日本氯氮平所致粒细胞缺乏症患者外周血源性单核细胞的氯氮平特异性增殖反应

Takeo Saito, Toru Usui, Hiroshi Inada, Izuru Miyawaki, Kentaro Mizuno, Masashi Ikeda, Nakao Iwata
{"title":"日本氯氮平所致粒细胞缺乏症患者外周血源性单核细胞的氯氮平特异性增殖反应","authors":"Takeo Saito,&nbsp;Toru Usui,&nbsp;Hiroshi Inada,&nbsp;Izuru Miyawaki,&nbsp;Kentaro Mizuno,&nbsp;Masashi Ikeda,&nbsp;Nakao Iwata","doi":"10.1177/02698811221112937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although clozapine-induced granulocytopenia (CIG) is less severe than clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA), and some patients with CIG may not go on to develop serious complications, clozapine is discontinued in cases of both CIA and CIG. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of CIA/CIG could provide better management of clozapine therapy. Recently, as a mechanistic insight into adaptive immune systems, European groups reported clozapine-specific proliferative responses and clozapine-specific T cells using blood taken from patients with CIA and/or CIG.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of our study are to support this mechanistic evidence and to investigate the difference in the lymphocyte response to clozapine between patients with CIG and those with CIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lymphocyte stimulation tests (LSTs) were conducted using CD25-positive cell-depleted peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from blood of four Japanese patients with CIA, four patients with CIG, and nine clozapine-tolerant subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three of four patients with CIA and one of four patients with CIG showed proliferative responses to clozapine with a stimulation index of greater than 2. In contrast, none of the nine clozapine-tolerant subjects showed any response to clozapine. Olanzapine did not stimulate PBMCs of patients with CIA, patients with CIG, or clozapine-tolerant subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clozapine- and CIA-specific lymphocyte reactions in a Japanese population provided supportive evidence that the pathogenesis of CIA is based on adaptive immune reactions. In addition, patients with CIG who show a positive response to an LST may at the very least not be chosen for clozapine-rechallenge and further prospective studies are desirable to verify this hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":156490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1087-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clozapine-specific proliferative response of peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells in Japanese patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis.\",\"authors\":\"Takeo Saito,&nbsp;Toru Usui,&nbsp;Hiroshi Inada,&nbsp;Izuru Miyawaki,&nbsp;Kentaro Mizuno,&nbsp;Masashi Ikeda,&nbsp;Nakao Iwata\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811221112937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although clozapine-induced granulocytopenia (CIG) is less severe than clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA), and some patients with CIG may not go on to develop serious complications, clozapine is discontinued in cases of both CIA and CIG. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of CIA/CIG could provide better management of clozapine therapy. Recently, as a mechanistic insight into adaptive immune systems, European groups reported clozapine-specific proliferative responses and clozapine-specific T cells using blood taken from patients with CIA and/or CIG.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of our study are to support this mechanistic evidence and to investigate the difference in the lymphocyte response to clozapine between patients with CIG and those with CIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lymphocyte stimulation tests (LSTs) were conducted using CD25-positive cell-depleted peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from blood of four Japanese patients with CIA, four patients with CIG, and nine clozapine-tolerant subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three of four patients with CIA and one of four patients with CIG showed proliferative responses to clozapine with a stimulation index of greater than 2. In contrast, none of the nine clozapine-tolerant subjects showed any response to clozapine. Olanzapine did not stimulate PBMCs of patients with CIA, patients with CIG, or clozapine-tolerant subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clozapine- and CIA-specific lymphocyte reactions in a Japanese population provided supportive evidence that the pathogenesis of CIA is based on adaptive immune reactions. In addition, patients with CIG who show a positive response to an LST may at the very least not be chosen for clozapine-rechallenge and further prospective studies are desirable to verify this hypothesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":156490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1087-1094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811221112937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811221112937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:虽然氯氮平诱导的粒细胞减少症(CIG)不如氯氮平诱导的粒细胞缺乏症(CIA)严重,而且一些CIG患者可能不会继续发展成严重的并发症,但在CIA和CIG的病例中,氯氮平是停药的。了解CIA/CIG的致病机制可以为氯氮平治疗提供更好的管理。最近,作为对适应性免疫系统的机制洞察,欧洲研究小组报道了氯氮平特异性增殖反应和氯氮平特异性T细胞,这些细胞来自CIA和/或CIG患者的血液。目的:本研究的目的是支持这一机制证据,并探讨CIG和CIA患者淋巴细胞对氯氮平反应的差异。方法:采用从4例日本CIA患者、4例CIG患者和9例氯氮平耐受患者的血液中分离的cd25阳性的外周血源性单核细胞(PBMCs)进行淋巴细胞刺激试验(LSTs)。结果:4例CIA患者中有3例,4例CIG患者中有1例对氯氮平有增生性反应,刺激指数大于2。相比之下,九名氯氮平耐受的受试者中没有人对氯氮平有任何反应。奥氮平没有刺激CIA患者、CIG患者或氯氮平耐受受试者的pbmc。结论:日本人群中氯氮平和CIA特异性淋巴细胞反应为CIA的发病机制是基于适应性免疫反应提供了支持性证据。此外,对LST表现出阳性反应的CIG患者可能至少不会被选择进行氯氮平再挑战,并且需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clozapine-specific proliferative response of peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells in Japanese patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis.

Background: Although clozapine-induced granulocytopenia (CIG) is less severe than clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA), and some patients with CIG may not go on to develop serious complications, clozapine is discontinued in cases of both CIA and CIG. Understanding the pathogenic mechanisms of CIA/CIG could provide better management of clozapine therapy. Recently, as a mechanistic insight into adaptive immune systems, European groups reported clozapine-specific proliferative responses and clozapine-specific T cells using blood taken from patients with CIA and/or CIG.

Aims: The aims of our study are to support this mechanistic evidence and to investigate the difference in the lymphocyte response to clozapine between patients with CIG and those with CIA.

Methods: Lymphocyte stimulation tests (LSTs) were conducted using CD25-positive cell-depleted peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from blood of four Japanese patients with CIA, four patients with CIG, and nine clozapine-tolerant subjects.

Results: Three of four patients with CIA and one of four patients with CIG showed proliferative responses to clozapine with a stimulation index of greater than 2. In contrast, none of the nine clozapine-tolerant subjects showed any response to clozapine. Olanzapine did not stimulate PBMCs of patients with CIA, patients with CIG, or clozapine-tolerant subjects.

Conclusions: Clozapine- and CIA-specific lymphocyte reactions in a Japanese population provided supportive evidence that the pathogenesis of CIA is based on adaptive immune reactions. In addition, patients with CIG who show a positive response to an LST may at the very least not be chosen for clozapine-rechallenge and further prospective studies are desirable to verify this hypothesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信