恶性盆腔肿瘤1型盆腔切除重建椎弓根钉棒系统不植骨的疗效:一个病例系列和近期回顾。

Vivek Ajit Singh, Nor Faissal Yasin, Azura Mansor, Ahmed Elsiddig Mohamed Elhadi, Mohd Ariff Sharifudin
{"title":"恶性盆腔肿瘤1型盆腔切除重建椎弓根钉棒系统不植骨的疗效:一个病例系列和近期回顾。","authors":"Vivek Ajit Singh,&nbsp;Nor Faissal Yasin,&nbsp;Azura Mansor,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsiddig Mohamed Elhadi,&nbsp;Mohd Ariff Sharifudin","doi":"10.1177/10225536221119510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the reconstruction method for type 1 resections around the pelvis. Various methods are currently used, such as resection without reconstruction, bone graft (autologous, recycled, allograft) with simple fixation, and pedicle screw-rod fixation with or without bone grafting. We aim to study the outcome of pedicle screw-rod reconstruction without bone grafting in type 1 pelvic resections involving sacroiliac joint to show that pedicle screw-rod construct alone is stable and has low risk of failure.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of eight patients who underwent type 1 resection of malignant pelvic tumours and reconstruction with a pedicle screw-rod system between 2011 and 2018. All patients who underwent type 1 resection and reconstruction with pedicle screw without bone grafting were included into this study. We reported their clinical (complication and radiological outcome), oncological (local recurrence and metastasis), and functional outcome based on Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at their last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients were recruited into the study. The mean follow-up period was 58.5 months (range: 40 - 121 months). There were three postoperative complications in three different patients: superficial infection, surgical hernia with ipsilateral femoral avascular necrosis (AVN), and femoral nerve injury. At the end of the study period, one patient passed away due to disease progression, one patient was alive with disease, and the rest were disease-free. Mean MSTS score during last follow-up was 77.1% (range: 66.7% - 93.3%), while mean TESS score was 75.6% range (63.3% - 80.2%). There were no cases of implant failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Type 1 pelvic reconstruction with a pedicle screw-rod system is stable without a concurrent biological reconstruction, and it is feasible, with few complications, and an excellent functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":520682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","volume":" ","pages":"10225536221119510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The outcome of type 1 pelvic resection and reconstruction with pedicle screw-rod system without bone grafting in malignant pelvic tumour: A case series and short term review.\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Ajit Singh,&nbsp;Nor Faissal Yasin,&nbsp;Azura Mansor,&nbsp;Ahmed Elsiddig Mohamed Elhadi,&nbsp;Mohd Ariff Sharifudin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536221119510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the reconstruction method for type 1 resections around the pelvis. Various methods are currently used, such as resection without reconstruction, bone graft (autologous, recycled, allograft) with simple fixation, and pedicle screw-rod fixation with or without bone grafting. We aim to study the outcome of pedicle screw-rod reconstruction without bone grafting in type 1 pelvic resections involving sacroiliac joint to show that pedicle screw-rod construct alone is stable and has low risk of failure.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of eight patients who underwent type 1 resection of malignant pelvic tumours and reconstruction with a pedicle screw-rod system between 2011 and 2018. All patients who underwent type 1 resection and reconstruction with pedicle screw without bone grafting were included into this study. We reported their clinical (complication and radiological outcome), oncological (local recurrence and metastasis), and functional outcome based on Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at their last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients were recruited into the study. The mean follow-up period was 58.5 months (range: 40 - 121 months). There were three postoperative complications in three different patients: superficial infection, surgical hernia with ipsilateral femoral avascular necrosis (AVN), and femoral nerve injury. At the end of the study period, one patient passed away due to disease progression, one patient was alive with disease, and the rest were disease-free. Mean MSTS score during last follow-up was 77.1% (range: 66.7% - 93.3%), while mean TESS score was 75.6% range (63.3% - 80.2%). There were no cases of implant failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Type 1 pelvic reconstruction with a pedicle screw-rod system is stable without a concurrent biological reconstruction, and it is feasible, with few complications, and an excellent functional outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10225536221119510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221119510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221119510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于骨盆周围1型切除术的重建方法尚无共识。目前使用的方法多种多样,如切除不重建、骨移植(自体、再生、同种异体移植)简单固定、椎弓根螺钉-棒固定或不植骨。我们的目的是研究不植骨的椎弓根螺钉棒重建在涉及骶髂关节的1型盆腔切除术中的结果,表明单独的椎弓根螺钉棒重建是稳定的,并且失败的风险低。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了2011年至2018年期间接受1型恶性盆腔肿瘤切除术和椎弓根螺钉-棒系统重建的8例患者。所有采用1型切除重建椎弓根螺钉不植骨的患者纳入本研究。我们报告了他们的临床(并发症和放射学结果)、肿瘤学(局部复发和转移)和基于肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会评分(MSTS)和多伦多肢体挽救评分(TESS)的功能结果。结果:8例患者被纳入研究。平均随访时间为58.5个月(40 ~ 121个月)。3例患者术后出现3种并发症:浅表感染、手术疝合并同侧股血管坏死(AVN)和股神经损伤。在研究期结束时,一名患者因疾病进展而死亡,一名患者带着疾病存活,其余患者无疾病。末次随访时MSTS平均评分77.1%(范围:66.7% ~ 93.3%),TESS平均评分75.6%(范围:63.3% ~ 80.2%)。无种植体失败病例。结论:1型盆腔重建椎弓根钉棒系统稳定,无需同时进行生物重建,是可行的,并发症少,功能预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The outcome of type 1 pelvic resection and reconstruction with pedicle screw-rod system without bone grafting in malignant pelvic tumour: A case series and short term review.

Introduction: There is no consensus regarding the reconstruction method for type 1 resections around the pelvis. Various methods are currently used, such as resection without reconstruction, bone graft (autologous, recycled, allograft) with simple fixation, and pedicle screw-rod fixation with or without bone grafting. We aim to study the outcome of pedicle screw-rod reconstruction without bone grafting in type 1 pelvic resections involving sacroiliac joint to show that pedicle screw-rod construct alone is stable and has low risk of failure.

Material and methods: This is a retrospective review of eight patients who underwent type 1 resection of malignant pelvic tumours and reconstruction with a pedicle screw-rod system between 2011 and 2018. All patients who underwent type 1 resection and reconstruction with pedicle screw without bone grafting were included into this study. We reported their clinical (complication and radiological outcome), oncological (local recurrence and metastasis), and functional outcome based on Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at their last follow-up.

Results: Eight patients were recruited into the study. The mean follow-up period was 58.5 months (range: 40 - 121 months). There were three postoperative complications in three different patients: superficial infection, surgical hernia with ipsilateral femoral avascular necrosis (AVN), and femoral nerve injury. At the end of the study period, one patient passed away due to disease progression, one patient was alive with disease, and the rest were disease-free. Mean MSTS score during last follow-up was 77.1% (range: 66.7% - 93.3%), while mean TESS score was 75.6% range (63.3% - 80.2%). There were no cases of implant failure.

Conclusion: Type 1 pelvic reconstruction with a pedicle screw-rod system is stable without a concurrent biological reconstruction, and it is feasible, with few complications, and an excellent functional outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信