Kathryn Freeman, Kathryn Brown, Laura Miller, Tanner Nissly, Jason Ricco, Amanda Weinmann
{"title":"基于“中继”的知识保留:一种新的主动学习技术。","authors":"Kathryn Freeman, Kathryn Brown, Laura Miller, Tanner Nissly, Jason Ricco, Amanda Weinmann","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2022.586676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many residency programs utilize passive didactic lectures despite mixed evidence for knowledge retention. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of \"relay,\" an active-learning technique, as measured by residents' knowledge retention and attitudes compared to traditional format.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Faculty presented lectures to four family medicine residency programs on a randomized schedule. Lectures were followed by a 15-minute question-and-answer (Q&A) session or relay session. A relay is a collaborative, question-based game. The primary outcome was knowledge retention at 3 months, comparing Q&A to relay sessions as measured by a multiple-choice assessment. Responses were only included if a given resident completed knowledge assessments for both Q&A and relay sessions, to allow for intraresident adjustments, in addition to program, training year, and lecturer/topic. Secondary outcomes included residents' self-perceived knowledge and engagement as surveyed by an ordinal scale immediately following the learning session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analysis included 51 responses from 18 unique residents. The adjusted mean knowledge assessment score at 3 months was not statistically different after the relay sessions compared to Q&A (67% vs 60%, respectively; 7% difference, 95% CI: -4 to 18%, <i>P</i>=.20). For the secondary outcomes of learner attitudes (n=143 responses), learners reported greater engagement after the relay sessions compared to Q&A (51% vs 28% \"very engaged\"; overall <i>P</i>=.003), but self-perceived knowledge was not significantly different (overall <i>P</i>=.05, rounded down).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relay technique did not show significant difference in 3-month knowledge retention, nor immediate self-perceived knowledge, despite greater learner self-perceived engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256294/pdf/primer-6-12.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge Retention Using \\\"Relay\\\": A Novel Active-Learning Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Freeman, Kathryn Brown, Laura Miller, Tanner Nissly, Jason Ricco, Amanda Weinmann\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2022.586676\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many residency programs utilize passive didactic lectures despite mixed evidence for knowledge retention. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of \\\"relay,\\\" an active-learning technique, as measured by residents' knowledge retention and attitudes compared to traditional format.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Faculty presented lectures to four family medicine residency programs on a randomized schedule. Lectures were followed by a 15-minute question-and-answer (Q&A) session or relay session. A relay is a collaborative, question-based game. The primary outcome was knowledge retention at 3 months, comparing Q&A to relay sessions as measured by a multiple-choice assessment. Responses were only included if a given resident completed knowledge assessments for both Q&A and relay sessions, to allow for intraresident adjustments, in addition to program, training year, and lecturer/topic. Secondary outcomes included residents' self-perceived knowledge and engagement as surveyed by an ordinal scale immediately following the learning session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary analysis included 51 responses from 18 unique residents. The adjusted mean knowledge assessment score at 3 months was not statistically different after the relay sessions compared to Q&A (67% vs 60%, respectively; 7% difference, 95% CI: -4 to 18%, <i>P</i>=.20). For the secondary outcomes of learner attitudes (n=143 responses), learners reported greater engagement after the relay sessions compared to Q&A (51% vs 28% \\\"very engaged\\\"; overall <i>P</i>=.003), but self-perceived knowledge was not significantly different (overall <i>P</i>=.05, rounded down).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relay technique did not show significant difference in 3-month knowledge retention, nor immediate self-perceived knowledge, despite greater learner self-perceived engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9256294/pdf/primer-6-12.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2022.586676\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2022.586676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:许多住院医师项目利用被动的教学讲座,尽管有不同的证据表明知识保留。本前瞻性研究考察了主动学习技术“接力”的有效性,通过与传统形式相比,居民的知识保留和态度来衡量。方法:教师对四个家庭医学住院医师项目进行随机安排的讲座。讲座之后是15分钟的提问和回答(Q&A)环节或接力环节。接力赛是一种基于问题的协作游戏。主要结果是3个月时的知识保留情况,通过多项选择评估来比较问答和接力环节。只有当一个给定的住院医师完成了问答和接力环节的知识评估,除了项目、培训年份和讲师/主题之外,还允许住院医师进行内部调整时,才会包括回答。次要结果包括居民的自我认知知识和参与,在学习课程后立即通过顺序量表进行调查。结果:初步分析包括来自18位独特居民的51份回复。接力赛后3个月的调整后平均知识评估得分与问答后比较无统计学差异(分别为67% vs 60%;差异为7%,95% CI: -4 ~ 18%, P=.20)。对于学习者态度的次要结果(n=143个回答),与问答相比,学习者在中继会话后报告了更高的参与度(51%对28%“非常投入”;总体P=.003),但自我感知知识差异无统计学意义(总体P=.003)。05,四舍五入)。结论:中继技术在3个月的知识保留和即时自我感知知识方面没有显著差异,尽管学习者自我感知参与程度更高。
Knowledge Retention Using "Relay": A Novel Active-Learning Technique.
Introduction: Many residency programs utilize passive didactic lectures despite mixed evidence for knowledge retention. This prospective study investigated the efficacy of "relay," an active-learning technique, as measured by residents' knowledge retention and attitudes compared to traditional format.
Methods: Faculty presented lectures to four family medicine residency programs on a randomized schedule. Lectures were followed by a 15-minute question-and-answer (Q&A) session or relay session. A relay is a collaborative, question-based game. The primary outcome was knowledge retention at 3 months, comparing Q&A to relay sessions as measured by a multiple-choice assessment. Responses were only included if a given resident completed knowledge assessments for both Q&A and relay sessions, to allow for intraresident adjustments, in addition to program, training year, and lecturer/topic. Secondary outcomes included residents' self-perceived knowledge and engagement as surveyed by an ordinal scale immediately following the learning session.
Results: The primary analysis included 51 responses from 18 unique residents. The adjusted mean knowledge assessment score at 3 months was not statistically different after the relay sessions compared to Q&A (67% vs 60%, respectively; 7% difference, 95% CI: -4 to 18%, P=.20). For the secondary outcomes of learner attitudes (n=143 responses), learners reported greater engagement after the relay sessions compared to Q&A (51% vs 28% "very engaged"; overall P=.003), but self-perceived knowledge was not significantly different (overall P=.05, rounded down).
Conclusions: The relay technique did not show significant difference in 3-month knowledge retention, nor immediate self-perceived knowledge, despite greater learner self-perceived engagement.