泰国老年人的认知筛选评估:简短心理测验的信度和效度的前瞻性研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Health Research Pub Date : 2022-01-13 Epub Date: 2021-02-18 DOI:10.1108/jhr-02-2020-0049
Kamonthip Tanglakmankhong, Benjamin M Hampstead, Robert J Ploutz-Snyder, Kathleen Potempa
{"title":"泰国老年人的认知筛选评估:简短心理测验的信度和效度的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Kamonthip Tanglakmankhong,&nbsp;Benjamin M Hampstead,&nbsp;Robert J Ploutz-Snyder,&nbsp;Kathleen Potempa","doi":"10.1108/jhr-02-2020-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose –: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to examine the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and the agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach –: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 446 older adults who were recruited by cluster sampling from 200,481 adults aged more than 60 years. For each participant, the AMT was administered by village health volunteers and, on a separate day, by a trained professional who also administered the MMSE. Descriptive statistics, Bland and Altman levels of agreement, and Receiver Operator Curves (ROCs) were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Findings –: </strong>Administration of the AMT by village health volunteers during the annual health screening found cognitive impairment in only 1.12% of the sample. When the AMT was given to these same individuals by trained professionals, the rate of cognitive impairment was almost 24 times greater. Two items in the Thai AMT may require modification due to markedly elevated failure rates. At the cut score of 8, the sensitivity and specificity of the AMT relative to the MMSE were moderate (78.83 and 66.67%, respectively). The degree of agreement between AMT and MMSE was 0.49 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the correlation between the difference scores and the mean is exceptionally low (0.048).</p><p><strong>Originality/value –: </strong>Reliable and valid cognitive screening assessment requires the administrator to be well trained and the tools to be appropriate for the population. Although AMT is short and easy for a nonprofessional to administer, some items were not suitable due to construct validity and contextual issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518824/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive screening assessment in Thai older adults: a prospective study of the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test.\",\"authors\":\"Kamonthip Tanglakmankhong,&nbsp;Benjamin M Hampstead,&nbsp;Robert J Ploutz-Snyder,&nbsp;Kathleen Potempa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jhr-02-2020-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose –: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to examine the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and the agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach –: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 446 older adults who were recruited by cluster sampling from 200,481 adults aged more than 60 years. For each participant, the AMT was administered by village health volunteers and, on a separate day, by a trained professional who also administered the MMSE. Descriptive statistics, Bland and Altman levels of agreement, and Receiver Operator Curves (ROCs) were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Findings –: </strong>Administration of the AMT by village health volunteers during the annual health screening found cognitive impairment in only 1.12% of the sample. When the AMT was given to these same individuals by trained professionals, the rate of cognitive impairment was almost 24 times greater. Two items in the Thai AMT may require modification due to markedly elevated failure rates. At the cut score of 8, the sensitivity and specificity of the AMT relative to the MMSE were moderate (78.83 and 66.67%, respectively). The degree of agreement between AMT and MMSE was 0.49 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the correlation between the difference scores and the mean is exceptionally low (0.048).</p><p><strong>Originality/value –: </strong>Reliable and valid cognitive screening assessment requires the administrator to be well trained and the tools to be appropriate for the population. Although AMT is short and easy for a nonprofessional to administer, some items were not suitable due to construct validity and contextual issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9518824/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jhr-02-2020-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jhr-02-2020-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本文的目的是检验简略心理测验(AMT)的信度和效度,以及与简易精神状态测验(MMSE)的一致性。设计/方法/方法:这项横断面研究包括446名老年人,他们是通过整群抽样从200,481名60岁以上的成年人中招募的。对于每个参与者,AMT由村卫生志愿者管理,并在另外一天由训练有素的专业人员管理,该专业人员也管理MMSE。采用描述性统计、Bland和Altman一致性水平和接受者算子曲线(roc)对数据进行分析。研究结果-:在年度健康筛查期间,由村卫生志愿者管理的AMT仅在1.12%的样本中发现认知障碍。当由训练有素的专业人员给这些人进行AMT治疗时,认知障碍的发生率几乎高出24倍。泰国AMT中的两个项目可能需要修改,因为故障率明显升高。cut评分为8分时,AMT相对于MMSE的敏感性和特异性均为中等,分别为78.83和66.67%。AMT与MMSE之间的一致性程度为0.49 (p < 0.001),差异评分与平均值之间的相关性异常低(0.048)。原创性/价值-:可靠和有效的认知筛选评估要求管理人员受过良好的培训,并且工具适合人群。虽然AMT简短且易于非专业人员管理,但由于结构效度和上下文问题,有些项目不适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cognitive screening assessment in Thai older adults: a prospective study of the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test.

Cognitive screening assessment in Thai older adults: a prospective study of the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test.

Cognitive screening assessment in Thai older adults: a prospective study of the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test.

Purpose –: The purpose of this paper is to examine the reliability and validity of the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and the agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Design/methodology/approach –: This cross-sectional study included 446 older adults who were recruited by cluster sampling from 200,481 adults aged more than 60 years. For each participant, the AMT was administered by village health volunteers and, on a separate day, by a trained professional who also administered the MMSE. Descriptive statistics, Bland and Altman levels of agreement, and Receiver Operator Curves (ROCs) were used to analyze data.

Findings –: Administration of the AMT by village health volunteers during the annual health screening found cognitive impairment in only 1.12% of the sample. When the AMT was given to these same individuals by trained professionals, the rate of cognitive impairment was almost 24 times greater. Two items in the Thai AMT may require modification due to markedly elevated failure rates. At the cut score of 8, the sensitivity and specificity of the AMT relative to the MMSE were moderate (78.83 and 66.67%, respectively). The degree of agreement between AMT and MMSE was 0.49 (p < 0.001) and the correlation between the difference scores and the mean is exceptionally low (0.048).

Originality/value –: Reliable and valid cognitive screening assessment requires the administrator to be well trained and the tools to be appropriate for the population. Although AMT is short and easy for a nonprofessional to administer, some items were not suitable due to construct validity and contextual issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信