同步动作观察和心理练习对中风后上肢运动恢复的影响

Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-29 DOI:10.1080/07380577.2022.2138675
Krystal Robinson-Bert, Anne B Woods
{"title":"同步动作观察和心理练习对中风后上肢运动恢复的影响","authors":"Krystal Robinson-Bert, Anne B Woods","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2022.2138675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group study was to examine the effect of group synchronous action observation/mental practice intervention compared to usual rehabilitation care on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 25) received usual care, consisting of a minimum of 3 hours of rehabilitation services per day, 5 days a week, plus group synchronous action observation/mental practice sessions 3 times per week and the control group (<i>n</i> = 26) received usual care. Outcome measures included the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire Short Version (KVIQ-10), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) of affected upper extremity motor function only and The Box and Block Test (BBT). Although there were no statistically significant differences in upper extremity motor function between the two groups, a subgroup analysis of the intervention group identified statistically significant (FMA-UE: <i>p</i> < .001; BBT: <i>p</i> = .04) and Minimally Important Clinical Differences on upper extremity motor recovery between patients with behaviors demonstrating more versus less commitment to the intervention. Group synchronous action observation/mental practice is a promising intervention for patients demonstrating commitment to actively participating in the intervention to improve outcomes on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"196-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of synchronous action observation and mental practice on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Krystal Robinson-Bert, Anne B Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380577.2022.2138675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group study was to examine the effect of group synchronous action observation/mental practice intervention compared to usual rehabilitation care on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 25) received usual care, consisting of a minimum of 3 hours of rehabilitation services per day, 5 days a week, plus group synchronous action observation/mental practice sessions 3 times per week and the control group (<i>n</i> = 26) received usual care. Outcome measures included the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire Short Version (KVIQ-10), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) of affected upper extremity motor function only and The Box and Block Test (BBT). Although there were no statistically significant differences in upper extremity motor function between the two groups, a subgroup analysis of the intervention group identified statistically significant (FMA-UE: <i>p</i> < .001; BBT: <i>p</i> = .04) and Minimally Important Clinical Differences on upper extremity motor recovery between patients with behaviors demonstrating more versus less commitment to the intervention. Group synchronous action observation/mental practice is a promising intervention for patients demonstrating commitment to actively participating in the intervention to improve outcomes on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"196-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2138675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2022.2138675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项准实验性的前测-后测对照组研究旨在考察小组同步行动观察/心理练习干预与常规康复护理相比对中风后上肢运动恢复的影响。干预组(n = 25)接受常规护理,包括每周 5 天、每天至少 3 小时的康复服务,以及每周 3 次的小组同步动作观察/心理练习;对照组(n = 26)接受常规护理。结果测量包括运动学和视觉意象问卷简易版(KVIQ-10)、仅对受影响上肢运动功能进行的福格尔-迈耶评估(FMA-UE)以及盒块测试(BBT)。虽然两组患者的上肢运动功能在统计学上没有显著差异,但对干预组进行的亚组分析发现,在上肢运动功能恢复方面,对干预表现出更多承诺和较少承诺的患者之间存在显著的统计学差异(FMA-UE:p < .001;BBT:p = .04)和最小重要临床差异。小组同步行动观察/心理练习是一种很有前景的干预方法,患者只要表现出积极参与干预的决心,就能改善中风后上肢运动恢复的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Effectiveness of synchronous action observation and mental practice on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke.

The purpose of this quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group study was to examine the effect of group synchronous action observation/mental practice intervention compared to usual rehabilitation care on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke. The intervention group (n = 25) received usual care, consisting of a minimum of 3 hours of rehabilitation services per day, 5 days a week, plus group synchronous action observation/mental practice sessions 3 times per week and the control group (n = 26) received usual care. Outcome measures included the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire Short Version (KVIQ-10), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) of affected upper extremity motor function only and The Box and Block Test (BBT). Although there were no statistically significant differences in upper extremity motor function between the two groups, a subgroup analysis of the intervention group identified statistically significant (FMA-UE: p < .001; BBT: p = .04) and Minimally Important Clinical Differences on upper extremity motor recovery between patients with behaviors demonstrating more versus less commitment to the intervention. Group synchronous action observation/mental practice is a promising intervention for patients demonstrating commitment to actively participating in the intervention to improve outcomes on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信