{"title":"IA期以实性为主的非小细胞肺癌中极小地玻璃不透明成分的预后影响","authors":"Aritoshi Hattori MD , Takeshi Matsunaga MD , Mariko Fukui MD , Kazuhiro Suzuki MD , Kazuya Takamochi MD , Kenji Suzuki MD","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We evaluated the prognostic role of the presence of a very small ground glass opacity<span> (GGO) component in stage IA solid-predominant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated surgically resected 1471 patients diagnosed with stage IA solid-predominant NSCLC. They were classified into 3 groups; that is, GGO group (0.5<CTR<0.9), Very small GGO group (0.9≤CTR<1.0), and the Solid group (CTR = 1.0). The prognostic influence of a very small GGO component was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. In total, 523 GGO groups, 91 Very small GGO groups, and 857 Solid groups were identified. The median CTR of the Very small GGO group was 0.92 ± 0.02 (range, 0.90–0.97). Both the pathological characteristics and survival outcome was similar between GGO group and Very small GGO group (5 year-OS, 91.7% Vs 89.8%, </span></span><em>P</em> = 0.374). However, several pathological findings including nodal involvement (8% Vs 20%, <em>P</em> = 0.004), lymphatic (12% Vs 27%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) or vascular (18% Vs 37%, <em>P</em> < 0.001) invasion or spread through alveolar space (9% Vs 23%, <em>P</em> = 0.004) were significantly different in comparison between Very small GGO and Solid group. Accordingly, the 5-year OS significantly differed between the groups (89.8% Vs 72.5%, <em>P</em> < 0.001), which was also demonstrated in the propensity score-matched cohort (89.4% Vs 79.2%; <em>P</em> = 0.019). Prognostic impact of a very small GGO component is relevant in stage IA solid-predominant NSCLC. In the future, it is necessary to confirm these data using larger multi-institutional datasets that are more appropriately powered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 251-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Impact of Very Small Ground-Glass Opacity Component in Stage IA Solid Predominant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Aritoshi Hattori MD , Takeshi Matsunaga MD , Mariko Fukui MD , Kazuhiro Suzuki MD , Kazuya Takamochi MD , Kenji Suzuki MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>We evaluated the prognostic role of the presence of a very small ground glass opacity<span> (GGO) component in stage IA solid-predominant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated surgically resected 1471 patients diagnosed with stage IA solid-predominant NSCLC. They were classified into 3 groups; that is, GGO group (0.5<CTR<0.9), Very small GGO group (0.9≤CTR<1.0), and the Solid group (CTR = 1.0). The prognostic influence of a very small GGO component was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. In total, 523 GGO groups, 91 Very small GGO groups, and 857 Solid groups were identified. The median CTR of the Very small GGO group was 0.92 ± 0.02 (range, 0.90–0.97). Both the pathological characteristics and survival outcome was similar between GGO group and Very small GGO group (5 year-OS, 91.7% Vs 89.8%, </span></span><em>P</em> = 0.374). However, several pathological findings including nodal involvement (8% Vs 20%, <em>P</em> = 0.004), lymphatic (12% Vs 27%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) or vascular (18% Vs 37%, <em>P</em> < 0.001) invasion or spread through alveolar space (9% Vs 23%, <em>P</em> = 0.004) were significantly different in comparison between Very small GGO and Solid group. Accordingly, the 5-year OS significantly differed between the groups (89.8% Vs 72.5%, <em>P</em> < 0.001), which was also demonstrated in the propensity score-matched cohort (89.4% Vs 79.2%; <em>P</em> = 0.019). Prognostic impact of a very small GGO component is relevant in stage IA solid-predominant NSCLC. In the future, it is necessary to confirm these data using larger multi-institutional datasets that are more appropriately powered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 251-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922002234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043067922002234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们评估了IA期以实变为主的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中出现极小磨玻璃不透明(GGO)成分的预后作用。我们对 1471 例经手术切除确诊的 IA 期实性为主的非小细胞肺癌患者进行了评估。他们被分为三组,即 GGO 组(0.5
Prognostic Impact of Very Small Ground-Glass Opacity Component in Stage IA Solid Predominant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
We evaluated the prognostic role of the presence of a very small ground glass opacity (GGO) component in stage IA solid-predominant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated surgically resected 1471 patients diagnosed with stage IA solid-predominant NSCLC. They were classified into 3 groups; that is, GGO group (0.5<CTR<0.9), Very small GGO group (0.9≤CTR<1.0), and the Solid group (CTR = 1.0). The prognostic influence of a very small GGO component was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. In total, 523 GGO groups, 91 Very small GGO groups, and 857 Solid groups were identified. The median CTR of the Very small GGO group was 0.92 ± 0.02 (range, 0.90–0.97). Both the pathological characteristics and survival outcome was similar between GGO group and Very small GGO group (5 year-OS, 91.7% Vs 89.8%, P = 0.374). However, several pathological findings including nodal involvement (8% Vs 20%, P = 0.004), lymphatic (12% Vs 27%, P = 0.003) or vascular (18% Vs 37%, P < 0.001) invasion or spread through alveolar space (9% Vs 23%, P = 0.004) were significantly different in comparison between Very small GGO and Solid group. Accordingly, the 5-year OS significantly differed between the groups (89.8% Vs 72.5%, P < 0.001), which was also demonstrated in the propensity score-matched cohort (89.4% Vs 79.2%; P = 0.019). Prognostic impact of a very small GGO component is relevant in stage IA solid-predominant NSCLC. In the future, it is necessary to confirm these data using larger multi-institutional datasets that are more appropriately powered.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.