质子束治疗四肢软组织肉瘤的早期经验:一项多中心研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2022-05-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-21-00037.1
Brady S Laughlin, Michael A Golafshar, Safia Ahmed, Matthew Prince, Justin D Anderson, Tamara Vern-Gross, Mahesh Seetharam, Krista Goulding, Ivy Petersen, Todd DeWees, Jonathan B Ashman
{"title":"质子束治疗四肢软组织肉瘤的早期经验:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Brady S Laughlin,&nbsp;Michael A Golafshar,&nbsp;Safia Ahmed,&nbsp;Matthew Prince,&nbsp;Justin D Anderson,&nbsp;Tamara Vern-Gross,&nbsp;Mahesh Seetharam,&nbsp;Krista Goulding,&nbsp;Ivy Petersen,&nbsp;Todd DeWees,&nbsp;Jonathan B Ashman","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-21-00037.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an advantage when planning well-selected patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), specifically for large, anatomically challenging cases. We analyzed our early experience with PBT on toxicity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed for eSTS treated between June 2016 and October 2020 with pencil beam scanning PBT at 2 institutions. Diagnostic, treatment, and toxicity characteristics were gathered from baseline to last follow-up or death. Wound complications were defined as secondary operations for wound repair (debridement, drainage, skin graft, and muscle flap) or nonoperative management requiring hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed with R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty consecutive patients with a median age 51.5 years (range, 19-78 years) were included. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (range, 1.7-48.1 months). Tumor presentation was primary (n = 17) or recurrent after prior combined modality therapy (n = 3). Tumor location was either lower extremity (n = 16) or upper extremity (n = 4). Radiation was delivered preoperatively in most patients (n = 18). Median pretreatment tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 1.3 -30.0 cm). The 1-year locoregional control was 100%. Four patients (20%) had developed metastatic disease by end of follow-up. Maximum toxicity for acute dermatitis was grade 2 in 8 patients (40%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (15%). After preoperative radiation and surgical resection, acute wound complications occurred in 6 patients (35%). Tumor size was larger in patients with acute wound complications compared with those without (medians 16 cm, range [12-30.0 cm] vs 6.3 cm, [1.3-14.4 cm], <i>P</i> = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBT for well selected eSTS cases demonstrated excellent local control and similar acute wound complication rate comparable to historic controls. Long-term follow-up and further dosimetric analyses will provide further insight into potential advantages of PBT in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238125/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Experience Using Proton Beam Therapy for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brady S Laughlin,&nbsp;Michael A Golafshar,&nbsp;Safia Ahmed,&nbsp;Matthew Prince,&nbsp;Justin D Anderson,&nbsp;Tamara Vern-Gross,&nbsp;Mahesh Seetharam,&nbsp;Krista Goulding,&nbsp;Ivy Petersen,&nbsp;Todd DeWees,&nbsp;Jonathan B Ashman\",\"doi\":\"10.14338/IJPT-21-00037.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an advantage when planning well-selected patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), specifically for large, anatomically challenging cases. We analyzed our early experience with PBT on toxicity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was performed for eSTS treated between June 2016 and October 2020 with pencil beam scanning PBT at 2 institutions. Diagnostic, treatment, and toxicity characteristics were gathered from baseline to last follow-up or death. Wound complications were defined as secondary operations for wound repair (debridement, drainage, skin graft, and muscle flap) or nonoperative management requiring hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed with R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty consecutive patients with a median age 51.5 years (range, 19-78 years) were included. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (range, 1.7-48.1 months). Tumor presentation was primary (n = 17) or recurrent after prior combined modality therapy (n = 3). Tumor location was either lower extremity (n = 16) or upper extremity (n = 4). Radiation was delivered preoperatively in most patients (n = 18). Median pretreatment tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 1.3 -30.0 cm). The 1-year locoregional control was 100%. Four patients (20%) had developed metastatic disease by end of follow-up. Maximum toxicity for acute dermatitis was grade 2 in 8 patients (40%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (15%). After preoperative radiation and surgical resection, acute wound complications occurred in 6 patients (35%). Tumor size was larger in patients with acute wound complications compared with those without (medians 16 cm, range [12-30.0 cm] vs 6.3 cm, [1.3-14.4 cm], <i>P</i> = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PBT for well selected eSTS cases demonstrated excellent local control and similar acute wound complication rate comparable to historic controls. Long-term follow-up and further dosimetric analyses will provide further insight into potential advantages of PBT in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9238125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-21-00037.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-21-00037.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:质子束治疗(PBT)可能提供一个优势,当计划精心选择的患者肢体软组织肉瘤(eSTS),特别是大的,解剖上具有挑战性的情况下。我们分析了早期使用PBT的毒性和结果。材料和方法:回顾性研究2016年6月至2020年10月在2家机构使用铅笔束扫描PBT治疗的est。从基线到最后一次随访或死亡收集诊断、治疗和毒性特征。创面并发症定义为创面修复的二次手术(清创、引流、皮肤移植和肌肉瓣)或需要住院治疗的非手术处理。采用R软件进行统计分析。结果:共纳入20例患者,中位年龄51.5岁(范围19-78岁)。中位随访时间为13.7个月(范围1.7-48.1个月)。肿瘤表现为原发(n = 17)或先前联合治疗后复发(n = 3)。肿瘤位置为下肢(n = 16)或上肢(n = 4)。大多数患者(n = 18)术前给予放疗。中位预处理肿瘤大小为7.9 cm(范围1.3 -30.0 cm)。1年局部区域控制率为100%。4名患者(20%)在随访结束时发生转移性疾病。急性皮炎的最大毒性为8例(40%)2级,3例(15%)3级。术前放疗及手术切除后出现急性伤口并发症6例(35%)。有急性伤口并发症的患者肿瘤大小大于无急性伤口并发症的患者(中位数为16 cm,范围[12-30.0 cm] vs 6.3 cm, [1.3-14.4 cm], P = 0.003)。结论:PBT对选择良好的est病例具有良好的局部控制和相似的急性伤口并发症发生率,与历史对照组相当。长期随访和进一步的剂量学分析将进一步了解PBT在该患者群体中的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early Experience Using Proton Beam Therapy for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study.

