{"title":"预测妊娠合并前置胎盘急诊剖宫产风险的产前因素评价。","authors":"Süleyman Cemil Oğlak, Fatma Ölmez, Şeyhmus Tunç","doi":"10.31486/toj.21.0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The optimal delivery timing for patients with placenta previa remains controversial in the literature. To reduce spontaneous vaginal bleeding rates, which occur increasingly with advancing gestational weeks, elective cesarean delivery is advocated between 36<sup>0/7</sup> and 37<sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestation, but this clinical approach does not take into consideration numerous patient variables. Few papers identify the risk factors for emergency cesarean delivery in patients with placenta previa. An enhanced understanding of these variables could help with determining patients at high risk for emergency cesarean delivery and individualizing delivery date scheduling. This study sought to identify predictor variables associated with emergency cesarean delivery in pregnant patients with placenta previa in a tertiary referral hospital. We also investigated differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes between patients with placenta previa who underwent emergency vs planned cesarean delivery. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 208 singleton pregnancy patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of placenta previa at the time of delivery and who underwent cesarean delivery in our hospital beyond 24 weeks of gestation. To define risk factors of the outcome variable (emergency vs planned cesarean delivery), univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis and adjusted odds ratios with their confidence intervals were calculated. <b>Results:</b> Ninety-seven patients (46.6%) required emergency cesarean delivery, and 111 patients (53.4%) underwent planned cesarean delivery. Antepartum bleeding episode (37.1% and 20.7%, <i>P</i>=0.013) and first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation (36.1% and 14.4%, <i>P</i><0.001) were significantly higher in the emergency group than the planned group. Antepartum bleeding episode (odds ratio [OR]=1.968, 95% CI 1.001-4.200, <i>P</i>=0.042), first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation (OR=2.750, 95% CI 1.315-5.748, <i>P</i>=0.007), and preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=0.713, 95% CI 0.595-0.854, <i>P</i><0.001) were the independent predictors significantly associated with emergency cesarean delivery. <b>Conclusion:</b> Three factors-antepartum bleeding episode during pregnancy, first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation, and lower preoperative hemoglobin level-might be useful in predicting emergency cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated with placenta previa.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"22 2","pages":"146-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196971/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Antepartum Factors for Predicting the Risk of Emergency Cesarean Delivery in Pregnancies Complicated With Placenta Previa.\",\"authors\":\"Süleyman Cemil Oğlak, Fatma Ölmez, Şeyhmus Tunç\",\"doi\":\"10.31486/toj.21.0138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The optimal delivery timing for patients with placenta previa remains controversial in the literature. To reduce spontaneous vaginal bleeding rates, which occur increasingly with advancing gestational weeks, elective cesarean delivery is advocated between 36<sup>0/7</sup> and 37<sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestation, but this clinical approach does not take into consideration numerous patient variables. Few papers identify the risk factors for emergency cesarean delivery in patients with placenta previa. An enhanced understanding of these variables could help with determining patients at high risk for emergency cesarean delivery and individualizing delivery date scheduling. This study sought to identify predictor variables associated with emergency cesarean delivery in pregnant patients with placenta previa in a tertiary referral hospital. We also investigated differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes between patients with placenta previa who underwent emergency vs planned cesarean delivery. