间充质干细胞移植治疗多发性硬化症已经准备好了。

IF 5
Antonio Uccelli, Mark S Freedman
{"title":"间充质干细胞移植治疗多发性硬化症已经准备好了。","authors":"Antonio Uccelli, Mark S Freedman","doi":"10.1177/13524585221095427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mark S Freedman Department of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively studied in the last two decades with the objective to promote tissue repair in many neurological diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS). Seminal studies demonstrated that MSC can promote remyelination,1 slow axonal degeneration, and modulate pathogenic immune response against myelin antigens2 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of MS. MSC can be rather easily isolated from the bone marrow (BM) or adipose tissue and expanded in vitro with limited manipulation before intravenous (IV) or local administration in rodents but also in humans, thus providing a strong rationale for their use in MS.3 A consensus conference was held in 20104 to review all available data and concluded that it was time to prove the potential benefit of MSC by outlining the template for a proper randomized trial to examine for an in vivo biological effect of MSC to reduce inflammation and promote repair. Several small human clinical trials ensued and concluded universally that MSC administration to MS patients, regardless the route of administration, was safe and feasible and reported some effect on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics and might even reverse long-standing visual deficits.5 Despite these optimistic “hints,” the interpretation of results concerning efficacy of MSC on clinical and radiological parameters is, however, controversial:6 studies were vastly underpowered to generate consistent information on treatment effectiveness due to the limited number of patients and the heterogeneity of MS subtypes; furthermore, they were uncontrolled and unblinded, short-duration studies with limited extension of the clinical and radiological follow-up, rendering most results somewhat anecdotal, particularly for progressive MS patients. Other as yet unresolved issues make it difficult to compare results from these small studies, including the different sources for MSC isolation (e.g. BM, adipose tissue); dose https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211062173 https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211062173 Multiple Sclerosis Journal","PeriodicalId":520714,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1326-1328"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapy with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis is ready for prime time: No.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Uccelli, Mark S Freedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585221095427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mark S Freedman Department of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively studied in the last two decades with the objective to promote tissue repair in many neurological diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS). Seminal studies demonstrated that MSC can promote remyelination,1 slow axonal degeneration, and modulate pathogenic immune response against myelin antigens2 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of MS. MSC can be rather easily isolated from the bone marrow (BM) or adipose tissue and expanded in vitro with limited manipulation before intravenous (IV) or local administration in rodents but also in humans, thus providing a strong rationale for their use in MS.3 A consensus conference was held in 20104 to review all available data and concluded that it was time to prove the potential benefit of MSC by outlining the template for a proper randomized trial to examine for an in vivo biological effect of MSC to reduce inflammation and promote repair. Several small human clinical trials ensued and concluded universally that MSC administration to MS patients, regardless the route of administration, was safe and feasible and reported some effect on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics and might even reverse long-standing visual deficits.5 Despite these optimistic “hints,” the interpretation of results concerning efficacy of MSC on clinical and radiological parameters is, however, controversial:6 studies were vastly underpowered to generate consistent information on treatment effectiveness due to the limited number of patients and the heterogeneity of MS subtypes; furthermore, they were uncontrolled and unblinded, short-duration studies with limited extension of the clinical and radiological follow-up, rendering most results somewhat anecdotal, particularly for progressive MS patients. Other as yet unresolved issues make it difficult to compare results from these small studies, including the different sources for MSC isolation (e.g. BM, adipose tissue); dose https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211062173 https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211062173 Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"PeriodicalId\":520714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1326-1328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585221095427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585221095427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapy with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis is ready for prime time: No.
Mark S Freedman Department of Medicine and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) have been extensively studied in the last two decades with the objective to promote tissue repair in many neurological diseases including multiple sclerosis (MS). Seminal studies demonstrated that MSC can promote remyelination,1 slow axonal degeneration, and modulate pathogenic immune response against myelin antigens2 in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of MS. MSC can be rather easily isolated from the bone marrow (BM) or adipose tissue and expanded in vitro with limited manipulation before intravenous (IV) or local administration in rodents but also in humans, thus providing a strong rationale for their use in MS.3 A consensus conference was held in 20104 to review all available data and concluded that it was time to prove the potential benefit of MSC by outlining the template for a proper randomized trial to examine for an in vivo biological effect of MSC to reduce inflammation and promote repair. Several small human clinical trials ensued and concluded universally that MSC administration to MS patients, regardless the route of administration, was safe and feasible and reported some effect on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics and might even reverse long-standing visual deficits.5 Despite these optimistic “hints,” the interpretation of results concerning efficacy of MSC on clinical and radiological parameters is, however, controversial:6 studies were vastly underpowered to generate consistent information on treatment effectiveness due to the limited number of patients and the heterogeneity of MS subtypes; furthermore, they were uncontrolled and unblinded, short-duration studies with limited extension of the clinical and radiological follow-up, rendering most results somewhat anecdotal, particularly for progressive MS patients. Other as yet unresolved issues make it difficult to compare results from these small studies, including the different sources for MSC isolation (e.g. BM, adipose tissue); dose https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211062173 https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211062173 Multiple Sclerosis Journal
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信