腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆结石外溢的后果:一项系统综述。

Paschalis Gavriilidis, Fausto Catena, Gianluigi de'Angelis, Nicola de'Angelis
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆结石外溢的后果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Paschalis Gavriilidis, Fausto Catena, Gianluigi de'Angelis, Nicola de'Angelis","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00456-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complications secondary to spilled gallstones can be classified in the category of disease of medical progress because prior to advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy very few reports published on the topic. The aim of the present study was to investigate the predisposing factors and the complication rate of spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the past 21 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, Pubmed, Medline, Google scholar and Cochrane library were systematically searched for pertinent literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy five out of 181 articles were selected including 85 patients; of those 38% were men and 62% women. The median age of the cohort was 64 years old and ranged between 33 and 87 years. Only 23(27%) of the authors reported the incident of spillage of the gallstones during the operation. Time of onset of symptoms varied widely from the second postoperative day to 15 years later. Ten of 85 patients were asymptomatic and diagnosed with spilled gallstones incidentally. The rest of the patients presented with complications of severe morbidity and almost, 87% of the patients needed to be treated with surgical intervention and 12% with US ± CT scan guidance drainage. Only one perioperative death reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Symptomatic patients with lost gallstones present with severe morbidity complications and required mostly major surgical procedures. Therefore, standardisation of the management of spilled gallstones is needed urgently. Hospitals need to review their policy with audits and recommendations and clinical guidelines are needed urgently.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of the spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Paschalis Gavriilidis, Fausto Catena, Gianluigi de'Angelis, Nicola de'Angelis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13017-022-00456-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complications secondary to spilled gallstones can be classified in the category of disease of medical progress because prior to advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy very few reports published on the topic. The aim of the present study was to investigate the predisposing factors and the complication rate of spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the past 21 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, Pubmed, Medline, Google scholar and Cochrane library were systematically searched for pertinent literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy five out of 181 articles were selected including 85 patients; of those 38% were men and 62% women. The median age of the cohort was 64 years old and ranged between 33 and 87 years. Only 23(27%) of the authors reported the incident of spillage of the gallstones during the operation. Time of onset of symptoms varied widely from the second postoperative day to 15 years later. Ten of 85 patients were asymptomatic and diagnosed with spilled gallstones incidentally. The rest of the patients presented with complications of severe morbidity and almost, 87% of the patients needed to be treated with surgical intervention and 12% with US ± CT scan guidance drainage. Only one perioperative death reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Symptomatic patients with lost gallstones present with severe morbidity complications and required mostly major surgical procedures. Therefore, standardisation of the management of spilled gallstones is needed urgently. Hospitals need to review their policy with audits and recommendations and clinical guidelines are needed urgently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":290899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00456-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00456-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:胆囊结石外溢的并发症可归入医学进展疾病的范畴,因为在腹腔镜胆囊切除术出现之前,很少有关于该主题的报道。本研究旨在探讨21年来腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆囊结石外溢的易感因素及并发症发生率。方法:系统检索Embase、Pubmed、Medline、谷歌scholar和Cochrane library的相关文献。结果:181篇文章入选75篇,其中85例患者入选;其中38%是男性,62%是女性。该队列的中位年龄为64岁,年龄范围在33岁至87岁之间。只有23位(27%)的作者报告了手术中胆结石溢出的事件。从术后第二天到15年后,出现症状的时间差异很大。85例患者中有10例无症状,偶然诊断为胆结石外溢。其余患者出现严重并发症,87%的患者需要手术治疗,12%的患者需要US±CT扫描引导引流。只有一例围手术期死亡报告。结论:有症状的胆结石丢失患者存在严重的并发症,大多数需要大手术治疗。因此,迫切需要规范外溢胆结石的管理。医院需要通过审计和建议审查其政策,迫切需要临床指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Consequences of the spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Consequences of the spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

Introduction: Complications secondary to spilled gallstones can be classified in the category of disease of medical progress because prior to advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy very few reports published on the topic. The aim of the present study was to investigate the predisposing factors and the complication rate of spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the past 21 years.

Methods: Embase, Pubmed, Medline, Google scholar and Cochrane library were systematically searched for pertinent literature.

Results: Seventy five out of 181 articles were selected including 85 patients; of those 38% were men and 62% women. The median age of the cohort was 64 years old and ranged between 33 and 87 years. Only 23(27%) of the authors reported the incident of spillage of the gallstones during the operation. Time of onset of symptoms varied widely from the second postoperative day to 15 years later. Ten of 85 patients were asymptomatic and diagnosed with spilled gallstones incidentally. The rest of the patients presented with complications of severe morbidity and almost, 87% of the patients needed to be treated with surgical intervention and 12% with US ± CT scan guidance drainage. Only one perioperative death reported.

Conclusions: Symptomatic patients with lost gallstones present with severe morbidity complications and required mostly major surgical procedures. Therefore, standardisation of the management of spilled gallstones is needed urgently. Hospitals need to review their policy with audits and recommendations and clinical guidelines are needed urgently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信