加拿大安大略省用于治疗丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物的处方趋势。

Canadian liver journal Pub Date : 2021-02-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3138/canlivj-2020-0025
Mina Tadrous, Kate Mason, Zoë Dodd, Mary Guyton, Jeff Powis, Daniel McCormack, Tara Gomes
{"title":"加拿大安大略省用于治疗丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物的处方趋势。","authors":"Mina Tadrous, Kate Mason, Zoë Dodd, Mary Guyton, Jeff Powis, Daniel McCormack, Tara Gomes","doi":"10.3138/canlivj-2020-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) offer an opportunity to cure hepatitis C. Reimbursement for DAAs has changed on two occasions since their inclusion on the Ontario public formulary. Whether these changes have appreciably modified prescribing patterns and increased access to DAAs is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of DAA reimbursement by the Ontario Public Drug Programs from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018, to summarize the use of DAAs in Ontario and describe changes in DAA prescribing physician specialties over this period. We measured the total number of users quarterly. Results are reported overall and by prescriber type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,116 individuals received a publicly funded prescription for a DAA from the first quarter (Q1) of 2012 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2018. Nearly two-thirds (<i>n</i> = 17,813; 65.7%) of all DAAs were prescribed by gastroenterologists, hepatologists, or infectious disease specialists. Use of DAAs over time appears to have had three major phases in uptake: (1) the introduction of DAA treatments on the Ontario public drug formulary as a prior authorization benefit in Q1 2015, (2) expanded listing of all DAAs as limited-use products on the formulary in Q1 2017, and (3) the introduction of newer DAAs in Q2 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in listing of these agents had a direct impact on the use of DAAs overall. Generally, broader listing expanded access but did not appear to shift utilization patterns to primary care prescribers. Further understanding of who is not receiving treatment is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9527,"journal":{"name":"Canadian liver journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203166/pdf/canlivj-2020-0025.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing trends in direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C in Ontario, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Mina Tadrous, Kate Mason, Zoë Dodd, Mary Guyton, Jeff Powis, Daniel McCormack, Tara Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/canlivj-2020-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) offer an opportunity to cure hepatitis C. Reimbursement for DAAs has changed on two occasions since their inclusion on the Ontario public formulary. Whether these changes have appreciably modified prescribing patterns and increased access to DAAs is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of DAA reimbursement by the Ontario Public Drug Programs from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018, to summarize the use of DAAs in Ontario and describe changes in DAA prescribing physician specialties over this period. We measured the total number of users quarterly. Results are reported overall and by prescriber type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27,116 individuals received a publicly funded prescription for a DAA from the first quarter (Q1) of 2012 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2018. Nearly two-thirds (<i>n</i> = 17,813; 65.7%) of all DAAs were prescribed by gastroenterologists, hepatologists, or infectious disease specialists. Use of DAAs over time appears to have had three major phases in uptake: (1) the introduction of DAA treatments on the Ontario public drug formulary as a prior authorization benefit in Q1 2015, (2) expanded listing of all DAAs as limited-use products on the formulary in Q1 2017, and (3) the introduction of newer DAAs in Q2 2018.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in listing of these agents had a direct impact on the use of DAAs overall. Generally, broader listing expanded access but did not appear to shift utilization patterns to primary care prescribers. Further understanding of who is not receiving treatment is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian liver journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9203166/pdf/canlivj-2020-0025.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian liver journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2020-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian liver journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2020-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)提供了治愈丙型肝炎的机会。自列入安大略省公共处方集以来,DAAs 的报销已发生了两次变化。这些变化是否显著改变了处方模式并增加了DAAs的使用机会尚不得而知:我们对 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间安大略省公共药物计划的 DAA 报销情况进行了重复横断面研究,总结了安大略省 DAA 的使用情况,并描述了在此期间 DAA 处方医生专业的变化。我们每季度测量一次用户总数。报告了总体结果和按处方者类型分列的结果:从 2012 年第一季度(Q1)到 2018 年第四季度(Q4),共有 27116 人获得了由政府资助的 DAA 处方。近三分之二(n = 17,813; 65.7%)的DAAs处方由消化科医生、肝病医生或传染病专家开具。随着时间的推移,DAAs的使用似乎经历了三个主要阶段:(1)2015年第一季度,DAAs治疗作为一种事先授权福利被纳入安大略省公共药品目录;(2)2017年第一季度,所有DAAs作为有限使用产品被扩大列入药品目录;(3)2018年第二季度,引入了较新的DAAs:这些药物列表的变化对 DAAs 的总体使用情况产生了直接影响。一般来说,更广泛的列表扩大了使用范围,但似乎并未将使用模式转移到初级保健处方者身上。需要进一步了解哪些人没有接受治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescribing trends in direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C in Ontario, Canada.

Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) offer an opportunity to cure hepatitis C. Reimbursement for DAAs has changed on two occasions since their inclusion on the Ontario public formulary. Whether these changes have appreciably modified prescribing patterns and increased access to DAAs is unknown.

Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of DAA reimbursement by the Ontario Public Drug Programs from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018, to summarize the use of DAAs in Ontario and describe changes in DAA prescribing physician specialties over this period. We measured the total number of users quarterly. Results are reported overall and by prescriber type.

Results: A total of 27,116 individuals received a publicly funded prescription for a DAA from the first quarter (Q1) of 2012 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2018. Nearly two-thirds (n = 17,813; 65.7%) of all DAAs were prescribed by gastroenterologists, hepatologists, or infectious disease specialists. Use of DAAs over time appears to have had three major phases in uptake: (1) the introduction of DAA treatments on the Ontario public drug formulary as a prior authorization benefit in Q1 2015, (2) expanded listing of all DAAs as limited-use products on the formulary in Q1 2017, and (3) the introduction of newer DAAs in Q2 2018.

Conclusions: Changes in listing of these agents had a direct impact on the use of DAAs overall. Generally, broader listing expanded access but did not appear to shift utilization patterns to primary care prescribers. Further understanding of who is not receiving treatment is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信