关节活动与针灸对慢性颈部疼痛患者疼痛和功能能力的影响:一项比较疗效的随机对照试验。

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Petros Voulgarakis, Paris Iakovidis, Dimitrios Lytras, Ioanna P Chatziprodromidou, Anastasios Kottaras, Thomas Apostolou
{"title":"关节活动与针灸对慢性颈部疼痛患者疼痛和功能能力的影响:一项比较疗效的随机对照试验。","authors":"Petros Voulgarakis,&nbsp;Paris Iakovidis,&nbsp;Dimitrios Lytras,&nbsp;Ioanna P Chatziprodromidou,&nbsp;Anastasios Kottaras,&nbsp;Thomas Apostolou","doi":"10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.6.231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Neck Pain (CNP) is one of the main contributing factors to disability in people of working age.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the efficacy between acupuncture and joint mobilization on pain and disability in patients with CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 45 men and women with CNP, divided into three groups of 15 each. The first group followed a manual therapy protocol with joint mobilization for eight weeks three times per week. The second group followed an acupuncture protocol of equal duration and frequency, while the third group did not follow any treatment. Pain with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and functional limitations with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire were assessed before and after an 8-week intervention. Analysis of variance was applied while post-hoc comparisons were made to determine the differences among the groups at each time of measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both intervention groups showed statistically significant differences compared to the control group after the end of the intervention in both the VAS and the NDI scores (<i>p</i>< .001). Furthermore, the acupuncture group showed a statistically significant improvement compared to the joint mobilization team after the end of the intervention in the VAS score (<i>p</i>< .001) and the NDI score (<i>p</i>< .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both joint mobilization and acupuncture appear to be effective interventions in reducing pain and improving functional ability in people with CNP. However, acupuncture appears to have a greater analgesic effect than joint mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":46854,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Joint Mobilization Versus Acupuncture on Pain and Functional Ability in People with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparative Effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Petros Voulgarakis,&nbsp;Paris Iakovidis,&nbsp;Dimitrios Lytras,&nbsp;Ioanna P Chatziprodromidou,&nbsp;Anastasios Kottaras,&nbsp;Thomas Apostolou\",\"doi\":\"10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.6.231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Neck Pain (CNP) is one of the main contributing factors to disability in people of working age.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the efficacy between acupuncture and joint mobilization on pain and disability in patients with CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 45 men and women with CNP, divided into three groups of 15 each. The first group followed a manual therapy protocol with joint mobilization for eight weeks three times per week. The second group followed an acupuncture protocol of equal duration and frequency, while the third group did not follow any treatment. Pain with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and functional limitations with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire were assessed before and after an 8-week intervention. Analysis of variance was applied while post-hoc comparisons were made to determine the differences among the groups at each time of measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both intervention groups showed statistically significant differences compared to the control group after the end of the intervention in both the VAS and the NDI scores (<i>p</i>< .001). Furthermore, the acupuncture group showed a statistically significant improvement compared to the joint mobilization team after the end of the intervention in the VAS score (<i>p</i>< .001) and the NDI score (<i>p</i>< .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both joint mobilization and acupuncture appear to be effective interventions in reducing pain and improving functional ability in people with CNP. However, acupuncture appears to have a greater analgesic effect than joint mobilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.6.231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.6.231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)是导致工作年龄人群残疾的主要因素之一。目的:这项随机临床试验的目的是比较针灸和关节活动对CNP患者疼痛和残疾的疗效。方法:将45名患有CNP的男性和女性分为三组,每组15人。第一组遵循关节活动的手动治疗方案,每周三次,持续八周。第二组遵循相同时间和频率的针灸方案,而第三组没有遵循任何治疗。在干预8周之前和之后用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛和颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷的功能限制。采用方差分析,并进行事后比较,以确定各组在每次测量时的差异。结果:干预结束后,两组患者的VAS评分和NDI评分均与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(p< 0.001)。此外,针刺组干预结束后VAS评分(p< 0.001)和NDI评分(p< 0.05)较关节活动组有统计学意义的改善。结论:关节活动和针灸是减轻CNP患者疼痛和改善功能能力的有效干预措施。然而,针灸似乎比关节活动有更大的镇痛作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Joint Mobilization Versus Acupuncture on Pain and Functional Ability in People with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparative Effectiveness.

Background: Chronic Neck Pain (CNP) is one of the main contributing factors to disability in people of working age.

Objectives: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the efficacy between acupuncture and joint mobilization on pain and disability in patients with CNP.

Methods: The study involved 45 men and women with CNP, divided into three groups of 15 each. The first group followed a manual therapy protocol with joint mobilization for eight weeks three times per week. The second group followed an acupuncture protocol of equal duration and frequency, while the third group did not follow any treatment. Pain with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and functional limitations with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire were assessed before and after an 8-week intervention. Analysis of variance was applied while post-hoc comparisons were made to determine the differences among the groups at each time of measurement.

Results: Both intervention groups showed statistically significant differences compared to the control group after the end of the intervention in both the VAS and the NDI scores (p< .001). Furthermore, the acupuncture group showed a statistically significant improvement compared to the joint mobilization team after the end of the intervention in the VAS score (p< .001) and the NDI score (p< .05).

Conclusion: Both joint mobilization and acupuncture appear to be effective interventions in reducing pain and improving functional ability in people with CNP. However, acupuncture appears to have a greater analgesic effect than joint mobilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine. Manuscripts should fall into one of the categories: topical review, original research paper, brief ... click here for full Aims & Scope The Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies related to basic and clinical acupuncture and meridian research. It also includes new paradigm of integrative research, covering East–West and traditional–modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信