西泊莫德治疗继发性进行性多发性硬化症的真实证据。

Liesa Regner-Nelke, Marc Pawlitzki, Alice Willison, Leoni Rolfes, Sinem-Hilal Oezalp, Christopher Nelke, Tristan Kölsche, Melanie Korsen, Matthias Grothe, Sergiu Groppa, Felix Luessi, Sinah Engel, Gereon Nelles, Eckhard Bonmann, Holger Roick, Anke Friedrich, Philipp Knorn, Harald Landefeld, Zoltan Biro, Michael Ernst, Antonios Bayas, Martina Menacher, Katja Akgün, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Tobias Ruck, Tjalf Ziemssen, Refik Pul, Sven G Meuth
{"title":"西泊莫德治疗继发性进行性多发性硬化症的真实证据。","authors":"Liesa Regner-Nelke,&nbsp;Marc Pawlitzki,&nbsp;Alice Willison,&nbsp;Leoni Rolfes,&nbsp;Sinem-Hilal Oezalp,&nbsp;Christopher Nelke,&nbsp;Tristan Kölsche,&nbsp;Melanie Korsen,&nbsp;Matthias Grothe,&nbsp;Sergiu Groppa,&nbsp;Felix Luessi,&nbsp;Sinah Engel,&nbsp;Gereon Nelles,&nbsp;Eckhard Bonmann,&nbsp;Holger Roick,&nbsp;Anke Friedrich,&nbsp;Philipp Knorn,&nbsp;Harald Landefeld,&nbsp;Zoltan Biro,&nbsp;Michael Ernst,&nbsp;Antonios Bayas,&nbsp;Martina Menacher,&nbsp;Katja Akgün,&nbsp;Christoph Kleinschnitz,&nbsp;Tobias Ruck,&nbsp;Tjalf Ziemssen,&nbsp;Refik Pul,&nbsp;Sven G Meuth","doi":"10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing-remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19169,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639325/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Liesa Regner-Nelke,&nbsp;Marc Pawlitzki,&nbsp;Alice Willison,&nbsp;Leoni Rolfes,&nbsp;Sinem-Hilal Oezalp,&nbsp;Christopher Nelke,&nbsp;Tristan Kölsche,&nbsp;Melanie Korsen,&nbsp;Matthias Grothe,&nbsp;Sergiu Groppa,&nbsp;Felix Luessi,&nbsp;Sinah Engel,&nbsp;Gereon Nelles,&nbsp;Eckhard Bonmann,&nbsp;Holger Roick,&nbsp;Anke Friedrich,&nbsp;Philipp Knorn,&nbsp;Harald Landefeld,&nbsp;Zoltan Biro,&nbsp;Michael Ernst,&nbsp;Antonios Bayas,&nbsp;Martina Menacher,&nbsp;Katja Akgün,&nbsp;Christoph Kleinschnitz,&nbsp;Tobias Ruck,&nbsp;Tjalf Ziemssen,&nbsp;Refik Pul,&nbsp;Sven G Meuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing-remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639325/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:针对多发性硬化症(MS)炎症的治疗方案在复发缓解型MS中发展迅速,而针对进行性MS的治疗方法很少,特别是继发性进行性MS (SPMS)。西泊尼莫德被批准用于治疗SPMS,让原本令人沮丧的治疗前景变得乐观起来。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性、多中心、非干预性研究,分析了227例SPMS患者在现实条件下西泊莫的有效性和安全性。根据回顾性研究框架,在预先规定的时间点获取数据。每三个月评估一次临床读数。疾病进展被确定为扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)的增加、放射学进展或治疗期间新复发的发生。在安全性分析中,记录了不良事件(AE)和停药原因。收集的数据点在基线和6、12和18个月后进行分析。然而,数据主要是在6个月和12个月的时间点收集的,因为许多患者没有随访。在由41名患者组成的一组中,对疾病进展进行了更详细的调查,包括来自认知和运动功能测量的数据。结果:在西ponimod治疗下,64.8%的患者在12个月的临床疾病持续稳定。在病情稳定的患者中,21.4%的患者病情好转。在其余患者中,31.5%的患者经历了EDSS进展,3.7%的患者在未达到进展阈值的情况下恶化。复发占7.4%。治疗6个月后,24.1%的患者检测到放射学疾病活动,随访12个月时,29.6%的患者检测到放射学疾病活动。由41名患者组成的深度队列在12个月的研究期间,通过节奏听觉序列加法测试和符号数字模式测试测量的认知能力或计时25英尺步行,100米计时测试和9孔Peg测试测量的运动功能没有实质性变化。在12个月的随访中,放射学评估显示白质和灰质体积稳定,病变计数稳定。近一半的患者出现AE,以淋巴细胞减少最为常见。由于疾病进展或AE, 31.2%的患者停止治疗。结论:西泊莫德治疗在临床和放射学指标方面具有总体稳定作用。然而,需要更强化的治疗管理和监测,以确定疾病进展和AE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Background: Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing-remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions.

Results: Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy.

Conclusion: Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信