双语婴儿的多实验室研究:探索婴儿引导言语的偏好。

IF 15.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Krista Byers-Heinlein, Angeline Sin Mei Tsui, Christina Bergmann, Alexis K Black, Anna Brown, Maria Julia Carbajal, Samantha Durrant, Christopher T Fennell, Anne-Caroline Fiévet, Michael C Frank, Anja Gampe, Judit Gervain, Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez, J Kiley Hamlin, Naomi Havron, Mikołaj Hernik, Shila Kerr, Hilary Killam, Kelsey Klassen, Jessica E Kosie, Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Casey Lew-Williams, Liquan Liu, Nivedita Mani, Caterina Marino, Meghan Mastroberardino, Victoria Mateu, Claire Noble, Adriel John Orena, Linda Polka, Christine E Potter, Melanie Schreiner, Leher Singh, Melanie Soderstrom, Megha Sundara, Connor Waddell, Janet F Werker, Stephanie Wermelinger
{"title":"双语婴儿的多实验室研究:探索婴儿引导言语的偏好。","authors":"Krista Byers-Heinlein, Angeline Sin Mei Tsui, Christina Bergmann, Alexis K Black, Anna Brown, Maria Julia Carbajal, Samantha Durrant, Christopher T Fennell, Anne-Caroline Fiévet, Michael C Frank, Anja Gampe, Judit Gervain, Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez, J Kiley Hamlin, Naomi Havron, Mikołaj Hernik, Shila Kerr, Hilary Killam, Kelsey Klassen, Jessica E Kosie, Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Casey Lew-Williams, Liquan Liu, Nivedita Mani, Caterina Marino, Meghan Mastroberardino, Victoria Mateu, Claire Noble, Adriel John Orena, Linda Polka, Christine E Potter, Melanie Schreiner, Leher Singh, Melanie Soderstrom, Megha Sundara, Connor Waddell, Janet F Werker, Stephanie Wermelinger","doi":"10.1177/2515245920974622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From the earliest months of life, infants prefer listening to and learn better from infant-directed speech (IDS) than adult-directed speech (ADS). Yet, IDS differs within communities, across languages, and across cultures, both in form and in prevalence. This large-scale, multi-site study used the diversity of bilingual infant experiences to explore the impact of different types of linguistic experience on infants' IDS preference. As part of the multi-lab ManyBabies 1 project, we compared lab-matched samples of 333 bilingual and 385 monolingual infants' preference for North-American English IDS (cf. ManyBabies Consortium, 2020: ManyBabies 1), tested in 17 labs in 7 countries. Those infants were tested in two age groups: 6-9 months (the younger sample) and 12-15 months (the older sample). We found that bilingual and monolingual infants both preferred IDS to ADS, and did not differ in terms of the overall magnitude of this preference. However, amongst bilingual infants who were acquiring North-American English (NAE) as a native language, greater exposure to NAE was associated with a stronger IDS preference, extending the previous finding from ManyBabies 1 that monolinguals learning NAE as a native language showed a stronger preference than infants unexposed to NAE. Together, our findings indicate that IDS preference likely makes a similar contribution to monolingual and bilingual development, and that infants are exquisitely sensitive to the nature and frequency of different types of language input in their early environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55645,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273003/pdf/nihms-1769134.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-lab study of bilingual infants: Exploring the preference for infant-directed speech.\",\"authors\":\"Krista Byers-Heinlein, Angeline Sin Mei Tsui, Christina Bergmann, Alexis K Black, Anna Brown, Maria Julia Carbajal, Samantha Durrant, Christopher T Fennell, Anne-Caroline Fiévet, Michael C Frank, Anja Gampe, Judit Gervain, Nayeli Gonzalez-Gomez, J Kiley Hamlin, Naomi Havron, Mikołaj Hernik, Shila Kerr, Hilary Killam, Kelsey Klassen, Jessica E Kosie, Ágnes Melinda Kovács, Casey Lew-Williams, Liquan Liu, Nivedita Mani, Caterina Marino, Meghan Mastroberardino, Victoria Mateu, Claire Noble, Adriel John Orena, Linda Polka, Christine E Potter, Melanie Schreiner, Leher Singh, Melanie Soderstrom, Megha Sundara, Connor Waddell, Janet F Werker, Stephanie Wermelinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2515245920974622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>From the earliest months of life, infants prefer listening to and learn better from infant-directed speech (IDS) than adult-directed speech (ADS). Yet, IDS differs within communities, across languages, and across cultures, both in form and in prevalence. This large-scale, multi-site study used the diversity of bilingual infant experiences to explore the impact of different types of linguistic experience on infants' IDS preference. As part of the multi-lab ManyBabies 1 project, we compared lab-matched samples of 333 bilingual and 385 monolingual infants' preference for North-American English IDS (cf. ManyBabies Consortium, 2020: ManyBabies 1), tested in 17 labs in 7 countries. Those infants were tested in two age groups: 6-9 months (the younger sample) and 12-15 months (the older sample). We found that bilingual and monolingual infants both preferred IDS to ADS, and did not differ in terms of the overall magnitude of this preference. However, amongst bilingual infants who were acquiring North-American English (NAE) as a native language, greater exposure to NAE was associated with a stronger IDS preference, extending the previous finding from ManyBabies 1 that monolinguals learning NAE as a native language showed a stronger preference than infants unexposed to NAE. Together, our findings indicate that IDS preference likely makes a similar contribution to monolingual and bilingual development, and that infants are exquisitely sensitive to the nature and frequency of different types of language input in their early environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273003/pdf/nihms-1769134.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920974622\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920974622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从婴儿出生后的最初几个月开始,他们就更喜欢听婴儿引导式言语(IDS),而且从婴儿引导式言语(IDS)中学习的效果比成人引导式言语(ADS)更好。然而,在不同社区、不同语言和不同文化背景下,婴儿引导式言语在形式和流行程度上都存在差异。这项大规模、多地点的研究利用婴儿双语体验的多样性来探讨不同类型的语言体验对婴儿IDS偏好的影响。作为多实验室 "ManyBabies 1 "项目的一部分,我们比较了 333 名双语婴儿和 385 名单语婴儿的实验室匹配样本对北美英语 IDS 的偏好(参见 ManyBabies Consortium, 2020: ManyBabies 1),这些样本在 7 个国家的 17 个实验室进行了测试。这些婴儿分两个年龄组进行测试:6-9 个月(较小的样本)和 12-15 个月(较大的样本)。我们发现,与 ADS 相比,双语婴儿和单语婴儿都更喜欢 IDS,而且在总体偏好程度上没有差异。然而,在将北美英语(NAE)作为母语学习的双语婴儿中,接触北美英语越多的婴儿越偏好IDS,这延续了ManyBabies 1之前的发现,即将北美英语作为母语学习的单语婴儿比未接触北美英语的婴儿表现出更强的偏好。总之,我们的研究结果表明,IDS偏好可能对单语和双语的发展具有类似的作用,而且婴儿对早期环境中不同类型语言输入的性质和频率非常敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multi-lab study of bilingual infants: Exploring the preference for infant-directed speech.

From the earliest months of life, infants prefer listening to and learn better from infant-directed speech (IDS) than adult-directed speech (ADS). Yet, IDS differs within communities, across languages, and across cultures, both in form and in prevalence. This large-scale, multi-site study used the diversity of bilingual infant experiences to explore the impact of different types of linguistic experience on infants' IDS preference. As part of the multi-lab ManyBabies 1 project, we compared lab-matched samples of 333 bilingual and 385 monolingual infants' preference for North-American English IDS (cf. ManyBabies Consortium, 2020: ManyBabies 1), tested in 17 labs in 7 countries. Those infants were tested in two age groups: 6-9 months (the younger sample) and 12-15 months (the older sample). We found that bilingual and monolingual infants both preferred IDS to ADS, and did not differ in terms of the overall magnitude of this preference. However, amongst bilingual infants who were acquiring North-American English (NAE) as a native language, greater exposure to NAE was associated with a stronger IDS preference, extending the previous finding from ManyBabies 1 that monolinguals learning NAE as a native language showed a stronger preference than infants unexposed to NAE. Together, our findings indicate that IDS preference likely makes a similar contribution to monolingual and bilingual development, and that infants are exquisitely sensitive to the nature and frequency of different types of language input in their early environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
0.70%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: In 2021, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science will undergo a transition to become an open access journal. This journal focuses on publishing innovative developments in research methods, practices, and conduct within the field of psychological science. It embraces a wide range of areas and topics and encourages the integration of methodological and analytical questions. The aim of AMPPS is to bring the latest methodological advances to researchers from various disciplines, even those who are not methodological experts. Therefore, the journal seeks submissions that are accessible to readers with different research interests and that represent the diverse research trends within the field of psychological science. The types of content that AMPPS welcomes include articles that communicate advancements in methods, practices, and metascience, as well as empirical scientific best practices. Additionally, tutorials, commentaries, and simulation studies on new techniques and research tools are encouraged. The journal also aims to publish papers that bring advances from specialized subfields to a broader audience. Lastly, AMPPS accepts Registered Replication Reports, which focus on replicating important findings from previously published studies. Overall, the transition of Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science to an open access journal aims to increase accessibility and promote the dissemination of new developments in research methods and practices within the field of psychological science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信