用于风险评估的毒物表观遗传学:缩小基础科学与监管科学之间的差距。

IF 3.2 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Epigenetics Insights Pub Date : 2022-07-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25168657221113149
Anne Le Goff, Séverine Louvel, Henri Boullier, Patrick Allard
{"title":"用于风险评估的毒物表观遗传学:缩小基础科学与监管科学之间的差距。","authors":"Anne Le Goff, Séverine Louvel, Henri Boullier, Patrick Allard","doi":"10.1177/25168657221113149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Toxicoepigenetics examines the health effects of environmental exposure associated with, or mediated by, changes in the epigenome. Despite high expectations, toxicoepigenomic data and methods have yet to become significantly utilized in chemical risk assessment. This article draws on a social science framework to highlight hitherto overlooked structural barriers to the incorporation of toxicoepigenetics in risk assessment and to propose ways forward. The present barriers stem not only from the lack of maturity of the field but also from differences in constraints and standards between the data produced by toxicoepigenetics and the regulatory science data that risk assessment processes require. Criteria and strategies that frame the validation of knowledge used for regulatory purposes limit the application of basic research in toxicoepigenetics toward risk assessment. First, the need in regulatory toxicology for standardized methods that form a consensus between regulatory agencies, basic research, and the industry conflicts with the wealth of heterogeneous data in toxicoepigenetics. Second, molecular epigenetic data do not readily translate into typical toxicological endpoints. Third, toxicoepigenetics investigates new forms of toxicity, in particular low-dose and long-term effects, that do not align well with the traditional framework of regulatory toxicology. We propose that increasing the usefulness of epigenetic data for risk assessment will require deliberate efforts on the part of the toxicoepigenetics community in 4 areas: fostering the understanding of epigenetics among risk assessors, developing knowledge infrastructure to demonstrate applicability, facilitating the normalization and exchange of data, and opening the field to other stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":41996,"journal":{"name":"Epigenetics Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/65/10.1177_25168657221113149.PMC9290111.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicoepigenetics for Risk Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Basic and Regulatory Science.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Le Goff, Séverine Louvel, Henri Boullier, Patrick Allard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25168657221113149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Toxicoepigenetics examines the health effects of environmental exposure associated with, or mediated by, changes in the epigenome. Despite high expectations, toxicoepigenomic data and methods have yet to become significantly utilized in chemical risk assessment. This article draws on a social science framework to highlight hitherto overlooked structural barriers to the incorporation of toxicoepigenetics in risk assessment and to propose ways forward. The present barriers stem not only from the lack of maturity of the field but also from differences in constraints and standards between the data produced by toxicoepigenetics and the regulatory science data that risk assessment processes require. Criteria and strategies that frame the validation of knowledge used for regulatory purposes limit the application of basic research in toxicoepigenetics toward risk assessment. First, the need in regulatory toxicology for standardized methods that form a consensus between regulatory agencies, basic research, and the industry conflicts with the wealth of heterogeneous data in toxicoepigenetics. Second, molecular epigenetic data do not readily translate into typical toxicological endpoints. Third, toxicoepigenetics investigates new forms of toxicity, in particular low-dose and long-term effects, that do not align well with the traditional framework of regulatory toxicology. We propose that increasing the usefulness of epigenetic data for risk assessment will require deliberate efforts on the part of the toxicoepigenetics community in 4 areas: fostering the understanding of epigenetics among risk assessors, developing knowledge infrastructure to demonstrate applicability, facilitating the normalization and exchange of data, and opening the field to other stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epigenetics Insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/65/10.1177_25168657221113149.PMC9290111.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epigenetics Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25168657221113149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenetics Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25168657221113149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毒物表观遗传学研究与表观基因组变化相关或由表观基因组变化介导的环境暴露对健康的影响。尽管人们对毒理表观基因组学寄予厚望,但其数据和方法尚未在化学品风险评估中得到广泛应用。本文以社会科学框架为基础,强调了将毒理表观遗传学纳入风险评估过程中迄今被忽视的结构性障碍,并提出了前进的方向。目前的障碍不仅源于该领域的不成熟,还源于毒理表观遗传学产生的数据与风险评估过程所需的监管科学数据之间在限制和标准上的差异。对用于监管目的的知识进行验证的标准和策略限制了毒理表观遗传学基础研究在风险评估中的应用。首先,监管毒理学需要在监管机构、基础研究和行业之间形成共识的标准化方法,这与毒理表观遗传学的大量异质数据相冲突。其次,分子表观遗传学数据不易转化为典型的毒理学终点。第三,毒理表观遗传学研究新形式的毒性,特别是低剂量和长期效应,这与传统的毒理学监管框架并不一致。我们建议,要提高表观遗传学数据在风险评估中的实用性,毒理表观遗传学界需要在以下四个方面做出深思熟虑的努力:促进风险评估人员对表观遗传学的了解;开发知识基础设施以证明其适用性;促进数据的规范化和交换;以及向其他利益相关者开放该领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toxicoepigenetics for Risk Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Basic and Regulatory Science.

Toxicoepigenetics examines the health effects of environmental exposure associated with, or mediated by, changes in the epigenome. Despite high expectations, toxicoepigenomic data and methods have yet to become significantly utilized in chemical risk assessment. This article draws on a social science framework to highlight hitherto overlooked structural barriers to the incorporation of toxicoepigenetics in risk assessment and to propose ways forward. The present barriers stem not only from the lack of maturity of the field but also from differences in constraints and standards between the data produced by toxicoepigenetics and the regulatory science data that risk assessment processes require. Criteria and strategies that frame the validation of knowledge used for regulatory purposes limit the application of basic research in toxicoepigenetics toward risk assessment. First, the need in regulatory toxicology for standardized methods that form a consensus between regulatory agencies, basic research, and the industry conflicts with the wealth of heterogeneous data in toxicoepigenetics. Second, molecular epigenetic data do not readily translate into typical toxicological endpoints. Third, toxicoepigenetics investigates new forms of toxicity, in particular low-dose and long-term effects, that do not align well with the traditional framework of regulatory toxicology. We propose that increasing the usefulness of epigenetic data for risk assessment will require deliberate efforts on the part of the toxicoepigenetics community in 4 areas: fostering the understanding of epigenetics among risk assessors, developing knowledge infrastructure to demonstrate applicability, facilitating the normalization and exchange of data, and opening the field to other stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenetics Insights
Epigenetics Insights GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信