在APRN共识模型中考虑急诊护士从业者作为一个群体:SWOT分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Wilbeck, Lorna Schumann, Amanda Comer, Wesley Davis
{"title":"在APRN共识模型中考虑急诊护士从业者作为一个群体:SWOT分析。","authors":"Jennifer Wilbeck,&nbsp;Lorna Schumann,&nbsp;Amanda Comer,&nbsp;Wesley Davis","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>After adoption of the 2008 Consensus Model for Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) Regulation, evolution of the nurse practitioner (NP) role and emergency NP (ENP) specialty has outpaced regulatory standards. Lack of uniformity among regulators, health insurance providers, and employers in acknowledging the ENP specialty has created barriers to practice and access to care. This article serves to identify potential outcomes if the ENP specialty was transitioned to a population within the Consensus Model of Regulation. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis methodology was used to assess ENP specialty current state, specifically focusing on the licensure, accreditation, certification, and education model for APRN regulation. The data were collected from peer-reviewed literature, clinical subject-matter experts, and academic and advanced practice executive leaders. Variances in ENP licensure, recognition, and acknowledgment among State Boards of Nursing leave the ENP specialty in a precarious position. For each of the strengths and opportunities that could exist in recognizing the ENP at the population level of the Consensus Model, there are abundant weaknesses and threats. Although full acknowledgment of the ENP specialty is lacking, regulatory implications are highly variable, and employers' understanding of the APRN educational model is limited, our findings reveal that the ENP specialty is an evolving role that deserves regulatory legitimization. Although ideal placement for the ENP within the Consensus Model remains to be determined, challenges and opportunities exist with both specialty and population options.</p>","PeriodicalId":48812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"1126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consideration of the emergency nurse practitioner as a population within the APRN Consensus Model: A SWOT analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Wilbeck,&nbsp;Lorna Schumann,&nbsp;Amanda Comer,&nbsp;Wesley Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>After adoption of the 2008 Consensus Model for Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) Regulation, evolution of the nurse practitioner (NP) role and emergency NP (ENP) specialty has outpaced regulatory standards. Lack of uniformity among regulators, health insurance providers, and employers in acknowledging the ENP specialty has created barriers to practice and access to care. This article serves to identify potential outcomes if the ENP specialty was transitioned to a population within the Consensus Model of Regulation. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis methodology was used to assess ENP specialty current state, specifically focusing on the licensure, accreditation, certification, and education model for APRN regulation. The data were collected from peer-reviewed literature, clinical subject-matter experts, and academic and advanced practice executive leaders. Variances in ENP licensure, recognition, and acknowledgment among State Boards of Nursing leave the ENP specialty in a precarious position. For each of the strengths and opportunities that could exist in recognizing the ENP at the population level of the Consensus Model, there are abundant weaknesses and threats. Although full acknowledgment of the ENP specialty is lacking, regulatory implications are highly variable, and employers' understanding of the APRN educational model is limited, our findings reveal that the ENP specialty is an evolving role that deserves regulatory legitimization. Although ideal placement for the ENP within the Consensus Model remains to be determined, challenges and opportunities exist with both specialty and population options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:2008年《高级执业注册护士(APRN)法规共识模型》通过后,执业护士(NP)角色和急诊NP (ENP)专业的发展速度超过了监管标准。监管机构、医疗保险提供商和雇主在承认ENP专业方面缺乏一致性,这对实践和获得护理造成了障碍。本文旨在确定如果ENP专业在监管共识模型内过渡到人群的潜在结果。采用优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)分析方法评估ENP专业的现状,特别关注APRN监管的许可、认证、认证和教育模式。数据收集自同行评议的文献、临床主题专家、学术和高级实践执行领导。国家护理委员会在ENP许可,认可和承认方面的差异使ENP专业处于不稳定的地位。对于在共识模式的人口层面上认识环境政策可能存在的每一个优势和机会来说,也存在着大量的弱点和威胁。尽管缺乏对ENP专业的充分认识,监管影响是高度可变的,雇主对APRN教育模式的理解是有限的,但我们的研究结果表明,ENP专业是一个不断发展的角色,值得监管合法化。虽然环境政策在共识模型中的理想位置仍有待确定,但专业和人口选择都存在挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consideration of the emergency nurse practitioner as a population within the APRN Consensus Model: A SWOT analysis.

Abstract: After adoption of the 2008 Consensus Model for Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) Regulation, evolution of the nurse practitioner (NP) role and emergency NP (ENP) specialty has outpaced regulatory standards. Lack of uniformity among regulators, health insurance providers, and employers in acknowledging the ENP specialty has created barriers to practice and access to care. This article serves to identify potential outcomes if the ENP specialty was transitioned to a population within the Consensus Model of Regulation. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis methodology was used to assess ENP specialty current state, specifically focusing on the licensure, accreditation, certification, and education model for APRN regulation. The data were collected from peer-reviewed literature, clinical subject-matter experts, and academic and advanced practice executive leaders. Variances in ENP licensure, recognition, and acknowledgment among State Boards of Nursing leave the ENP specialty in a precarious position. For each of the strengths and opportunities that could exist in recognizing the ENP at the population level of the Consensus Model, there are abundant weaknesses and threats. Although full acknowledgment of the ENP specialty is lacking, regulatory implications are highly variable, and employers' understanding of the APRN educational model is limited, our findings reveal that the ENP specialty is an evolving role that deserves regulatory legitimization. Although ideal placement for the ENP within the Consensus Model remains to be determined, challenges and opportunities exist with both specialty and population options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-NURSING
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信