鲁拉西酮与奎硫平治疗年轻双相抑郁症患者的认知障碍:一项随机对照研究。

Xiangyuan Diao, Dan Luo, Dandan Wang, Jianbo Lai, Qunxiao Li, Peifen Zhang, Huimin Huang, Lingling Wu, Shaojia Lu, Shaohua Hu
{"title":"鲁拉西酮与奎硫平治疗年轻双相抑郁症患者的认知障碍:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Xiangyuan Diao,&nbsp;Dan Luo,&nbsp;Dandan Wang,&nbsp;Jianbo Lai,&nbsp;Qunxiao Li,&nbsp;Peifen Zhang,&nbsp;Huimin Huang,&nbsp;Lingling Wu,&nbsp;Shaojia Lu,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu","doi":"10.3390/ph15111403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical efficacy of lurasidone and quetiapine, two commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics for bipolar depression, has been inadequately studied in young patients. In this randomized and controlled study, we aimed to compare the effects of these two drugs on cognitive function, emotional status, and metabolic profiles in children and adolescents with bipolar depression. We recruited young participants (aged 10-17 years old) with a <i>DSM-5</i> diagnosis of bipolar disorder during a depressive episode, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of lurasidone (60 to 120 mg/day) or quetiapine (300 to 600 mg/day) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. All the participants were clinically evaluated on cognitive function using the THINC-it instrument at baseline and week 8, and emotional status was assessed at baseline and the end of week 2, 4, and 8. Additionally, the changes in weight and serum metabolic profiles (triglyceride, cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose) during the trial were also analyzed. In results, a total of 71 patients were randomly assigned to the lurasidone group (<i>n</i> = 35) or the quetiapine group (<i>n</i> = 36), of which 31 patients completed the whole treatment course. After an 8-week follow-up, participants in the lurasidone group showed better performance in the Symbol Check Reaction and Accuracy Tests, when compared to those in the quetiapine group. No inter-group difference was observed in the depression scores, response rate, or remission rate throughout the trial. In addition, there was no significant difference in serum metabolic profiles between the lurasidone group and the quetiapine group, including triglyceride level, cholesterol level, and fasting blood glucose level. However, the quetiapine group presented a more apparent change in body weight than the lurasidone group. In conclusion, the present study provided preliminary evidence that quetiapine and lurasidone had an equivalent anti-depressive effect, and lurasidone appeared to be superior to quetiapine in improving the cognitive function of young patients with bipolar depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":520747,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698487/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lurasidone versus Quetiapine for Cognitive Impairments in Young Patients with Bipolar Depression: A Randomized, Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyuan Diao,&nbsp;Dan Luo,&nbsp;Dandan Wang,&nbsp;Jianbo Lai,&nbsp;Qunxiao Li,&nbsp;Peifen Zhang,&nbsp;Huimin Huang,&nbsp;Lingling Wu,&nbsp;Shaojia Lu,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph15111403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The clinical efficacy of lurasidone and quetiapine, two commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics for bipolar depression, has been inadequately studied in young patients. In this randomized and controlled study, we aimed to compare the effects of these two drugs on cognitive function, emotional status, and metabolic profiles in children and adolescents with bipolar depression. We recruited young participants (aged 10-17 years old) with a <i>DSM-5</i> diagnosis of bipolar disorder during a depressive episode, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of lurasidone (60 to 120 mg/day) or quetiapine (300 to 600 mg/day) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. All the participants were clinically evaluated on cognitive function using the THINC-it instrument at baseline and week 8, and emotional status was assessed at baseline and the end of week 2, 4, and 8. Additionally, the changes in weight and serum metabolic profiles (triglyceride, cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose) during the trial were also analyzed. In results, a total of 71 patients were randomly assigned to the lurasidone group (<i>n</i> = 35) or the quetiapine group (<i>n</i> = 36), of which 31 patients completed the whole treatment course. After an 8-week follow-up, participants in the lurasidone group showed better performance in the Symbol Check Reaction and Accuracy Tests, when compared to those in the quetiapine group. No inter-group difference was observed in the depression scores, response rate, or remission rate throughout the trial. In addition, there was no significant difference in serum metabolic profiles between the lurasidone group and the quetiapine group, including triglyceride level, cholesterol level, and fasting blood glucose level. However, the quetiapine group presented a more apparent change in body weight than the lurasidone group. In conclusion, the present study provided preliminary evidence that quetiapine and lurasidone had an equivalent anti-depressive effect, and lurasidone appeared to be superior to quetiapine in improving the cognitive function of young patients with bipolar depression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9698487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15111403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15111403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

