印度劳动力市场调查的可比性如何?

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Indian Journal of Labour Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s41027-022-00381-x
Rosa Abraham, Anand Shrivastava
{"title":"印度劳动力市场调查的可比性如何?","authors":"Rosa Abraham,&nbsp;Anand Shrivastava","doi":"10.1007/s41027-022-00381-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy's (CMIE) Consumer Pyramid Household surveys have emerged as an important source of regular labour market data for India. Given the differences in methods in data collection between the CMIE and official employment sources, it becomes exceedingly important to establish some comparability between the government and the CMIE datasets. With the release of the official Periodic Labour Force Surveys for 2017-18, we now have an overlap between the official datasets and CMIE datasets. In this paper, we examine the extent of comparability of labour force estimates from these two datasets. We find that employment estimates for men are broadly comparable. However, for women, there is a consistent divergence, with CMIE estimates of women's workforce participation lower than that of NSS-PLFS. We find that irrespective of the reference period used in the PLFS estimation of employment statuses, there is no convergence with the CMIE employment estimate for women's employment. Moreover, the mismatch in CMIE-PLFS estimates occurs across all types of women's employment and irrespective of what reference period of employment (in official data) is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":34915,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Labour Economics","volume":" ","pages":"321-346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288665/pdf/","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Comparable are India's Labour Market Surveys?\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Abraham,&nbsp;Anand Shrivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41027-022-00381-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy's (CMIE) Consumer Pyramid Household surveys have emerged as an important source of regular labour market data for India. Given the differences in methods in data collection between the CMIE and official employment sources, it becomes exceedingly important to establish some comparability between the government and the CMIE datasets. With the release of the official Periodic Labour Force Surveys for 2017-18, we now have an overlap between the official datasets and CMIE datasets. In this paper, we examine the extent of comparability of labour force estimates from these two datasets. We find that employment estimates for men are broadly comparable. However, for women, there is a consistent divergence, with CMIE estimates of women's workforce participation lower than that of NSS-PLFS. We find that irrespective of the reference period used in the PLFS estimation of employment statuses, there is no convergence with the CMIE employment estimate for women's employment. Moreover, the mismatch in CMIE-PLFS estimates occurs across all types of women's employment and irrespective of what reference period of employment (in official data) is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Labour Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"321-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9288665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Labour Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00381-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00381-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

印度经济监测中心(CMIE)的消费者金字塔家庭调查已成为印度定期劳动力市场数据的重要来源。鉴于CMIE和官方就业来源在数据收集方法上的差异,在政府和CMIE数据集之间建立一些可比性就变得非常重要。随着2017-18年官方定期劳动力调查的发布,我们现在在官方数据集和CMIE数据集之间有重叠。在本文中,我们检验了这两个数据集的劳动力估计的可比性程度。我们发现,男性的就业估计大致上具有可比性。然而,对于妇女,存在一致的分歧,CMIE对妇女劳动力参与的估计低于NSS-PLFS的估计。我们发现,无论PLFS对就业状况的估计使用的参考时期如何,对妇女就业的估计与CMIE的就业估计没有趋同。此外,CMIE-PLFS估计的不匹配发生在所有类型的妇女就业中,无论使用何种就业参考期(官方数据)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Comparable are India's Labour Market Surveys?

How Comparable are India's Labour Market Surveys?

How Comparable are India's Labour Market Surveys?

How Comparable are India's Labour Market Surveys?

The Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy's (CMIE) Consumer Pyramid Household surveys have emerged as an important source of regular labour market data for India. Given the differences in methods in data collection between the CMIE and official employment sources, it becomes exceedingly important to establish some comparability between the government and the CMIE datasets. With the release of the official Periodic Labour Force Surveys for 2017-18, we now have an overlap between the official datasets and CMIE datasets. In this paper, we examine the extent of comparability of labour force estimates from these two datasets. We find that employment estimates for men are broadly comparable. However, for women, there is a consistent divergence, with CMIE estimates of women's workforce participation lower than that of NSS-PLFS. We find that irrespective of the reference period used in the PLFS estimation of employment statuses, there is no convergence with the CMIE employment estimate for women's employment. Moreover, the mismatch in CMIE-PLFS estimates occurs across all types of women's employment and irrespective of what reference period of employment (in official data) is used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Labour Economics
Indian Journal of Labour Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Labour Economics (IJLE) is one of the few prominent Journals of its kind from South Asia. It provides eminent economists and academicians an exclusive forum for an analysis and understanding of issues pertaining to labour economics, industrial relations including supply and demand of labour services, personnel economics, distribution of income, unions and collective bargaining, applied and policy issues in labour economics, and labour markets and demographics. The journal includes peer reviewed articles, research notes, sections on promising new theoretical developments, comparative labour market policies or subjects that have the attention of labour economists and labour market students in general, particularly in the context of India and other developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信