{"title":"内源性眼内炎常规前玻璃体活检培养阳性率-À-vis。","authors":"Vivek Pravin Dave, Nidhi Vithalani, Esther Sheba, Joveeta Joseph, Avinash Pathengay","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the comparison of the culture positivity rates of deep vitreous biopsy under air and conventional anterior vitreous biopsy in endogenous endophthalmitis.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>A retrospective, consecutive, comparative series including cases of endogenous endophthalmitis from January 2014 to January 2021. They were divided into those where conventional anterior vitreous biopsy was taken and those where a deep biopsy was taken under air (DBA group). The culture positivity rate among the two groups was compared, and factors affecting the same were analyzed by a regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 140 eyes in the conventional anterior vitreous biopsy group and 44 eyes in the DBA group. Sex, age, duration of symptoms, underlying systemic illness, presenting vision in logMAR, and total number of vitreous interventions were comparable between the two groups. Visual outcome was better in patients undergoing DBA as compared with those who underwent conventional anterior vitreous biopsy , (1.28 ± 1.01 logMAR, 20/380 vs. 1.88 ± 1.33 logMAR, 20/1,500, P = 0.03). No case in the DBA group developed retinal detachment or any complication attributable to the technique. In the conventional anterior vitreous biopsy group, the culture positivity was seen in 43/140 samples (30.71%), and in the DBA group, it was noted in 29/44 samples (65.9%). Taking a DBA was the only factor that was significant both in bivariate (odds ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 2.12-8.95, P < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.02, 95% confidence interval 3.1-7.43, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitreous sampling can be performed from the deep vitreous cavity in endogenous endophthalmitis safely and effectively under air infusion, improving the culture positivity rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":377573,"journal":{"name":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"2128-2133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CULTURE POSITIVITY RATES OF DEEP VITREOUS BIOPSY UNDER AIR VIS-À-VIS CONVENTIONAL ANTERIOR VITREOUS BIOPSY IN ENDOGENOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Pravin Dave, Nidhi Vithalani, Esther Sheba, Joveeta Joseph, Avinash Pathengay\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the comparison of the culture positivity rates of deep vitreous biopsy under air and conventional anterior vitreous biopsy in endogenous endophthalmitis.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>A retrospective, consecutive, comparative series including cases of endogenous endophthalmitis from January 2014 to January 2021. They were divided into those where conventional anterior vitreous biopsy was taken and those where a deep biopsy was taken under air (DBA group). The culture positivity rate among the two groups was compared, and factors affecting the same were analyzed by a regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 140 eyes in the conventional anterior vitreous biopsy group and 44 eyes in the DBA group. Sex, age, duration of symptoms, underlying systemic illness, presenting vision in logMAR, and total number of vitreous interventions were comparable between the two groups. Visual outcome was better in patients undergoing DBA as compared with those who underwent conventional anterior vitreous biopsy , (1.28 ± 1.01 logMAR, 20/380 vs. 1.88 ± 1.33 logMAR, 20/1,500, P = 0.03). No case in the DBA group developed retinal detachment or any complication attributable to the technique. In the conventional anterior vitreous biopsy group, the culture positivity was seen in 43/140 samples (30.71%), and in the DBA group, it was noted in 29/44 samples (65.9%). Taking a DBA was the only factor that was significant both in bivariate (odds ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 2.12-8.95, P < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.02, 95% confidence interval 3.1-7.43, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitreous sampling can be performed from the deep vitreous cavity in endogenous endophthalmitis safely and effectively under air infusion, improving the culture positivity rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":377573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2128-2133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较空气下深层玻璃体活检与常规玻璃体前路活检治疗内源性眼内炎的培养阳性率。资料:2014年1月至2021年1月的回顾性、连续、比较系列,包括内源性眼内炎病例。分为常规前玻璃体活检组和空气下深度活检组(DBA组)。比较两组的培养阳性率,并对影响培养阳性率的因素进行回归分析。结果:常规玻璃体前活检组140只眼,DBA组44只眼。两组患者的性别、年龄、症状持续时间、潜在全身性疾病、logMAR中出现视力以及玻璃体干预的总次数具有可比性。与常规玻璃体前路活检患者相比,DBA患者的视觉效果更好(1.28±1.01 logMAR, 20/380 vs. 1.88±1.33 logMAR, 20/ 1500, P = 0.03)。DBA组中没有一例发生视网膜脱离或任何可归因于该技术的并发症。常规玻璃体前活检组培养阳性43/140例(30.71%),DBA组培养阳性29/44例(65.9%)。在双变量分析(优势比4.36,95%置信区间2.12-8.95,P < 0.0001)和多变量分析(优势比4.02,95%置信区间3.1-7.43,P < 0.0001)中,聘请DBA是唯一显著的因素。结论:内源性眼内炎在空气灌注下可安全有效地从眼内炎玻璃体深部取样,提高了培养阳性率。
CULTURE POSITIVITY RATES OF DEEP VITREOUS BIOPSY UNDER AIR VIS-À-VIS CONVENTIONAL ANTERIOR VITREOUS BIOPSY IN ENDOGENOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS.
Purpose: To describe the comparison of the culture positivity rates of deep vitreous biopsy under air and conventional anterior vitreous biopsy in endogenous endophthalmitis.
Materials: A retrospective, consecutive, comparative series including cases of endogenous endophthalmitis from January 2014 to January 2021. They were divided into those where conventional anterior vitreous biopsy was taken and those where a deep biopsy was taken under air (DBA group). The culture positivity rate among the two groups was compared, and factors affecting the same were analyzed by a regression analysis.
Results: There were 140 eyes in the conventional anterior vitreous biopsy group and 44 eyes in the DBA group. Sex, age, duration of symptoms, underlying systemic illness, presenting vision in logMAR, and total number of vitreous interventions were comparable between the two groups. Visual outcome was better in patients undergoing DBA as compared with those who underwent conventional anterior vitreous biopsy , (1.28 ± 1.01 logMAR, 20/380 vs. 1.88 ± 1.33 logMAR, 20/1,500, P = 0.03). No case in the DBA group developed retinal detachment or any complication attributable to the technique. In the conventional anterior vitreous biopsy group, the culture positivity was seen in 43/140 samples (30.71%), and in the DBA group, it was noted in 29/44 samples (65.9%). Taking a DBA was the only factor that was significant both in bivariate (odds ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 2.12-8.95, P < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.02, 95% confidence interval 3.1-7.43, P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Vitreous sampling can be performed from the deep vitreous cavity in endogenous endophthalmitis safely and effectively under air infusion, improving the culture positivity rates.