法语版嗅觉障碍问卷的效度和信度。

IF 2.2
Jérôme R Lechien, Luigi A Vaira, Serge D Le Bon, Roxane Geerts, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Sven Saussez
{"title":"法语版嗅觉障碍问卷的效度和信度。","authors":"Jérôme R Lechien,&nbsp;Luigi A Vaira,&nbsp;Serge D Le Bon,&nbsp;Roxane Geerts,&nbsp;Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo,&nbsp;Sven Saussez","doi":"10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with olfactory disorder (OD) and controls were enrolled from two medical centers. Individuals completed the Fr-ODQ and the French version of the sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The extended Sniffin'Sticks procedure was used to test odor Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI). Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of Fr-ODQ. The reliability and the external validity were evaluated through a test-retest approach and by correlating Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine patients with OD and 65 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.827, reporting adequate internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was high (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.944, p = 0.001). The external validity was adequate regarding the significant correlation between Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.498; p = 0.001). Patients with OD reported a significant higher score of Fr-ODQ than healthy individuals (p < 0.001), indicating a high internal validity. The baseline Fr-ODQ significantly improved after 3-month olfactory training, which corroborated the improvement of TDI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Fr-ODQ is the first patient-reported outcome questionnaire validated for French speaking patients. Fr-ODQ is reliable and valid for the evaluation of the olfactory dysfunction and the related impact on quality of life of French-speaking patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","volume":" ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526523/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme R Lechien,&nbsp;Luigi A Vaira,&nbsp;Serge D Le Bon,&nbsp;Roxane Geerts,&nbsp;Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo,&nbsp;Sven Saussez\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate a French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with olfactory disorder (OD) and controls were enrolled from two medical centers. Individuals completed the Fr-ODQ and the French version of the sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The extended Sniffin'Sticks procedure was used to test odor Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI). Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of Fr-ODQ. The reliability and the external validity were evaluated through a test-retest approach and by correlating Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine patients with OD and 65 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.827, reporting adequate internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was high (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.944, p = 0.001). The external validity was adequate regarding the significant correlation between Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.498; p = 0.001). Patients with OD reported a significant higher score of Fr-ODQ than healthy individuals (p < 0.001), indicating a high internal validity. The baseline Fr-ODQ significantly improved after 3-month olfactory training, which corroborated the improvement of TDI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Fr-ODQ is the first patient-reported outcome questionnaire validated for French speaking patients. Fr-ODQ is reliable and valid for the evaluation of the olfactory dysfunction and the related impact on quality of life of French-speaking patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00598-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:验证法语版嗅觉障碍问卷(Fr-ODQ)。方法:从两个医疗中心招募嗅觉障碍(OD)患者和对照组。受试者完成了Fr-ODQ和法语版鼻窦预后工具-22 (SNOT-22)。扩展嗅探棒程序用于测试气味阈值,辨别和识别(TDI)。采用Cronbach’s alpha测量r- odq的内部一致性。信度和外部效度通过测试-重测方法和通过关联r- odq和SNOT-22分数来评估。结果:89例OD患者和65例健康个体完成了评估。Cronbach’s alpha为0.827,表明内部一致性较好。重测信度高(rs = 0.944, p = 0.001)。r- odq与SNOT-22有显著相关,外部效度足够(rs = 0.498;p = 0.001)。OD患者报告的Fr-ODQ评分明显高于健康个体(p结论:Fr-ODQ是第一个针对法语患者的患者报告的结果问卷。Fr-ODQ用于评价法语患者嗅觉功能障碍及其对生活质量的影响是可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of a french version of the olfactory disorders questionnaire.

Objective: To validate a French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ).

Methods: Patients with olfactory disorder (OD) and controls were enrolled from two medical centers. Individuals completed the Fr-ODQ and the French version of the sinonasal outcome tool-22 (SNOT-22). The extended Sniffin'Sticks procedure was used to test odor Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI). Cronbach's alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of Fr-ODQ. The reliability and the external validity were evaluated through a test-retest approach and by correlating Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 scores.

Results: Eighty-nine patients with OD and 65 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.827, reporting adequate internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was high (rs = 0.944, p = 0.001). The external validity was adequate regarding the significant correlation between Fr-ODQ and SNOT-22 (rs = 0.498; p = 0.001). Patients with OD reported a significant higher score of Fr-ODQ than healthy individuals (p < 0.001), indicating a high internal validity. The baseline Fr-ODQ significantly improved after 3-month olfactory training, which corroborated the improvement of TDI scores.

Conclusion: The Fr-ODQ is the first patient-reported outcome questionnaire validated for French speaking patients. Fr-ODQ is reliable and valid for the evaluation of the olfactory dysfunction and the related impact on quality of life of French-speaking patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信