选择性非手术治疗腹部刺伤的前瞻性评价:何时可以安全出院?

Natthida Owattanapanich, Camilla Cremonini, Morgan A Schellenberg, Kazuhide Matsushima, Meghan R Lewis, Lydia Lam, Matthew J Martin, Kenji Inaba
{"title":"选择性非手术治疗腹部刺伤的前瞻性评价:何时可以安全出院?","authors":"Natthida Owattanapanich,&nbsp;Camilla Cremonini,&nbsp;Morgan A Schellenberg,&nbsp;Kazuhide Matsushima,&nbsp;Meghan R Lewis,&nbsp;Lydia Lam,&nbsp;Matthew J Martin,&nbsp;Kenji Inaba","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000003733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal observation time required to exclude hollow viscus injury in patients undergoing selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for abdominal stab wounds (SWs) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the safe period of observation required before discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, all patients who sustained an abdominal SW were screened for study inclusion (July 2018 to May 2021). The primary study outcome was time to SNOM failure, defined as the need for surgical intervention after an initial period of observation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 256 consecutive patients with an abdominal SW met the study criteria. The mean age was 33 (26-46) years, and 89% were male. Of all patients, 77% had single SW, and 154 (60%) had an anterior abdominal SW (most common site right upper quadrant, 31%). Forty-six (18%) underwent immediate laparotomy because of evisceration (59%), hemodynamic instability (33%), or peritonitis (24%). The remaining 210 patients (82%) were taken for computed tomography scan (n = 208 [99%]) or underwent clinical observation only (n = 2 [<1%]). Of the patients undergoing computed tomography scan, 27 (13%) triggered operative intervention, and 9 (4%) triggered angioembolization. The remaining 174 patients (83%) underwent SNOM. Of these, three patients (2%) failed SNOM and underwent laparotomy: two developed peritonitis at 10 and 20 hours after arrival, respectively, and at laparotomy had small bowel and gastric injuries. The third patient developed increasing leukocytosis but had nontherapeutic laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective nonoperative management of stab wounds to the abdomen commonly avoids nontherapeutic operative intervention and its resultant complications. A small percentage of patients will fail SNOM, and therefore, close clinical observation of these patients in hospital is critical. All patients in this series who failed SNOM did so within 24 hours of presentation. Therefore, we recommend a period of 24 hours of close clinical monitoring to exclude a hollow viscus injury before discharge of patients with abdominal stab wounds who do not meet the criteria for immediate operative intervention.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":501845,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"639-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective evaluation of the selective nonoperative management of abdominal stab wounds: When is it safe to discharge?\",\"authors\":\"Natthida Owattanapanich,&nbsp;Camilla Cremonini,&nbsp;Morgan A Schellenberg,&nbsp;Kazuhide Matsushima,&nbsp;Meghan R Lewis,&nbsp;Lydia Lam,&nbsp;Matthew J Martin,&nbsp;Kenji Inaba\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000003733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal observation time required to exclude hollow viscus injury in patients undergoing selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for abdominal stab wounds (SWs) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the safe period of observation required before discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational study, all patients who sustained an abdominal SW were screened for study inclusion (July 2018 to May 2021). The primary study outcome was time to SNOM failure, defined as the need for surgical intervention after an initial period of observation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 256 consecutive patients with an abdominal SW met the study criteria. The mean age was 33 (26-46) years, and 89% were male. Of all patients, 77% had single SW, and 154 (60%) had an anterior abdominal SW (most common site right upper quadrant, 31%). Forty-six (18%) underwent immediate laparotomy because of evisceration (59%), hemodynamic instability (33%), or peritonitis (24%). The remaining 210 patients (82%) were taken for computed tomography scan (n = 208 [99%]) or underwent clinical observation only (n = 2 [<1%]). Of the patients undergoing computed tomography scan, 27 (13%) triggered operative intervention, and 9 (4%) triggered angioembolization. The remaining 174 patients (83%) underwent SNOM. Of these, three patients (2%) failed SNOM and underwent laparotomy: two developed peritonitis at 10 and 20 hours after arrival, respectively, and at laparotomy had small bowel and gastric injuries. The third patient developed increasing leukocytosis but had nontherapeutic laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selective nonoperative management of stab wounds to the abdomen commonly avoids nontherapeutic operative intervention and its resultant complications. A small percentage of patients will fail SNOM, and therefore, close clinical observation of these patients in hospital is critical. All patients in this series who failed SNOM did so within 24 hours of presentation. Therefore, we recommend a period of 24 hours of close clinical monitoring to exclude a hollow viscus injury before discharge of patients with abdominal stab wounds who do not meet the criteria for immediate operative intervention.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"639-643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对腹部刺伤(SWs)患者进行选择性非手术治疗(SNOM)以排除空心内脏损伤所需的最佳观察时间尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定出院前所需的安全观察期。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,对所有腹部SW患者进行筛选以纳入研究(2018年7月至2021年5月)。主要研究结果是SNOM失败的时间,定义为在初始观察期后需要手术干预。结果:在研究期间,连续256例腹部SW患者符合研究标准。平均年龄33岁(26-46岁),男性占89%。在所有患者中,77%为单一SW, 154例(60%)为腹前SW(最常见的部位为右上象限,31%)。46例(18%)因内脏取出(59%)、血流动力学不稳定(33%)或腹膜炎(24%)而立即开腹。其余210例(82%)患者接受了计算机断层扫描(n = 208例[99%])或仅进行了临床观察(n = 2例]。结论:选择性非手术治疗腹部刺伤通常可以避免非治疗性手术干预及其并发症。一小部分患者会出现SNOM失败,因此,在医院对这些患者进行密切的临床观察至关重要。在这个系列中,所有SNOM失败的患者都是在24小时内出现的。因此,我们建议在不符合立即手术干预标准的腹部刺伤患者出院前进行24小时的密切临床监测,以排除空心内脏损伤。证据水平:预后/流行病学;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective evaluation of the selective nonoperative management of abdominal stab wounds: When is it safe to discharge?

