整体反应性抗体对肾移植后T细胞免疫恢复的影响。

Lampros Vagiotas, Maria Stangou, Efstratios Kasimatis, Aliki Xochelli, Grigorios Myserlis, Georgios Lioulios, Vasiliki Nikolaidou, Manolis Panteli, Konstantinos Ouranos, Nikolaos Antoniadis, Daoudaki Maria, Aikaterini Papagianni, Georgios Tsoulfas, Asimina Fylaktou
{"title":"整体反应性抗体对肾移植后T细胞免疫恢复的影响。","authors":"Lampros Vagiotas,&nbsp;Maria Stangou,&nbsp;Efstratios Kasimatis,&nbsp;Aliki Xochelli,&nbsp;Grigorios Myserlis,&nbsp;Georgios Lioulios,&nbsp;Vasiliki Nikolaidou,&nbsp;Manolis Panteli,&nbsp;Konstantinos Ouranos,&nbsp;Nikolaos Antoniadis,&nbsp;Daoudaki Maria,&nbsp;Aikaterini Papagianni,&nbsp;Georgios Tsoulfas,&nbsp;Asimina Fylaktou","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease is associated with immunological disorders, presented as phenotypic alterations of T lymphocytes. These changes are expected to be restored after a successful renal transplantation; however, additional parameters may contribute to this process.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of positive panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) on the restoration of T cell phenotype, after renal transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CD4CD28null, CD8CD28null, natural killer cells (NKs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were estimated by flow cytometry at T0, T3, and T6 which were the time of transplantation, and 3- and 6-mo follow-up, respectively. Changes were esti mated regarding the presence or absence of PRAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were classified in two groups: PRA(-) (<i>n</i> = 43) and PRA(+) (<i>n</i> = 28) groups. Lymphocyte and their subtypes were similar between the two groups at T0, whereas their percentage was increased at T3 in PRA(-) compared to PRA(+) [23 (10.9-47.9) <i>vs</i> 16.4 (7.5-36.8 μ/L, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.03]. Lymphocyte changes in PRA(-) patients included a significant increase in CD4 cells (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), CD8 cells (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and Tregs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and a reduction of NKs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). PRA(+) patients showed an increase in CD4 (<i>P</i> = 0.008) and CD8 (<i>P</i> = 0.0001), and a reduction in NKs (<i>P</i> = 0.07). CD4CD28null and CD8CD28null cells, although initially reduced in both groups, were stabilized thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study described important differences in the immune response between PRA(+) and PRA(-) patients with changes in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subpopulations. PRA(+) patients seemed to have a worse immune profile after 6 mo follow-up, regardless of renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":68893,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","volume":"12 10","pages":"313-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/69/WJT-12-313.PMC9614585.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Lampros Vagiotas,&nbsp;Maria Stangou,&nbsp;Efstratios Kasimatis,&nbsp;Aliki Xochelli,&nbsp;Grigorios Myserlis,&nbsp;Georgios Lioulios,&nbsp;Vasiliki Nikolaidou,&nbsp;Manolis Panteli,&nbsp;Konstantinos Ouranos,&nbsp;Nikolaos Antoniadis,&nbsp;Daoudaki Maria,&nbsp;Aikaterini Papagianni,&nbsp;Georgios Tsoulfas,&nbsp;Asimina Fylaktou\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease is associated with immunological disorders, presented as phenotypic alterations of T lymphocytes. These changes are expected to be restored after a successful renal transplantation; however, additional parameters may contribute to this process.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of positive panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) on the restoration of T cell phenotype, after renal transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CD4CD28null, CD8CD28null, natural killer cells (NKs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were estimated by flow cytometry at T0, T3, and T6 which were the time of transplantation, and 3- and 6-mo follow-up, respectively. Changes were esti mated regarding the presence or absence of PRAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were classified in two groups: PRA(-) (<i>n</i> = 43) and PRA(+) (<i>n</i> = 28) groups. Lymphocyte and their subtypes were similar between the two groups at T0, whereas their percentage was increased at T3 in PRA(-) compared to PRA(+) [23 (10.9-47.9) <i>vs</i> 16.4 (7.5-36.8 μ/L, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.03]. Lymphocyte changes in PRA(-) patients included a significant increase in CD4 cells (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), CD8 cells (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and Tregs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and a reduction of NKs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). PRA(+) patients showed an increase in CD4 (<i>P</i> = 0.008) and CD8 (<i>P</i> = 0.0001), and a reduction in NKs (<i>P</i> = 0.07). CD4CD28null and CD8CD28null cells, although initially reduced in both groups, were stabilized thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study described important differences in the immune response between PRA(+) and PRA(-) patients with changes in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subpopulations. PRA(+) patients seemed to have a worse immune profile after 6 mo follow-up, regardless of renal function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":68893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界移植杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"313-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/69/WJT-12-313.PMC9614585.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界移植杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:慢性肾脏疾病与免疫紊乱有关,表现为T淋巴细胞的表型改变。这些变化有望在肾移植成功后恢复;然而,其他参数可能有助于这一过程。目的:探讨阳性反应性抗体(positive panel reactive antibodies, PRAs)对肾移植后T细胞表型恢复的影响。方法:采用流式细胞术分别在移植时间T0、T3、T6及随访3、6个月时检测CD4CD28null、CD8CD28null、自然杀伤细胞(NKs)和调节性T细胞(Tregs)。评估了关于pra存在与否的变化。结果:患者分为两组:PRA(-)组(n = 43)和PRA(+)组(n = 28)。两组在T0时淋巴细胞及其亚型基本相同,而在T3时PRA(-)的淋巴细胞及其亚型百分比分别高于PRA(+)[23(10.9-47.9)和16.4 (7.5-36.8)μ/L];P = 0.03]。PRA(-)患者淋巴细胞变化包括CD4细胞(P < 0.0001)、CD8细胞(P < 0.0001)和Tregs细胞(P < 0.0001)显著升高,NKs细胞减少(P < 0.0001)。PRA(+)患者CD4 (P = 0.008)和CD8 (P = 0.0001)升高,NKs降低(P = 0.07)。CD4CD28null和CD8CD28null细胞虽然在两组中最初减少,但此后稳定。结论:我们的研究描述了PRA(+)和PRA(-)患者在淋巴细胞和淋巴细胞亚群变化方面的免疫应答的重要差异。无论肾功能如何,PRA(+)患者在随访6个月后似乎有更差的免疫状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.

Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.

Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.

Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.

Background: Chronic kidney disease is associated with immunological disorders, presented as phenotypic alterations of T lymphocytes. These changes are expected to be restored after a successful renal transplantation; however, additional parameters may contribute to this process.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of positive panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) on the restoration of T cell phenotype, after renal transplantation.

Methods: CD4CD28null, CD8CD28null, natural killer cells (NKs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were estimated by flow cytometry at T0, T3, and T6 which were the time of transplantation, and 3- and 6-mo follow-up, respectively. Changes were esti mated regarding the presence or absence of PRAs.

Results: Patients were classified in two groups: PRA(-) (n = 43) and PRA(+) (n = 28) groups. Lymphocyte and their subtypes were similar between the two groups at T0, whereas their percentage was increased at T3 in PRA(-) compared to PRA(+) [23 (10.9-47.9) vs 16.4 (7.5-36.8 μ/L, respectively; P = 0.03]. Lymphocyte changes in PRA(-) patients included a significant increase in CD4 cells (P < 0.0001), CD8 cells (P < 0.0001), and Tregs (P < 0.0001), and a reduction of NKs (P < 0.0001). PRA(+) patients showed an increase in CD4 (P = 0.008) and CD8 (P = 0.0001), and a reduction in NKs (P = 0.07). CD4CD28null and CD8CD28null cells, although initially reduced in both groups, were stabilized thereafter.

Conclusion: Our study described important differences in the immune response between PRA(+) and PRA(-) patients with changes in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subpopulations. PRA(+) patients seemed to have a worse immune profile after 6 mo follow-up, regardless of renal function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
364
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信