TEG®6S护理点装置与TEG®5000在小儿心脏手术患者血栓弹性成像装置的比较

Q2 Health Professions
Sirisha Emani, Vishnu S Emani, Fatoumata B Diallo, Puja Dutta, Gregory S Matte, Meena Nathan, Juan C Ibla, Sitaram M Emani
{"title":"TEG®6S护理点装置与TEG®5000在小儿心脏手术患者血栓弹性成像装置的比较","authors":"Sirisha Emani,&nbsp;Vishnu S Emani,&nbsp;Fatoumata B Diallo,&nbsp;Puja Dutta,&nbsp;Gregory S Matte,&nbsp;Meena Nathan,&nbsp;Juan C Ibla,&nbsp;Sitaram M Emani","doi":"10.1182/ject-42-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thromboelastography (TEG) can predict bleeding in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that results obtained from TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 correlate with the new point-of-care TEG<sup>®</sup>6S system and that TEG<sup>®</sup>6S rewarming maximum amplitude (MA) is associated with surrogate endpoints for perioperative bleeding in pediatric patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery. We describe a retrospective study of pediatric (≤18 years) patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Citrate whole-blood samples were used to compared TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 vs.TEG<sup>®</sup>6S and TEG<sup>®</sup>6S-FLEV (with fibrinogen measurement) vs. Clauss-fibrinogen methods. TEG<sup>®</sup>6S parameters obtained during rewarming were compared to the surrogate endpoints for perioperative bleeding using linear regression analysis. Among 100 patients, 225 TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 vs.TEG<sup>®</sup>6S comparisons and 54 TEG<sup>®</sup>6S-FLEV were analyzed. Good correlation was observed for all parameters comparing TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 to TEG<sup>®</sup>6S and TEG<sup>®</sup>6S-FLEV to the Clauss-fibrinogen method (Pearson r ≥ .7). Similar to rewarming TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 MA, rewarming TEG<sup>®</sup>6S MA was the only parameter independently associated with risk for perioperative bleeding (median [interquartile range {IQR}] in bleeding vs. nonbleeding patients: 35 [29, 48] vs. 37 [32, 55]; <i>p</i> = .02). A platelet transfusion calculator was developed based on TEG<sup>®</sup>6S results by determining the relationship between platelet transfusion volume (mL/kg) and percent change in MA using linear regression analysis. TEG<sup>®</sup>6S is a good alternative point-of-care method to analyze a patient's coagulation profile and it is comparable to TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Lower TEG<sup>®</sup>6S MA during rewarming is associated with increased risk for perioperative bleeding. TEG analysis during rewarming may be useful in customizing platelet transfusion therapy by reducing the risk of bleeding while minimizing excessive blood product transfusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","volume":"54 1","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639686/pdf/ject-42-49.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Thromboelastography Devices TEG<sup>®</sup>6S Point of Care Device vs. TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Sirisha Emani,&nbsp;Vishnu S Emani,&nbsp;Fatoumata B Diallo,&nbsp;Puja Dutta,&nbsp;Gregory S Matte,&nbsp;Meena Nathan,&nbsp;Juan C Ibla,&nbsp;Sitaram M Emani\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/ject-42-49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thromboelastography (TEG) can predict bleeding in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that results obtained from TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 correlate with the new point-of-care TEG<sup>®</sup>6S system and that TEG<sup>®</sup>6S rewarming maximum amplitude (MA) is associated with surrogate endpoints for perioperative bleeding in pediatric patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery. We describe a retrospective study of pediatric (≤18 years) patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Citrate whole-blood samples were used to compared TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 vs.TEG<sup>®</sup>6S and TEG<sup>®</sup>6S-FLEV (with fibrinogen measurement) vs. Clauss-fibrinogen methods. TEG<sup>®</sup>6S parameters obtained during rewarming were compared to the surrogate endpoints for perioperative bleeding using linear regression analysis. Among 100 patients, 225 TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 vs.TEG<sup>®</sup>6S comparisons and 54 TEG<sup>®</sup>6S-FLEV were analyzed. Good correlation was observed for all parameters comparing TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 to TEG<sup>®</sup>6S and TEG<sup>®</sup>6S-FLEV to the Clauss-fibrinogen method (Pearson r ≥ .7). Similar to rewarming TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 MA, rewarming TEG<sup>®</sup>6S MA was the only parameter independently associated with risk for