鲁拉西酮和奎硫平这两种治疗双相抑郁症的常用非典型抗精神病药物在年轻患者中的临床疗效研究尚不充分。在这项随机对照研究中,我们旨在比较这两种药物对儿童和青少年双相抑郁症患者的认知功能、情绪状态和代谢谱的影响。我们招募了在抑郁发作期间被DSM-5诊断为双相情感障碍的年轻参与者(10-17岁),然后将他们随机分为两组,分别使用灵活剂量的鲁拉西酮(60 - 120mg /天)或喹硫平(300 - 600mg /天)连续8周进行治疗。在基线和第8周使用THINC-it仪器对所有参与者的认知功能进行临床评估,并在基线和第2、4和8周结束时评估情绪状态。此外,还分析了试验期间体重和血清代谢谱(甘油三酯、胆固醇和空腹血糖)的变化。结果,共71例患者被随机分为鲁拉西酮组(n = 35)和喹硫平组(n = 36),其中31例患者完成了整个疗程。经过8周的随访,与喹硫平组相比,鲁拉西酮组的参与者在符号检查反应和准确性测试中表现更好。在整个试验中,没有观察到抑郁评分、反应率或缓解率的组间差异。此外,鲁拉西酮组和喹硫平组的血清代谢谱,包括甘油三酯水平、胆固醇水平和空腹血糖水平,没有显著差异。然而,奎硫平组的体重变化比鲁拉西酮组更明显。综上所述,本研究提供了喹硫平和鲁拉西酮具有同等抗抑郁作用的初步证据,鲁拉西酮在改善年轻双相抑郁症患者认知功能方面似乎优于喹硫平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lurasidone versus Quetiapine for Cognitive Impairments in Young Patients with Bipolar Depression: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

Lurasidone versus Quetiapine for Cognitive Impairments in Young Patients with Bipolar Depression: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

Lurasidone versus Quetiapine for Cognitive Impairments in Young Patients with Bipolar Depression: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

The clinical efficacy of lurasidone and quetiapine, two commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics for bipolar depression, has been inadequately studied in young patients. In this randomized and controlled study, we aimed to compare the effects of these two drugs on cognitive function, emotional status, and metabolic profiles in children and adolescents with bipolar depression. We recruited young participants (aged 10-17 years old) with a DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar disorder during a depressive episode, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of lurasidone (60 to 120 mg/day) or quetiapine (300 to 600 mg/day) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. All the participants were clinically evaluated on cognitive function using the THINC-it instrument at baseline and week 8, and emotional status was assessed at baseline and the end of week 2, 4, and 8. Additionally, the changes in weight and serum metabolic profiles (triglyceride, cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose) during the trial were also analyzed. In results, a total of 71 patients were randomly assigned to the lurasidone group (n = 35) or the quetiapine group (n = 36), of which 31 patients completed the whole treatment course. After an 8-week follow-up, participants in the lurasidone group showed better performance in the Symbol Check Reaction and Accuracy Tests, when compared to those in the quetiapine group. No inter-group difference was observed in the depression scores, response rate, or remission rate throughout the trial. In addition, there was no significant difference in serum metabolic profiles between the lurasidone group and the quetiapine group, including triglyceride level, cholesterol level, and fasting blood glucose level. However, the quetiapine group presented a more apparent change in body weight than the lurasidone group. In conclusion, the present study provided preliminary evidence that quetiapine and lurasidone had an equivalent anti-depressive effect, and lurasidone appeared to be superior to quetiapine in improving the cognitive function of young patients with bipolar depression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信