooling with cardiopulmonary bypass to 11 °C followed by a 45-minute HCA and re-warming to 36 °C. Cerebral blood flow was measured with a transit time ultrasonic flowmeter from the right common carotid artery, and the arteriovenous oxygen difference was calculated from sagittal sinus and arterial blood samples. Measurements were taken at several time points during cooling and warming. Temperature coefficient (Q10) was calculated to determine estimated permissible periods of HCA. <i>Results.</i> The Q10 was 2.27 (1.98-2.58) for the RIPC group and 1.87 (1.61-2.25) for the control group. The permissible period of HCA at 18 °C was 26 minutes (20-33) in the RIPC group and 17 minutes (13-25) in the control group (<i>p</i> = .063)(Data expressed in medians and interquartile ranges). <i>Conclusions.</i> RIPC tends to suppress cerebral metabolism during cooling with cardiopulmonary bypass and may prolong estimated permissible period of HCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":137876,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","volume":" ","pages":"192-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14017431.2019.1629005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote ischaemic preconditioning may prolong permissible period of hypothermic circulatory arrest in a porcine model<sup />.\",\"authors\":\"Caius Mustonen,&nbsp;Hannu-Pekka Honkanen,&nbsp;Tuomas Anttila,&nbsp;Johanna Herajärvi,&nbsp;Fredrik Yannopoulos,&nbsp;Tuomas Mäkelä,&nbsp;Timo Kaakinen,&nbsp;Vesa Anttila,&nbsp;Tatu Juvonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14017431.2019.1629005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> The hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) is still of paramount importance in aortic arch surgery, but the safe period of the arrest is limited. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) prepares the cerebral tissue for ischaemic insult. Prolongation of the permissible period of HCA with RIPC may have a major impact on the outcome of aortic operations requiring cessation of blood flow by decreasing the rate of neurological deficits. <i>Design</i>. Twenty pigs were randomised into the RIPC group (<i>n</i>  =  10) and the control group (<i>n</i>  =  10). The RIPC group underwent four cycles of transient hind limb ischaemia. Both groups underwent cooling with cardiopulmonary bypass to 11 °C followed by a 45-minute HCA and re-warming to 36 °C. Cerebral blood flow was measured with a transit time ultrasonic flowmeter from the right common carotid artery, and the arteriovenous oxygen difference was calculated from sagittal sinus and arterial blood samples. Measurements were taken at several time points during cooling and warming. Temperature coefficient (Q10) was calculated to determine estimated permissible periods of HCA. <i>Results.</i> The Q10 was 2.27 (1.98-2.58) for the RIPC group and 1.87 (1.61-2.25) for the control group. The permissible period of HCA at 18 °C was 26 minutes (20-33) in the RIPC group and 17 minutes (13-25) in the control group (<i>p</i> = .063)(Data expressed in medians and interquartile ranges). <i>Conclusions.</i> RIPC tends to suppress cerebral metabolism during cooling with cardiopulmonary bypass and may prolong estimated permissible period of HCA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":137876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"192-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14017431.2019.1629005\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2019.1629005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2019.1629005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目标。低温循环停搏(HCA)在主动脉弓手术中仍然是最重要的,但安全停搏的时间是有限的。远程缺血预处理(RIPC)为脑组织缺血损伤做准备。延长HCA与RIPC的允许时间可能会对需要停止血流的主动脉手术的结果产生重大影响,因为它降低了神经功能缺陷的发生率。设计。20头猪随机分为RIPC组(n = 10)和对照组(n = 10)。RIPC组经历了4个周期的短暂性后肢缺血。两组患者均行体外循环降温至11℃,随后进行45分钟HCA,再升温至36℃。右颈总动脉通过时间超声流量计测量脑血流量,矢状窦血和动脉血计算动静脉氧差。在降温和升温的几个时间点进行测量。计算温度系数(Q10)以确定HCA的估计允许时间。结果。RIPC组和对照组的Q10分别为2.27(1.98 ~ 2.58)和1.87(1.61 ~ 2.25)。RIPC组在18°C下允许的HCA时间为26分钟(20-33分钟),对照组为17分钟(13-25分钟)(p = 0.063)(数据以中位数和四分位数范围表示)。结论。在体外循环降温过程中,RIPC倾向于抑制脑代谢,并可能延长HCA的估计允许时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote ischaemic preconditioning may prolong permissible period of hypothermic circulatory arrest in a porcine model.

Objectives. The hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) is still of paramount importance in aortic arch surgery, but the safe period of the arrest is limited. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) prepares the cerebral tissue for ischaemic insult. Prolongation of the permissible period of HCA with RIPC may have a major impact on the outcome of aortic operations requiring cessation of blood flow by decreasing the rate of neurological deficits. Design. Twenty pigs were randomised into the RIPC group (n  =  10) and the control group (n  =  10). The RIPC group underwent four cycles of transient hind limb ischaemia. Both groups underwent cooling with cardiopulmonary bypass to 11 °C followed by a 45-minute HCA and re-warming to 36 °C. Cerebral blood flow was measured with a transit time ultrasonic flowmeter from the right common carotid artery, and the arteriovenous oxygen difference was calculated from sagittal sinus and arterial blood samples. Measurements were taken at several time points during cooling and warming. Temperature coefficient (Q10) was calculated to determine estimated permissible periods of HCA. Results. The Q10 was 2.27 (1.98-2.58) for the RIPC group and 1.87 (1.61-2.25) for the control group. The permissible period of HCA at 18 °C was 26 minutes (20-33) in the RIPC group and 17 minutes (13-25) in the control group (p = .063)(Data expressed in medians and interquartile ranges). Conclusions. RIPC tends to suppress cerebral metabolism during cooling with cardiopulmonary bypass and may prolong estimated permissible period of HCA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信