[研究方案:他汀类药物和依折麦布在75岁以上患者心血管疾病一级预防中的应用策略:健康结果分析]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2022-06-29
Natalia Alzueta Istúriz, Julen Fernández González, Amaya Echeverría Gorriti, Patricia García González, Lorea Sanz Álvarez, Mª Concepción Celaya Lecea, Oihane Goñi Zamarbide, Mª Teresa Acín Gericó, Rafael Bartolomé Resano, Javier Garjón Parra
{"title":"[研究方案:他汀类药物和依折麦布在75岁以上患者心血管疾病一级预防中的应用策略:健康结果分析]","authors":"Natalia Alzueta Istúriz,&nbsp;Julen Fernández González,&nbsp;Amaya Echeverría Gorriti,&nbsp;Patricia García González,&nbsp;Lorea Sanz Álvarez,&nbsp;Mª Concepción Celaya Lecea,&nbsp;Oihane Goñi Zamarbide,&nbsp;Mª Teresa Acín Gericó,&nbsp;Rafael Bartolomé Resano,&nbsp;Javier Garjón Parra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The benefit-risk balance of statins and ezetimibe as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is controversial in elderly patients due to the doubts about their effectiveness and certainty about adverse effects. The aim of this paper was to analyze health outcomes of a statin and ezetimibe deprescription strategy in patients aged 75 or older treated with these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational ambispective cohort study was made to evaluate health outcomes after the implementation of a strategy for deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in patients aged 75 or older who take these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. To avoid the risk of bias due to non-random assignment of patients to different groups, a propensity score will be calculated for each patient using logistic regression. The outcome of interest will be the deprescription or not of statins or ezetimibe. Time to hospital admission or death from any cause and other variables related to health outcomes will be analysed. Groups with and without statin or ezetimibe deprescription will be compared by survival analysis using Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is expected to obtain health outcomes of the strategy of deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in primary prevention in patients aged 75 or older. They will provide information on the advisability of continuing the strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Study protocol: <i>A strategy for deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients older than 75 years: health outcomes analysis.</i>]\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Alzueta Istúriz,&nbsp;Julen Fernández González,&nbsp;Amaya Echeverría Gorriti,&nbsp;Patricia García González,&nbsp;Lorea Sanz Álvarez,&nbsp;Mª Concepción Celaya Lecea,&nbsp;Oihane Goñi Zamarbide,&nbsp;Mª Teresa Acín Gericó,&nbsp;Rafael Bartolomé Resano,&nbsp;Javier Garjón Parra\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The benefit-risk balance of statins and ezetimibe as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is controversial in elderly patients due to the doubts about their effectiveness and certainty about adverse effects. The aim of this paper was to analyze health outcomes of a statin and ezetimibe deprescription strategy in patients aged 75 or older treated with these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational ambispective cohort study was made to evaluate health outcomes after the implementation of a strategy for deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in patients aged 75 or older who take these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. To avoid the risk of bias due to non-random assignment of patients to different groups, a propensity score will be calculated for each patient using logistic regression. The outcome of interest will be the deprescription or not of statins or ezetimibe. Time to hospital admission or death from any cause and other variables related to health outcomes will be analysed. Groups with and without statin or ezetimibe deprescription will be compared by survival analysis using Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is expected to obtain health outcomes of the strategy of deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in primary prevention in patients aged 75 or older. They will provide information on the advisability of continuing the strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:他汀类药物和依折替贝作为老年患者心血管疾病一级预防的利弊平衡存在争议,因为对其有效性存在疑问,对不良反应存在确定性。本论文的目的是分析75岁及以上患者使用他汀类药物和依折替贝去处方策略用于心血管疾病一级预防的健康结果。方法:一项观察性双视角队列研究,评估75岁及以上服用他汀类药物和依折替米布进行心血管疾病一级预防的患者在实施该策略后的健康结果。为了避免因患者非随机分配到不同组而产生的偏倚风险,将使用逻辑回归计算每个患者的倾向评分。感兴趣的结果将是他汀类药物或依折可布的停用或禁用。将分析入院时间或任何原因导致的死亡以及与健康结果相关的其他变量。有和没有他汀或依折麦布去处方组将通过生存分析进行比较,使用Cox回归来估计风险比。结论:在75岁及以上患者的一级预防中,他汀类药物和依折麦布联合应用可获得预期的健康结果。他们将提供关于继续该战略是否可取的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Study protocol: A strategy for deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients older than 75 years: health outcomes analysis.]

Objective: The benefit-risk balance of statins and ezetimibe as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is controversial in elderly patients due to the doubts about their effectiveness and certainty about adverse effects. The aim of this paper was to analyze health outcomes of a statin and ezetimibe deprescription strategy in patients aged 75 or older treated with these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Methods: An observational ambispective cohort study was made to evaluate health outcomes after the implementation of a strategy for deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in patients aged 75 or older who take these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. To avoid the risk of bias due to non-random assignment of patients to different groups, a propensity score will be calculated for each patient using logistic regression. The outcome of interest will be the deprescription or not of statins or ezetimibe. Time to hospital admission or death from any cause and other variables related to health outcomes will be analysed. Groups with and without statin or ezetimibe deprescription will be compared by survival analysis using Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio.

Conclusions: It is expected to obtain health outcomes of the strategy of deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in primary prevention in patients aged 75 or older. They will provide information on the advisability of continuing the strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信