perioperative bleeding (median [interquartile range {IQR}] in bleeding vs. nonbleeding patients: 35 [29, 48] vs. 37 [32, 55]; <i>p</i> = .02). A platelet transfusion calculator was developed based on TEG<sup>®</sup>6S results by determining the relationship between platelet transfusion volume (mL/kg) and percent change in MA using linear regression analysis. TEG<sup>®</sup>6S is a good alternative point-of-care method to analyze a patient's coagulation profile and it is comparable to TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Lower TEG<sup>®</sup>6S MA during rewarming is associated with increased risk for perioperative bleeding. TEG analysis during rewarming may be useful in customizing platelet transfusion therapy by reducing the risk of bleeding while minimizing excessive blood product transfusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"42-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639686/pdf/ject-42-49.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/ject-42-49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/ject-42-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血栓弹性成像(TEG)可以预测儿科心脏手术患者出血。我们假设从TEG®5000获得的结果与新的护理点TEG®6S系统相关,并且TEG®6S复温最大振幅(MA)与接受复杂心脏手术的儿科患者围手术期出血的替代终点相关。我们描述了一项回顾性研究的儿童(≤18岁)患者谁接受复杂的心脏手术体外循环。柠檬酸盐全血样本用于比较TEG®5000、TEG®6S和TEG®6S- flev(含纤维蛋白原测量)与clauss -纤维蛋白原方法。采用线性回归分析,将复温期间获得的TEG®6S参数与围手术期出血的替代终点进行比较。在100例患者中,分析了225例TEG®5000与TEG®6S的比较和54例TEG®6S- flev的比较。TEG®5000与TEG®6S比较,TEG®6S- flev与clauss -纤维蛋白原法比较,所有参数均具有良好的相关性(Pearson r≥.7)。与TEG®5000 MA复温相似,TEG®6S MA复温是与围手术期出血风险独立相关的唯一参数(出血患者与非出血患者的中位数[四分位数间距{IQR}]: 35[29,48]对37 [32,55];p = .02)。通过线性回归分析血小板输注量(mL/kg)与MA变化百分比之间的关系,根据TEG®6S结果开发血小板输注计算器。TEG®6S是一种很好的替代护理点方法来分析患者的凝血状况,在接受体外循环心脏手术的儿科患者中,它与TEG®5000相当。复温期间TEG®6S MA降低与围手术期出血风险增加相关。复温期间的TEG分析可能有助于定制血小板输注治疗,降低出血风险,同时最大限度地减少过量的血液制品输注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Thromboelastography Devices TEG<sup>®</sup>6S Point of Care Device vs. TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Comparison of Thromboelastography Devices TEG<sup>®</sup>6S Point of Care Device vs. TEG<sup>®</sup>5000 in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Comparison of Thromboelastography Devices TEG®6S Point of Care Device vs. TEG®5000 in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Thromboelastography (TEG) can predict bleeding in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that results obtained from TEG®5000 correlate with the new point-of-care TEG®6S system and that TEG®6S rewarming maximum amplitude (MA) is associated with surrogate endpoints for perioperative bleeding in pediatric patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery. We describe a retrospective study of pediatric (≤18 years) patients who underwent complex cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Citrate whole-blood samples were used to compared TEG®5000 vs.TEG®6S and TEG®6S-FLEV (with fibrinogen measurement) vs. Clauss-fibrinogen methods. TEG®6S parameters obtained during rewarming were compared to the surrogate endpoints for perioperative bleeding using linear regression analysis. Among 100 patients, 225 TEG®5000 vs.TEG®6S comparisons and 54 TEG®6S-FLEV were analyzed. Good correlation was observed for all parameters comparing TEG®5000 to TEG®6S and TEG®6S-FLEV to the Clauss-fibrinogen method (Pearson r ≥ .7). Similar to rewarming TEG®5000 MA, rewarming TEG®6S MA was the only parameter independently associated with risk for perioperative bleeding (median [interquartile range {IQR}] in bleeding vs. nonbleeding patients: 35 [29, 48] vs. 37 [32, 55]; p = .02). A platelet transfusion calculator was developed based on TEG®6S results by determining the relationship between platelet transfusion volume (mL/kg) and percent change in MA using linear regression analysis. TEG®6S is a good alternative point-of-care method to analyze a patient's coagulation profile and it is comparable to TEG®5000 in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Lower TEG®6S MA during rewarming is associated with increased risk for perioperative bleeding. TEG analysis during rewarming may be useful in customizing platelet transfusion therapy by reducing the risk of bleeding while minimizing excessive blood product transfusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology
Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Extracorporeal Technology is dedicated to the study and practice of Basic Science and Clinical issues related to extracorporeal circulation. Areas emphasized in the Journal include: •Cardiopulmonary Bypass •Cardiac Surgery •Cardiovascular Anesthesia •Hematology •Blood Management •Physiology •Fluid Dynamics •Laboratory Science •Coagulation and Hematology •Transfusion •Business Practices •Pediatric Perfusion •Total Quality Management • Evidence-Based Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信