基于电子病历的戒烟治疗遗漏了哪些人?吸烟和不定期到初级保健诊所就诊的患者的描述性研究。

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-03 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2020.21
Margaret Nolan, Deejay Zwaga, Danielle McCarthy, Christian Kastman, Timothy Baker, Mark Zehner, Stevens Smith, Michael Fiore
{"title":"基于电子病历的戒烟治疗遗漏了哪些人?吸烟和不定期到初级保健诊所就诊的患者的描述性研究。","authors":"Margaret Nolan,&nbsp;Deejay Zwaga,&nbsp;Danielle McCarthy,&nbsp;Christian Kastman,&nbsp;Timothy Baker,&nbsp;Mark Zehner,&nbsp;Stevens Smith,&nbsp;Michael Fiore","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2020.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) \"cold-called\" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"15 4","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2020.21","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Nolan,&nbsp;Deejay Zwaga,&nbsp;Danielle McCarthy,&nbsp;Christian Kastman,&nbsp;Timothy Baker,&nbsp;Mark Zehner,&nbsp;Stevens Smith,&nbsp;Michael Fiore\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jsc.2020.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) \\\"cold-called\\\" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"175-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2020.21\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2020.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2020.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数烟草治疗工作的目标是医疗保健机构,因为在美国,每年约有75%的吸烟者去初级保健提供者那里。然而,25%的患者可能会被这种靶向治疗遗漏。目的:描述吸烟但不经常访问初级保健的患者——他们的特征、电话联系成功率和接受烟草治疗的程度。方法:戒烟外展专家(TCOS)在过去的一年里,那些没有去初级保健诊所就诊的人被“推销”,提供烟草依赖治疗。报告了年龄、性别、保险状况、种族、民族、EHR患者门户状态和推广结果。结果:在卫生系统登记的3407例吸烟者中,565例(16.6%)在过去一年中没有见过任何初级保健提供者。在271个电话中,有143个(53%)成功接通,33个(23%)设定了戒烟日期。那些没有去看医生的人往往是更年轻的男性,他们每天吸烟,而不是每天吸烟(42岁对44岁)。, p = 0.004;48% vs. 40%女性,p=0.0002, 21% vs. 27%某天,p=0.003),并且在EHR患者门户较少活跃(33% vs. 40%, p= 0.001)。结论:相当大比例的吸烟患者被传统的烟草治疗干预措施遗漏,需要初级保健访问,但许多人接受戒烟治疗提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who are we missing with EHR-Based Smoking Cessation Treatments? A Descriptive Study of Patients who Smoke and Do Not Regularly Visit Primary Care Clinics.

Introduction: Most tobacco treatment efforts target healthcare settings, since about 75% of smokers in the United States visit a primary care provider annually. Yet, 25% of patients may be missed by such targeting.

Aims: To describe patients who smoke but infrequently visit primary care -- their characteristics, rates of successful telephone contact, and acceptance of tobacco treatment.

Methods: Tobacco Cessation Outreach Specialists (TCOS) "cold-called" those without a primary care visit in the past year, offering tobacco dependence treatment. Age, sex, insurance status, race, ethnicity, EHR patient-portal status and outreach outcomes were reported.

Results: Of 3,407 patients identified as smokers in a health system registry, 565 (16.6%) had not seen any primary care provider in the past year. Among 271 of those called, 143 (53%) were successfully reached and 33 (23%) set a quit date. Those without visits tended to be younger, male, some-day versus every-day smokers (42 vs. 44 yrs., p = 0.004; 48% vs. 40% female, p=0.0002, and 21% vs. 27% some-day, p=0.003), and less active on the EHR patient portal (33% vs. 40%, p =0.001).

Conclusions: A substantial proportion of patients who smoke are missed by traditional tobacco treatment interventions that require a primary care visit, yet many are receptive to quit smoking treatment offers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信