慢性肾脏疾病严重程度对当代左主干远分叉病变药物洗脱支架植入术后临床结果的影响:米兰和新东京注册

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yusuke Watanabe, Satoru Mitomo, Toru Naganuma, Kensuke Takagi, Hiroyoshi Kawamoto, Satoshi Matsuoka, Alaide Chieffo, Matteo Montorfano, Sunao Nakamura, Antonio Colombo
{"title":"慢性肾脏疾病严重程度对当代左主干远分叉病变药物洗脱支架植入术后临床结果的影响:米兰和新东京注册","authors":"Yusuke Watanabe,&nbsp;Satoru Mitomo,&nbsp;Toru Naganuma,&nbsp;Kensuke Takagi,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Kawamoto,&nbsp;Satoshi Matsuoka,&nbsp;Alaide Chieffo,&nbsp;Matteo Montorfano,&nbsp;Sunao Nakamura,&nbsp;Antonio Colombo","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2022.2084561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) is not fully understood in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI using cDES for ULMD according to CKD severity based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). <i>Design</i>. We identified 720 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using cDES for ULMD at three high volume centers between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients to the following five groups according to eGFR. Each group was defined as follows: no CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and hemodialysis (HD). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). <i>Results</i>. TLF occurred more frequently in severe CKD and HD group compared with other three groups. <i>Conclusions</i>. The patients who have severe CKD or are on HD, were extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD even with cDES.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after current generation drug-eluting stent implantation for left main distal bifurcation lesions: the Milan and New-Tokyo registry.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Watanabe,&nbsp;Satoru Mitomo,&nbsp;Toru Naganuma,&nbsp;Kensuke Takagi,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Kawamoto,&nbsp;Satoshi Matsuoka,&nbsp;Alaide Chieffo,&nbsp;Matteo Montorfano,&nbsp;Sunao Nakamura,&nbsp;Antonio Colombo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14017431.2022.2084561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) is not fully understood in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI using cDES for ULMD according to CKD severity based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). <i>Design</i>. We identified 720 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using cDES for ULMD at three high volume centers between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients to the following five groups according to eGFR. Each group was defined as follows: no CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>), severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>) and hemodialysis (HD). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). <i>Results</i>. TLF occurred more frequently in severe CKD and HD group compared with other three groups. <i>Conclusions</i>. The patients who have severe CKD or are on HD, were extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD even with cDES.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2022.2084561\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2022.2084561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。在当代药物洗脱支架(cDES)时代,慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)对无保护左主干远分叉病变(ULMD)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后临床结果的影响尚不完全清楚。我们根据肾小球滤过率(eGFR)估计的CKD严重程度,评估了使用cDES治疗ULMD PCI后的临床结果。设计。我们确定了2005年1月至2015年12月在三个高容量中心使用cDES治疗ULMD的720例连续患者。我们根据eGFR将这些患者分为以下五组。各组定义如下:无CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m2≤eGFR)、轻度CKD(45≤eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)、中度CKD(30≤eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2)、重度CKD(15≤eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)和血液透析(HD)。主要终点是3年的靶病变失败(TLF)。TLF定义为心源性死亡、靶区血运重建术(TLR)和心肌梗死(MI)的复合。结果。重度CKD和HD组TLF发生率高于其他三组。结论。患有严重CKD或患有HD的患者,即使有cDES,接受ULMD PCI治疗后的临床结果也更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after current generation drug-eluting stent implantation for left main distal bifurcation lesions: the Milan and New-Tokyo registry.

Objectives. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) is not fully understood in current generation drug eluting stent (cDES) era. We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI using cDES for ULMD according to CKD severity based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Design. We identified 720 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using cDES for ULMD at three high volume centers between January 2005 and December 2015. We divided those patients to the following five groups according to eGFR. Each group was defined as follows: no CKD (60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ eGFR), mild CKD (45 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate CKD (30 ≤ eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2), severe CKD (15 ≤ eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hemodialysis (HD). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction (MI). Results. TLF occurred more frequently in severe CKD and HD group compared with other three groups. Conclusions. The patients who have severe CKD or are on HD, were extremely associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD even with cDES.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信