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 208 singleton pregnancy patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of placenta previa at the time of delivery and who underwent cesarean delivery in our hospital beyond 24 weeks of gestation. To define risk factors of the outcome variable (emergency vs planned cesarean delivery), univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis and adjusted odds ratios with their confidence intervals were calculated. <b>Results:</b> Ninety-seven patients (46.6%) required emergency cesarean delivery, and 111 patients (53.4%) underwent planned cesarean delivery. Antepartum bleeding episode (37.1% and 20.7%, <i>P</i>=0.013) and first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation (36.1% and 14.4%, <i>P</i><0.001) were significantly higher in the emergency group than the planned group. Antepartum bleeding episode (odds ratio [OR]=1.968, 95% CI 1.001-4.200, <i>P</i>=0.042), first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation (OR=2.750, 95% CI 1.315-5.748, <i>P</i>=0.007), and preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=0.713, 95% CI 0.595-0.854, <i>P</i><0.001) were the independent predictors significantly associated with emergency cesarean delivery. <b>Conclusion:</b> Three factors-antepartum bleeding episode during pregnancy, first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation, and lower preoperative hemoglobin level-might be useful in predicting emergency cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated with placenta previa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ochsner Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"146-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9196971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ochsner Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.21.0138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.21.0138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
背景:前置胎盘患者的最佳分娩时机在文献中仍然存在争议。随着妊娠周的增加,自发性阴道出血的发生率越来越高,为了降低自发性阴道出血率,在妊娠360/7和376/7周之间提倡选择性剖宫产,但这种临床方法没有考虑到许多患者的变量。很少有论文确定前置胎盘患者紧急剖宫产的危险因素。加强对这些变量的了解有助于确定紧急剖宫产的高危患者和个性化分娩日期安排。本研究旨在确定与三级转诊医院前置胎盘孕妇紧急剖宫产相关的预测变量。我们还研究了前置胎盘患者接受急诊和计划剖宫产的产妇和围产期结局的差异。方法:回顾性队列研究纳入208例分娩时确诊为前置胎盘且妊娠24周以上在我院行剖宫产术的单胎妊娠患者。为了确定结局变量(紧急剖宫产与计划剖宫产)的危险因素,计算单因素和多因素logistic回归分析以及调整的优势比及其置信区间。结果:急诊剖宫产97例(46.6%),计划剖宫产111例(53.4%)。产前出血发作(37.1%、20.7%,P=0.013)、妊娠≤28周首次出血发作(36.1%、14.4%,PP=0.042)、妊娠≤28周首次出血发作(OR=2.750, 95% CI 1.315 ~ 5.748, P=0.007)、术前血红蛋白水平(OR=0.713, 95% CI 0.595 ~ 0.854, P)。妊娠期产前出血、妊娠≤28周的首次出血、术前血红蛋白水平较低可能有助于预测合并前置胎盘的妊娠紧急剖宫产。
Evaluation of Antepartum Factors for Predicting the Risk of Emergency Cesarean Delivery in Pregnancies Complicated With Placenta Previa.
Background: The optimal delivery timing for patients with placenta previa remains controversial in the literature. To reduce spontaneous vaginal bleeding rates, which occur increasingly with advancing gestational weeks, elective cesarean delivery is advocated between 360/7 and 376/7 weeks of gestation, but this clinical approach does not take into consideration numerous patient variables. Few papers identify the risk factors for emergency cesarean delivery in patients with placenta previa. An enhanced understanding of these variables could help with determining patients at high risk for emergency cesarean delivery and individualizing delivery date scheduling. This study sought to identify predictor variables associated with emergency cesarean delivery in pregnant patients with placenta previa in a tertiary referral hospital. We also investigated differences in maternal and perinatal outcomes between patients with placenta previa who underwent emergency vs planned cesarean delivery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 208 singleton pregnancy patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of placenta previa at the time of delivery and who underwent cesarean delivery in our hospital beyond 24 weeks of gestation. To define risk factors of the outcome variable (emergency vs planned cesarean delivery), univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis and adjusted odds ratios with their confidence intervals were calculated. Results: Ninety-seven patients (46.6%) required emergency cesarean delivery, and 111 patients (53.4%) underwent planned cesarean delivery. Antepartum bleeding episode (37.1% and 20.7%, P=0.013) and first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation (36.1% and 14.4%, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the emergency group than the planned group. Antepartum bleeding episode (odds ratio [OR]=1.968, 95% CI 1.001-4.200, P=0.042), first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation (OR=2.750, 95% CI 1.315-5.748, P=0.007), and preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=0.713, 95% CI 0.595-0.854, P<0.001) were the independent predictors significantly associated with emergency cesarean delivery. Conclusion: Three factors-antepartum bleeding episode during pregnancy, first antepartum bleeding episode ≤28 weeks of gestation, and lower preoperative hemoglobin level-might be useful in predicting emergency cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated with placenta previa.
期刊介绍:
The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.