COVID-19大流行期间养老院医生的道德困境。

Emily McLean, Kristine Husøy Onarheim, Elisabeth Schanche, Margrethe Aase Schaufel, Ingrid Miljeteig
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间养老院医生的道德困境。","authors":"Emily McLean,&nbsp;Kristine Husøy Onarheim,&nbsp;Elisabeth Schanche,&nbsp;Margrethe Aase Schaufel,&nbsp;Ingrid Miljeteig","doi":"10.4045/tidsskr.22.0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing home residents were particularly vulnerable to a serious clinical course of COVID-19. It was therefore decided early in the pandemic that nursing homes needed to be protected through measures such as testing and isolation regimens and restrictions on visiting. This entailed new procedures and guidelines for nursing home doctors. Norwegian and international studies show that the pandemic presented new ethical dilemmas for healthcare staff. The aim of this study was to provide a better understanding of the ethical issues faced by nursing home doctors during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Nine semi-structured in-depth interviews with doctors at five nursing homes in Bergen were analysed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The doctors told of challenges related to deciding the level of treatment, setting limits for palliative care, adapting visiting restrictions, and assessing the use of coercion with regard to testing and isolation. This entailed difficult ethical considerations whereby doctors were faced with conflicts of interest and value judgements, central to which was consideration for the individual resident versus society.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The nursing home doctors in our study found it difficult to find a balance between protecting the residents' autonomy and preventing the spread of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":520817,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical dilemmas for nursing home doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Emily McLean,&nbsp;Kristine Husøy Onarheim,&nbsp;Elisabeth Schanche,&nbsp;Margrethe Aase Schaufel,&nbsp;Ingrid Miljeteig\",\"doi\":\"10.4045/tidsskr.22.0156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing home residents were particularly vulnerable to a serious clinical course of COVID-19. It was therefore decided early in the pandemic that nursing homes needed to be protected through measures such as testing and isolation regimens and restrictions on visiting. This entailed new procedures and guidelines for nursing home doctors. Norwegian and international studies show that the pandemic presented new ethical dilemmas for healthcare staff. The aim of this study was to provide a better understanding of the ethical issues faced by nursing home doctors during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Nine semi-structured in-depth interviews with doctors at five nursing homes in Bergen were analysed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The doctors told of challenges related to deciding the level of treatment, setting limits for palliative care, adapting visiting restrictions, and assessing the use of coercion with regard to testing and isolation. This entailed difficult ethical considerations whereby doctors were faced with conflicts of interest and value judgements, central to which was consideration for the individual resident versus society.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The nursing home doctors in our study found it difficult to find a balance between protecting the residents' autonomy and preventing the spread of infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.22.0156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.22.0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:养老院居民特别容易受到COVID-19严重临床病程的影响。因此,在大流行早期就决定,需要通过检测和隔离方案以及限制访问等措施来保护养老院。这就需要养老院医生的新程序和指导方针。挪威和国际研究表明,疫情给医护人员带来了新的道德困境。本研究的目的是更好地了解大流行期间养老院医生面临的伦理问题。材料和方法:使用Attride-Stirling的主题网络分析,对卑尔根五家养老院的医生进行了九次半结构化深度访谈。结果:医生讲述了在决定治疗水平、设定姑息治疗限制、调整探视限制以及评估在检测和隔离方面强制使用的挑战。这涉及到困难的伦理考虑,即医生面临着利益冲突和价值判断,其核心是考虑个人居民与社会。解释:在我们的研究中,养老院医生发现很难在保护居民的自主权和防止感染的传播之间找到平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical dilemmas for nursing home doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Nursing home residents were particularly vulnerable to a serious clinical course of COVID-19. It was therefore decided early in the pandemic that nursing homes needed to be protected through measures such as testing and isolation regimens and restrictions on visiting. This entailed new procedures and guidelines for nursing home doctors. Norwegian and international studies show that the pandemic presented new ethical dilemmas for healthcare staff. The aim of this study was to provide a better understanding of the ethical issues faced by nursing home doctors during the pandemic.

Material and method: Nine semi-structured in-depth interviews with doctors at five nursing homes in Bergen were analysed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network analysis.

Results: The doctors told of challenges related to deciding the level of treatment, setting limits for palliative care, adapting visiting restrictions, and assessing the use of coercion with regard to testing and isolation. This entailed difficult ethical considerations whereby doctors were faced with conflicts of interest and value judgements, central to which was consideration for the individual resident versus society.

Interpretation: The nursing home doctors in our study found it difficult to find a balance between protecting the residents' autonomy and preventing the spread of infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信