Early Experience Using Proton Beam Therapy for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study.

Early Experience Using Proton Beam Therapy for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study.

Purpose: Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an advantage when planning well-selected patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), specifically for large, anatomically challenging cases. We analyzed our early experience with PBT on toxicity and outcomes.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed for eSTS treated between June 2016 and October 2020 with pencil beam scanning PBT at 2 institutions. Diagnostic, treatment, and toxicity characteristics were gathered from baseline to last follow-up or death. Wound complications were defined as secondary operations for wound repair (debridement, drainage, skin graft, and muscle flap) or nonoperative management requiring hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed with R software.

Results: Twenty consecutive patients with a median age 51.5 years (range, 19-78 years) were included. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (range, 1.7-48.1 months). Tumor presentation was primary (n = 17) or recurrent after prior combined modality therapy (n = 3). Tumor location was either lower extremity (n = 16) or upper extremity (n = 4). Radiation was delivered preoperatively in most patients (n = 18). Median pretreatment tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 1.3 -30.0 cm). The 1-year locoregional control was 100%. Four patients (20%) had developed metastatic disease by end of follow-up. Maximum toxicity for acute dermatitis was grade 2 in 8 patients (40%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (15%). After preoperative radiation and surgical resection, acute wound complications occurred in 6 patients (35%). Tumor size was larger in patients with acute wound complications compared with those without (medians 16 cm, range [12-30.0 cm] vs 6.3 cm, [1.3-14.4 cm], P = .003).

Conclusion: PBT for well selected eSTS cases demonstrated excellent local control and similar acute wound complication rate comparable to historic controls. Long-term follow-up and further dosimetric analyses will provide further insight into potential advantages of PBT in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信