Background: The optimal observation time required to exclude hollow viscus injury in patients undergoing selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for abdominal stab wounds (SWs) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the safe period of observation required before discharge.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, all patients who sustained an abdominal SW were screened for study inclusion (July 2018 to May 2021). The primary study outcome was time to SNOM failure, defined as the need for surgical intervention after an initial period of observation.

Results: During the study period, 256 consecutive patients with an abdominal SW met the study criteria. The mean age was 33 (26-46) years, and 89% were male. Of all patients, 77% had single SW, and 154 (60%) had an anterior abdominal SW (most common site right upper quadrant, 31%). Forty-six (18%) underwent immediate laparotomy because of evisceration (59%), hemodynamic instability (33%), or peritonitis (24%). The remaining 210 patients (82%) were taken for computed tomography scan (n = 208 [99%]) or underwent clinical observation only (n = 2 [<1%]). Of the patients undergoing computed tomography scan, 27 (13%) triggered operative intervention, and 9 (4%) triggered angioembolization. The remaining 174 patients (83%) underwent SNOM. Of these, three patients (2%) failed SNOM and underwent laparotomy: two developed peritonitis at 10 and 20 hours after arrival, respectively, and at laparotomy had small bowel and gastric injuries. The third patient developed increasing leukocytosis but had nontherapeutic laparotomy.

Conclusion: Selective nonoperative management of stab wounds to the abdomen commonly avoids nontherapeutic operative intervention and its resultant complications. A small percentage of patients will fail SNOM, and therefore, close clinical observation of these patients in hospital is critical. All patients in this series who failed SNOM did so within 24 hours of presentation. Therefore, we recommend a period of 24 hours of close clinical monitoring to exclude a hollow viscus injury before discharge of patients with abdominal stab wounds who do not meet the criteria for immediate operative intervention.

Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信