SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测:验证和实际应用结果

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 VIROLOGY

Future Virology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-26 DOI:10.2217/fvl-2022-0045

Irena Grmek Kosnik, Urska Dermota, Andrej Golle, Tjasa Zohar Cretnik

{"title":"SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测:验证和实际应用结果","authors":"Irena Grmek Kosnik, Urska Dermota, Andrej Golle, Tjasa Zohar Cretnik","doi":"10.2217/fvl-2022-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To verify a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) compared with PCR. Materials & methods: Validation of RAT included 2295 subjects. Next matching of RAT with the PCR was checked in 13,852 subjects referred to PCR after being positive in RAT. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of RAT were 77.38 and 99.10%, respectively. A 74.60% of RAT positive results were confirmed with PCR. Conclusion: The test met WHO susceptibility criteria in a group of symptomatic subjects. In terms of specificity, it met requirements in all subjects. The concordance of RAT with PCR in real life was in line with our verification data.","PeriodicalId":12505,"journal":{"name":"Future Virology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/4b/fvl-2022-0045.PMC9514382.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2: results of validation and use in real life.\",\"authors\":\"Irena Grmek Kosnik, Urska Dermota, Andrej Golle, Tjasa Zohar Cretnik\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/fvl-2022-0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To verify a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) compared with PCR. Materials & methods: Validation of RAT included 2295 subjects. Next matching of RAT with the PCR was checked in 13,852 subjects referred to PCR after being positive in RAT. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of RAT were 77.38 and 99.10%, respectively. A 74.60% of RAT positive results were confirmed with PCR. Conclusion: The test met WHO susceptibility criteria in a group of symptomatic subjects. In terms of specificity, it met requirements in all subjects. The concordance of RAT with PCR in real life was in line with our verification data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Virology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/4b/fvl-2022-0045.PMC9514382.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2022-0045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2022-0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测(RAT)与PCR的比较。材料与方法:RAT验证纳入2295名受试者。对13852例鼠型抗体阳性的PCR参照者进行鼠型抗体与PCR的比对。结果:RAT的敏感性为77.38，特异性为99.10%。74.60%的RAT阳性结果经PCR证实。结论:该试验在有症状的人群中符合WHO的药敏标准。在专一性方面，满足了所有学科的要求。在实际生活中，RAT与PCR的一致性与我们的验证数据一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2: results of validation and use in real life.

Aim: To verify a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) compared with PCR. Materials & methods: Validation of RAT included 2295 subjects. Next matching of RAT with the PCR was checked in 13,852 subjects referred to PCR after being positive in RAT. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of RAT were 77.38 and 99.10%, respectively. A 74.60% of RAT positive results were confirmed with PCR. Conclusion: The test met WHO susceptibility criteria in a group of symptomatic subjects. In terms of specificity, it met requirements in all subjects. The concordance of RAT with PCR in real life was in line with our verification data.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Future Virology 医学-病毒学

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Future Virology is a peer-reviewed journal that delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this ever-expanding area of research. It is an interdisciplinary forum for all scientists working in the field today.