使用实用、稳健、可实施和可持续性模型加强虚拟儿科创伤中心的实施:一项混合方法研究。

Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2022-07-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2022.0020
Jennifer L Rosenthal, Sarah C Haynes, Bethney Bonilla, Katherine Rominger, Jacob Williams, April Sanders, Raynald A Orqueza Dizon, Kendra L Grether-Jones, James P Marcin, Michelle Y Hamline
{"title":"使用实用、稳健、可实施和可持续性模型加强虚拟儿科创伤中心的实施:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Jennifer L Rosenthal,&nbsp;Sarah C Haynes,&nbsp;Bethney Bonilla,&nbsp;Katherine Rominger,&nbsp;Jacob Williams,&nbsp;April Sanders,&nbsp;Raynald A Orqueza Dizon,&nbsp;Kendra L Grether-Jones,&nbsp;James P Marcin,&nbsp;Michelle Y Hamline","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2022.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article describes factors related to adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center intervention, which uses telehealth for trauma specialist consultations for seriously injured children. We aimed at (1) measuring RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) implementation outcomes and (2) identifying PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) contextual factors that influenced the implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interim implementation evaluation of our telehealth trial used a convergent mixed-methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric trauma encounters using electronic health records. The qualitative component was a thematic analysis of written and verbal feedback from providers and family advisory board meetings. We compared the quantitative and qualitative data by synthesizing them in a joint display table, organized by RE-AIM dimensions. We categorized these key findings into the PRISM domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first 10 months of this trial, 246 subjects were randomized, with 177 assigned to standard care and 69 assigned to telehealth. Four referring sites transitioned from standard care into their intervention period. PRISM contextual factors that influenced RE-AIM implementation outcomes included the following findings: Providers struggle to remember, interpret, and navigate intervention workflows; providers have preconceived ideas about the intervention purpose; the intervention mitigates parents' anxieties about the transfer process.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study revealed implementation challenges that influence the overall success of this telehealth trial. Early identification of these challenges allows our team the opportunity to address them now to optimize the intervention reach, adoption, and implementation. This early action will ultimately enhance the success of our trial and the ability of our intervention to achieve broad impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518803/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing the Implementation of the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center Using Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Rosenthal,&nbsp;Sarah C Haynes,&nbsp;Bethney Bonilla,&nbsp;Katherine Rominger,&nbsp;Jacob Williams,&nbsp;April Sanders,&nbsp;Raynald A Orqueza Dizon,&nbsp;Kendra L Grether-Jones,&nbsp;James P Marcin,&nbsp;Michelle Y Hamline\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2022.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article describes factors related to adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center intervention, which uses telehealth for trauma specialist consultations for seriously injured children. We aimed at (1) measuring RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) implementation outcomes and (2) identifying PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) contextual factors that influenced the implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This interim implementation evaluation of our telehealth trial used a convergent mixed-methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric trauma encounters using electronic health records. The qualitative component was a thematic analysis of written and verbal feedback from providers and family advisory board meetings. We compared the quantitative and qualitative data by synthesizing them in a joint display table, organized by RE-AIM dimensions. We categorized these key findings into the PRISM domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first 10 months of this trial, 246 subjects were randomized, with 177 assigned to standard care and 69 assigned to telehealth. Four referring sites transitioned from standard care into their intervention period. PRISM contextual factors that influenced RE-AIM implementation outcomes included the following findings: Providers struggle to remember, interpret, and navigate intervention workflows; providers have preconceived ideas about the intervention purpose; the intervention mitigates parents' anxieties about the transfer process.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study revealed implementation challenges that influence the overall success of this telehealth trial. Early identification of these challenges allows our team the opportunity to address them now to optimize the intervention reach, adoption, and implementation. This early action will ultimately enhance the success of our trial and the ability of our intervention to achieve broad impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:本文描述了虚拟儿科创伤中心干预的采用、实施和有效性的相关因素,该干预使用远程医疗为严重受伤儿童的创伤专家咨询。我们的目标是(1)测量RE-AIM(覆盖、有效性、采用、实施、维护)的实施结果和(2)确定影响实施结果的PRISM(实用、稳健、实施和可持续性模型)的背景因素。方法:对我们远程医疗试验的中期实施评估采用融合混合方法设计。定量部分是使用电子健康记录对儿科创伤遭遇进行横断面分析。质量部分是对提供者和家庭咨询委员会会议的书面和口头反馈进行专题分析。我们通过将定量和定性数据综合在一个联合显示表中进行比较,并按RE-AIM维度组织。我们将这些关键发现归类为PRISM域。结果:在试验的前10个月,246名受试者被随机分配,其中177人被分配到标准护理,69人被分配到远程医疗。四个转诊点从标准治疗过渡到干预期。影响RE-AIM实施结果的PRISM背景因素包括以下发现:提供者难以记住、解释和导航干预工作流程;提供者对干预目的有先入为主的想法;这种干预减轻了家长对转学过程的焦虑。讨论:本研究揭示了影响远程医疗试验总体成功的实施挑战。早期识别这些挑战使我们的团队有机会现在就解决它们,以优化干预措施的范围、采用和实施。这一早期行动将最终促进我们试验的成功和我们的干预产生广泛影响的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhancing the Implementation of the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center Using Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Enhancing the Implementation of the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center Using Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Background: This article describes factors related to adoption, implementation, and effectiveness of the Virtual Pediatric Trauma Center intervention, which uses telehealth for trauma specialist consultations for seriously injured children. We aimed at (1) measuring RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) implementation outcomes and (2) identifying PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) contextual factors that influenced the implementation outcomes.

Methods: This interim implementation evaluation of our telehealth trial used a convergent mixed-methods design. The quantitative component was a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric trauma encounters using electronic health records. The qualitative component was a thematic analysis of written and verbal feedback from providers and family advisory board meetings. We compared the quantitative and qualitative data by synthesizing them in a joint display table, organized by RE-AIM dimensions. We categorized these key findings into the PRISM domains.

Results: During the first 10 months of this trial, 246 subjects were randomized, with 177 assigned to standard care and 69 assigned to telehealth. Four referring sites transitioned from standard care into their intervention period. PRISM contextual factors that influenced RE-AIM implementation outcomes included the following findings: Providers struggle to remember, interpret, and navigate intervention workflows; providers have preconceived ideas about the intervention purpose; the intervention mitigates parents' anxieties about the transfer process.

Discussion: This study revealed implementation challenges that influence the overall success of this telehealth trial. Early identification of these challenges allows our team the opportunity to address them now to optimize the intervention reach, adoption, and implementation. This early action will ultimately enhance the success of our trial and the ability of our intervention to achieve broad impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信