一项多国、多中心、随机、双盲、主动比较的III期临床试验,评估多奈哌齐透皮贴剂对阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效和安全性。

Hyun Jeong Han, Mee Young Park, Kyung Won Park, Kee Hyung Park, Seong Hye Choi, Hee-Jin Kim, Dong Won Yang, Esther Gunaseli A/P M Ebenezer, Yuan-Han Yang, Gurudev M Kewalram, Seol-Heui Han
{"title":"一项多国、多中心、随机、双盲、主动比较的III期临床试验,评估多奈哌齐透皮贴剂对阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Hyun Jeong Han,&nbsp;Mee Young Park,&nbsp;Kyung Won Park,&nbsp;Kee Hyung Park,&nbsp;Seong Hye Choi,&nbsp;Hee-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Dong Won Yang,&nbsp;Esther Gunaseli A/P M Ebenezer,&nbsp;Yuan-Han Yang,&nbsp;Gurudev M Kewalram,&nbsp;Seol-Heui Han","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Oral administration of cholinesterase inhibitors is often associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects, and so developing an alternative administration route, such as transdermal, is urgently needed. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the IPI-301 donepezil transdermal patch compared with donepezil tablets (control) in mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-arm parallel, multicenter trial included 399 patients, among whom 303 completed the trial. For randomization, the patients were stratified based on previous treatment and donepezil dose; patients in each stratum were randomized to the test and control groups at a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference between the control group and the IPI-301 group, quantified as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of location shift, was 0.00 (95% confidence interval: -1.00 to 1.33), with an upper limit of less than 2.02. The change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score differed significantly between the IPI-301 and control groups (<i>p</i>=0.02). However, the changes in the full-itemized ADCS-ADL scores at week 24 did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the scores for the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change (<i>p</i>=0.9097), Mini-Mental State Examination (<i>p</i>=0.7018), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (<i>p</i>=0.7656), or Clinical Dementia Rating (<i>p</i>=0.9990). Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory test results were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPI-301 was safe and efficacious in improving cognitive function in patients with mild-to-moderate AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":324902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)","volume":" ","pages":"428-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/c6/jcn-18-428.PMC9262446.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Hyun Jeong Han,&nbsp;Mee Young Park,&nbsp;Kyung Won Park,&nbsp;Kee Hyung Park,&nbsp;Seong Hye Choi,&nbsp;Hee-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Dong Won Yang,&nbsp;Esther Gunaseli A/P M Ebenezer,&nbsp;Yuan-Han Yang,&nbsp;Gurudev M Kewalram,&nbsp;Seol-Heui Han\",\"doi\":\"10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Oral administration of cholinesterase inhibitors is often associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects, and so developing an alternative administration route, such as transdermal, is urgently needed. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the IPI-301 donepezil transdermal patch compared with donepezil tablets (control) in mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-arm parallel, multicenter trial included 399 patients, among whom 303 completed the trial. For randomization, the patients were stratified based on previous treatment and donepezil dose; patients in each stratum were randomized to the test and control groups at a 1:1 ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference between the control group and the IPI-301 group, quantified as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of location shift, was 0.00 (95% confidence interval: -1.00 to 1.33), with an upper limit of less than 2.02. The change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score differed significantly between the IPI-301 and control groups (<i>p</i>=0.02). However, the changes in the full-itemized ADCS-ADL scores at week 24 did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the scores for the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change (<i>p</i>=0.9097), Mini-Mental State Examination (<i>p</i>=0.7018), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (<i>p</i>=0.7656), or Clinical Dementia Rating (<i>p</i>=0.9990). Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory test results were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPI-301 was safe and efficacious in improving cognitive function in patients with mild-to-moderate AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"428-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/c6/jcn-18-428.PMC9262446.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:口服胆碱酯酶抑制剂常伴有不良胃肠道反应,因此迫切需要开发一种替代给药途径,如透皮给药。本研究的主要目的是确定IPI-301多奈哌齐透皮贴剂与多奈哌齐片(对照)在轻度至中度可能的阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的疗效和安全性。方法:该前瞻性、随机、双盲、双假、双臂平行、多中心试验纳入399例患者,其中完成试验303例。对于随机化,根据既往治疗和多奈哌齐剂量对患者进行分层;各层患者按1:1的比例随机分为实验组和对照组。结果:对照组与IPI-301组之间的差异,量化为Hodges-Lehmann位置移位估计,为0.00(95%置信区间:-1.00 ~ 1.33),上限小于2.02。IPI-301组与对照组阿兹海默病日常生活活动(ADCS-ADL)评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.02)。然而,在第24周,两组之间ADCS-ADL评分的变化没有显著差异。两组在基于临床医生访谈的变化印象评分(p=0.9097)、迷你精神状态检查(p=0.7018)、神经精神量表(p=0.7656)和临床痴呆评分(p=0.9990)方面均无差异。两组之间的不良事件、生命体征和实验室检测结果具有可比性。结论:IPI-301对改善轻中度AD患者认知功能安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.

A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.

A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.

A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease.

Background and purpose: Oral administration of cholinesterase inhibitors is often associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects, and so developing an alternative administration route, such as transdermal, is urgently needed. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of the IPI-301 donepezil transdermal patch compared with donepezil tablets (control) in mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-arm parallel, multicenter trial included 399 patients, among whom 303 completed the trial. For randomization, the patients were stratified based on previous treatment and donepezil dose; patients in each stratum were randomized to the test and control groups at a 1:1 ratio.

Results: The difference between the control group and the IPI-301 group, quantified as the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of location shift, was 0.00 (95% confidence interval: -1.00 to 1.33), with an upper limit of less than 2.02. The change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score differed significantly between the IPI-301 and control groups (p=0.02). However, the changes in the full-itemized ADCS-ADL scores at week 24 did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the scores for the Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change (p=0.9097), Mini-Mental State Examination (p=0.7018), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (p=0.7656), or Clinical Dementia Rating (p=0.9990). Adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory test results were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: IPI-301 was safe and efficacious in improving cognitive function in patients with mild-to-moderate AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信