艺术和文化参与中的社会不平等模式:大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国成年人的全国代表性抽样调查结果。

Hei Wan Mak, Rory Coulter, Daisy Fancourt
{"title":"艺术和文化参与中的社会不平等模式:大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国成年人的全国代表性抽样调查结果。","authors":"Hei Wan Mak, Rory Coulter, Daisy Fancourt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>A significant amount of literature indicates the health benefits of arts engagement. However, as this engagement is socially patterned, differential access to and participation in the arts may contribute to social and health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to uncover the patterns of participation in arts activities and engagement with culture and heritage among adults in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and to examine whether such patterns are associated with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We applied latent class analysis to data on arts and cultural participation among 30 695 people in the Understanding Society study. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors for the patterns of activity engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For arts participation, adults were clustered into \"engaged omnivores,\" \"visual and literary arts,\" \"performing arts\" and \"disengaged.\" For cultural engagement, adults were clustered into \"frequently engaged,\" \"infrequently engaged\" and \"rarely engaged.\" Regression analysis showed that the patterns of arts activity were structured by demographic and socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals a social gradient in arts and cultural engagement. Given the health benefits of arts engagement, this suggests the importance of promoting equal access to arts and cultural programmes, to ensure that unequal engagement does not exacerbate health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":92713,"journal":{"name":"Public health panorama : journal of the WHO Regional Office for Europe = Panorama obshchestvennogo zdravookhraneniia","volume":"6 1","pages":"55-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of social inequality in arts and cultural participation: Findings from a nationally representative sample of adults living in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.\",\"authors\":\"Hei Wan Mak, Rory Coulter, Daisy Fancourt\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>A significant amount of literature indicates the health benefits of arts engagement. However, as this engagement is socially patterned, differential access to and participation in the arts may contribute to social and health inequalities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to uncover the patterns of participation in arts activities and engagement with culture and heritage among adults in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and to examine whether such patterns are associated with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We applied latent class analysis to data on arts and cultural participation among 30 695 people in the Understanding Society study. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors for the patterns of activity engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For arts participation, adults were clustered into \\\"engaged omnivores,\\\" \\\"visual and literary arts,\\\" \\\"performing arts\\\" and \\\"disengaged.\\\" For cultural engagement, adults were clustered into \\\"frequently engaged,\\\" \\\"infrequently engaged\\\" and \\\"rarely engaged.\\\" Regression analysis showed that the patterns of arts activity were structured by demographic and socioeconomic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals a social gradient in arts and cultural engagement. Given the health benefits of arts engagement, this suggests the importance of promoting equal access to arts and cultural programmes, to ensure that unequal engagement does not exacerbate health inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public health panorama : journal of the WHO Regional Office for Europe = Panorama obshchestvennogo zdravookhraneniia\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"55-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613128/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public health panorama : journal of the WHO Regional Office for Europe = Panorama obshchestvennogo zdravookhraneniia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health panorama : journal of the WHO Regional Office for Europe = Panorama obshchestvennogo zdravookhraneniia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大量文献表明,参与艺术活动有益健康。然而,由于这种参与是社会模式化的,接触和参与艺术的机会不同可能会造成社会和健康方面的不平等:本研究旨在揭示大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国成年人参与艺术活动、接触文化和遗产的模式,并研究这些模式是否与人口和社会经济特征相关:我们对 "了解社会 "研究中 30 695 人的艺术和文化参与数据进行了潜类分析。方法:我们对 "了解社会 "研究中 30 695 人的艺术和文化参与数据进行了潜类分析,并采用多项式逻辑回归法来确定活动参与模式的预测因素:结果:在艺术参与方面,成人被分为 "参与杂食者"、"视觉和文学艺术"、"表演艺术 "和 "不参与"。在文化参与方面,成人被分为 "经常参与"、"不经常参与 "和 "很少参与"。回归分析表明,艺术活动的模式受人口和社会经济因素的影响:本研究揭示了文化艺术参与的社会梯度。鉴于艺术参与对健康的益处,这表明促进平等参与文化艺术项目的重要性,以确保不平等的参与不会加剧健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of social inequality in arts and cultural participation: Findings from a nationally representative sample of adults living in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Context: A significant amount of literature indicates the health benefits of arts engagement. However, as this engagement is socially patterned, differential access to and participation in the arts may contribute to social and health inequalities.

Objective: This study aimed to uncover the patterns of participation in arts activities and engagement with culture and heritage among adults in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and to examine whether such patterns are associated with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

Methodology: We applied latent class analysis to data on arts and cultural participation among 30 695 people in the Understanding Society study. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors for the patterns of activity engagement.

Results: For arts participation, adults were clustered into "engaged omnivores," "visual and literary arts," "performing arts" and "disengaged." For cultural engagement, adults were clustered into "frequently engaged," "infrequently engaged" and "rarely engaged." Regression analysis showed that the patterns of arts activity were structured by demographic and socioeconomic factors.

Conclusion: This study reveals a social gradient in arts and cultural engagement. Given the health benefits of arts engagement, this suggests the importance of promoting equal access to arts and cultural programmes, to ensure that unequal engagement does not exacerbate health inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信