严重精神疾病或服用抗精神病药物患者的心血管风险管理:荷兰全科医生中障碍和促进因素的定性研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kirsti Jakobs, Latoya Lautan, Peter Lucassen, Joost Janzing, Jan van Lieshout, Marion C J Biermans, Erik W M A Bischoff
{"title":"严重精神疾病或服用抗精神病药物患者的心血管风险管理:荷兰全科医生中障碍和促进因素的定性研究。","authors":"Kirsti Jakobs,&nbsp;Latoya Lautan,&nbsp;Peter Lucassen,&nbsp;Joost Janzing,&nbsp;Jan van Lieshout,&nbsp;Marion C J Biermans,&nbsp;Erik W M A Bischoff","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2022.2092093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) or receiving treatment with antipsychotics (APs) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) increasingly depends on general practitioners (GPs) because of the shift of mental healthcare from secondary to primary care and the surge of off-label AP prescriptions. Nevertheless, the uptake of patients with SMI/APs in CVRM programmes in Dutch primary care is low.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore which barriers and facilitators GPs foresee when including and treating patients with SMI or using APs in an existing CVRM programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2019, we conducted a qualitative study among 13 Dutch GPs. During individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews a computer-generated list of eligible patients who lacked annual cardiovascular risk (CVR) screening guided the interview. Data was analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main barriers identified were: (i) underestimation of patient CVR and ambivalence to apply risk-lowering strategies such as smoking cessation, (ii) disproportionate burden on GPs in deprived areas, (iii) poor information exchange between GPs and psychiatrists, and (iv) scepticism about patient compliance, especially those with more complex conditions. The main facilitators included: (i) support of GPs through a computer-generated list of eligible patients and (ii) involvement of family or carers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study displays a range of barriers and facilitators anticipated by GPs. These indicate the preconditions required to remove barriers and facilitate GPs, namely adequate recommendations in practice guidelines, improved consultation opportunities with psychiatrists, practical advice to support patient adherence and incentives for practices in deprived areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272927/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular risk management in patients with severe mental illness or taking antipsychotics: A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators among dutch general practitioners.\",\"authors\":\"Kirsti Jakobs,&nbsp;Latoya Lautan,&nbsp;Peter Lucassen,&nbsp;Joost Janzing,&nbsp;Jan van Lieshout,&nbsp;Marion C J Biermans,&nbsp;Erik W M A Bischoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13814788.2022.2092093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) or receiving treatment with antipsychotics (APs) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) increasingly depends on general practitioners (GPs) because of the shift of mental healthcare from secondary to primary care and the surge of off-label AP prescriptions. Nevertheless, the uptake of patients with SMI/APs in CVRM programmes in Dutch primary care is low.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore which barriers and facilitators GPs foresee when including and treating patients with SMI or using APs in an existing CVRM programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2019, we conducted a qualitative study among 13 Dutch GPs. During individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews a computer-generated list of eligible patients who lacked annual cardiovascular risk (CVR) screening guided the interview. Data was analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main barriers identified were: (i) underestimation of patient CVR and ambivalence to apply risk-lowering strategies such as smoking cessation, (ii) disproportionate burden on GPs in deprived areas, (iii) poor information exchange between GPs and psychiatrists, and (iv) scepticism about patient compliance, especially those with more complex conditions. The main facilitators included: (i) support of GPs through a computer-generated list of eligible patients and (ii) involvement of family or carers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study displays a range of barriers and facilitators anticipated by GPs. These indicate the preconditions required to remove barriers and facilitate GPs, namely adequate recommendations in practice guidelines, improved consultation opportunities with psychiatrists, practical advice to support patient adherence and incentives for practices in deprived areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2092093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2092093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:重度精神疾病(SMI)或接受抗精神病药物(APs)治疗的患者发生心血管疾病的风险增加。心血管风险管理(CVRM)越来越依赖于全科医生(gp),因为精神卫生保健从二级保健向初级保健的转变以及标签外AP处方的激增。然而,在荷兰的初级保健机构中,重度精神障碍/ ap患者在crvrm项目中的接受率很低。目的:探讨全科医生在纳入和治疗重度精神障碍患者或在现有的crvrm项目中使用ap时预见到的障碍和促进因素。方法:2019年对13名荷兰全科医生进行定性研究。在个人深入的半结构化访谈中,计算机生成的缺乏年度心血管风险(CVR)筛查的合格患者列表指导了访谈。对数据进行了专题分析。结果:确定的主要障碍是:(i)对患者CVR的低估和采用戒烟等降低风险策略的矛盾心理;(ii)贫困地区全科医生的负担不成比例;(iii)全科医生与精神科医生之间的信息交流不足;(iv)对患者依从性的怀疑,特别是那些病情更复杂的患者。主要的协助因素包括:(i)透过电脑生成合资格病人名单,支援全科医生;及(ii)家属或照顾者的参与。结论:本研究显示了全科医生预期的一系列障碍和促进因素。这些表明了消除障碍和促进全科医生所需的先决条件,即在实践指南中提供充分的建议,改善与精神科医生的咨询机会,支持患者坚持的实用建议以及对贫困地区实践的激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cardiovascular risk management in patients with severe mental illness or taking antipsychotics: A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators among dutch general practitioners.

Cardiovascular risk management in patients with severe mental illness or taking antipsychotics: A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators among dutch general practitioners.

Background: Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) or receiving treatment with antipsychotics (APs) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) increasingly depends on general practitioners (GPs) because of the shift of mental healthcare from secondary to primary care and the surge of off-label AP prescriptions. Nevertheless, the uptake of patients with SMI/APs in CVRM programmes in Dutch primary care is low.

Objectives: To explore which barriers and facilitators GPs foresee when including and treating patients with SMI or using APs in an existing CVRM programme.

Methods: In 2019, we conducted a qualitative study among 13 Dutch GPs. During individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews a computer-generated list of eligible patients who lacked annual cardiovascular risk (CVR) screening guided the interview. Data was analysed thematically.

Results: The main barriers identified were: (i) underestimation of patient CVR and ambivalence to apply risk-lowering strategies such as smoking cessation, (ii) disproportionate burden on GPs in deprived areas, (iii) poor information exchange between GPs and psychiatrists, and (iv) scepticism about patient compliance, especially those with more complex conditions. The main facilitators included: (i) support of GPs through a computer-generated list of eligible patients and (ii) involvement of family or carers.

Conclusion: This study displays a range of barriers and facilitators anticipated by GPs. These indicate the preconditions required to remove barriers and facilitate GPs, namely adequate recommendations in practice guidelines, improved consultation opportunities with psychiatrists, practical advice to support patient adherence and incentives for practices in deprived areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信