干眼病动物模型泪腺摘除对对侧眼的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-15 DOI:10.3341/kjo.2022.0012
Minha Kim, So Young Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Hyung Keun Lee
{"title":"干眼病动物模型泪腺摘除对对侧眼的影响。","authors":"Minha Kim,&nbsp;So Young Kim,&nbsp;Ji Won Jeon,&nbsp;Hyung Keun Lee","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although there is still no consensus on the best animal model for dry eye disease research, a model based on lacrimal gland extraction (LGE) model is widely used. In this study, we aimed to investigate the histopathological changes taking place on the contralateral eye after unilateral LGE to determine whether it is useful as a control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were divided into naive control, environmental chamber model, and LGE groups. Corneal fluorescein staining was scored to quantify the severity of damage. Morphological changes in the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland (LG) were determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining and compared to those on naive control animals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to naive subjects, the unilateral LGE model showed enhanced corneal erosion scores and loss of conjunctival goblet cells, not only on the ipsilateral but also on the contralateral side. These changes in the ocular surface became more pronounced in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, loss of LG acinar cells and leukocyte infiltration were detected in the contralateral LGs of the LGE model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the changes observed in the ocular surface and LGs, the contralateral side of the LGE model may not offer proper control conditions for the experimental comparison of the effects of dry eye disease in vivo. There may be regulatory feedback or crosstalk system between both eyes activated in response to LGE.</p>","PeriodicalId":17883,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","volume":" ","pages":"318-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/92/kjo-2022-0012.PMC9388895.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Lacrimal Gland Extraction on the Contralateral Eye in an Animal Model for Dry Eye Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Minha Kim,&nbsp;So Young Kim,&nbsp;Ji Won Jeon,&nbsp;Hyung Keun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3341/kjo.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although there is still no consensus on the best animal model for dry eye disease research, a model based on lacrimal gland extraction (LGE) model is widely used. In this study, we aimed to investigate the histopathological changes taking place on the contralateral eye after unilateral LGE to determine whether it is useful as a control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were divided into naive control, environmental chamber model, and LGE groups. Corneal fluorescein staining was scored to quantify the severity of damage. Morphological changes in the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland (LG) were determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining and compared to those on naive control animals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to naive subjects, the unilateral LGE model showed enhanced corneal erosion scores and loss of conjunctival goblet cells, not only on the ipsilateral but also on the contralateral side. These changes in the ocular surface became more pronounced in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, loss of LG acinar cells and leukocyte infiltration were detected in the contralateral LGs of the LGE model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the changes observed in the ocular surface and LGs, the contralateral side of the LGE model may not offer proper control conditions for the experimental comparison of the effects of dry eye disease in vivo. There may be regulatory feedback or crosstalk system between both eyes activated in response to LGE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"318-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/92/kjo-2022-0012.PMC9388895.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管干眼病研究的最佳动物模型尚未达成共识,但基于泪腺提取(LGE)模型的模型被广泛使用。在本研究中,我们旨在研究单侧LGE后对侧眼的组织病理学变化,以确定是否可用作对照。方法:将7周龄雄性C57BL/6小鼠分为幼稚对照组、环境室模型组和LGE组。对角膜荧光素染色进行评分以量化损伤的严重程度。采用苏木精染色和伊红染色检测角膜、结膜和泪腺(LG)的形态学变化,并与对照组进行比较。结果:与幼稚受试者相比,单侧LGE模型不仅在同侧,而且在对侧均显示角膜侵蚀评分增加,结膜杯状细胞丢失。眼表的这些变化以一种随时间变化的方式变得更加明显。在LGE模型的对侧LGE中检测到LG腺泡细胞的丢失和白细胞的浸润。结论:考虑到观察到的眼表和LGs的变化,LGE模型的对侧可能不能为体内干眼病影响的实验比较提供适当的对照条件。双眼间可能存在调节反馈或串扰系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of Lacrimal Gland Extraction on the Contralateral Eye in an Animal Model for Dry Eye Disease.

Impact of Lacrimal Gland Extraction on the Contralateral Eye in an Animal Model for Dry Eye Disease.

Impact of Lacrimal Gland Extraction on the Contralateral Eye in an Animal Model for Dry Eye Disease.

Impact of Lacrimal Gland Extraction on the Contralateral Eye in an Animal Model for Dry Eye Disease.

Purpose: Although there is still no consensus on the best animal model for dry eye disease research, a model based on lacrimal gland extraction (LGE) model is widely used. In this study, we aimed to investigate the histopathological changes taking place on the contralateral eye after unilateral LGE to determine whether it is useful as a control.

Methods: Seven-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were divided into naive control, environmental chamber model, and LGE groups. Corneal fluorescein staining was scored to quantify the severity of damage. Morphological changes in the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland (LG) were determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining and compared to those on naive control animals.

Results: Compared to naive subjects, the unilateral LGE model showed enhanced corneal erosion scores and loss of conjunctival goblet cells, not only on the ipsilateral but also on the contralateral side. These changes in the ocular surface became more pronounced in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, loss of LG acinar cells and leukocyte infiltration were detected in the contralateral LGs of the LGE model.

Conclusions: Considering the changes observed in the ocular surface and LGs, the contralateral side of the LGE model may not offer proper control conditions for the experimental comparison of the effects of dry eye disease in vivo. There may be regulatory feedback or crosstalk system between both eyes activated in response to LGE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信