从非正规经济到正规经济的过渡:需要一个多方面的方法。

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Indian Journal of Labour Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s41027-022-00398-2
Kamala Sankaran
{"title":"从非正规经济到正规经济的过渡:需要一个多方面的方法。","authors":"Kamala Sankaran","doi":"10.1007/s41027-022-00398-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent international attention paid to the formalization of the informal economy finds reflection in ILO Recommendation No. 204 concerning the transition from the informal to the formal economy and the Sustainable Development Goals (Target 8.3). There is great diversity within the categories of the informal sector, informal employment, and informal economy in India. This paper examines the category of the 'informal economy' as understood in international instruments as well as in international statistics and maps these onto legal categories recognized within Indian law. The categories of 'employed', 'engaged', and 'work arrangement' used in Indian laws, and their interpretation by the courts, are useful to understand the links between the concepts of work, employment, and livelihoods. The paper also focuses on the diversity of the informal economy, focusing on wage employment, self-employment, including the diverse forms of own-account work and contributing (unpaid) family labour. The categorization of gig and platform workers as own-account or waged workers continues to pose a normative challenge. The regulatory responses for formalization of each segmented category of informal workers and informal enterprises cannot be uniform, and neither do they need to be linked to any particular domain of the law. Moving beyond the extension of social security coverage as the key vehicle for formalization, the paper suggests various entry points through which law and policy can improve conditions of work and protect the livelihood of those in the informal economy as measures to achieve formalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":34915,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Labour Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491659/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy: The Need for a Multi-faceted Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Kamala Sankaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41027-022-00398-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent international attention paid to the formalization of the informal economy finds reflection in ILO Recommendation No. 204 concerning the transition from the informal to the formal economy and the Sustainable Development Goals (Target 8.3). There is great diversity within the categories of the informal sector, informal employment, and informal economy in India. This paper examines the category of the 'informal economy' as understood in international instruments as well as in international statistics and maps these onto legal categories recognized within Indian law. The categories of 'employed', 'engaged', and 'work arrangement' used in Indian laws, and their interpretation by the courts, are useful to understand the links between the concepts of work, employment, and livelihoods. The paper also focuses on the diversity of the informal economy, focusing on wage employment, self-employment, including the diverse forms of own-account work and contributing (unpaid) family labour. The categorization of gig and platform workers as own-account or waged workers continues to pose a normative challenge. The regulatory responses for formalization of each segmented category of informal workers and informal enterprises cannot be uniform, and neither do they need to be linked to any particular domain of the law. Moving beyond the extension of social security coverage as the key vehicle for formalization, the paper suggests various entry points through which law and policy can improve conditions of work and protect the livelihood of those in the informal economy as measures to achieve formalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Labour Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491659/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Labour Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00398-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00398-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近国际社会对非正规经济正规化的关注反映在劳工组织关于从非正规经济向正规经济过渡的第204号建议和可持续发展目标(具体目标8.3)中。在印度,非正规部门、非正规就业和非正规经济的类别存在很大的差异。本文考察了国际文书以及国际统计中所理解的“非正式经济”的类别,并将其映射到印度法律承认的法律类别上。印度法律中使用的“受雇”、“参与”和“工作安排”的类别,以及法院对这些类别的解释,有助于理解工作、就业和生计概念之间的联系。该文件还侧重于非正式经济的多样性,侧重于工资就业、自营职业,包括各种形式的自营工作和贡献(无偿)家庭劳动。将零工和平台工人分类为自营工人或有偿工人继续构成规范挑战。对非正规工人和非正规企业的每一细分类别的正规化的管制反应不可能是统一的,它们也不需要与任何特定的法律领域联系起来。除了将扩大社会保障覆盖面作为正规化的关键手段之外,本文还提出了各种切入点,通过这些切入点,法律和政策可以改善工作条件,保护非正规经济中的人们的生计,作为实现正规化的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy: The Need for a Multi-faceted Approach.

The recent international attention paid to the formalization of the informal economy finds reflection in ILO Recommendation No. 204 concerning the transition from the informal to the formal economy and the Sustainable Development Goals (Target 8.3). There is great diversity within the categories of the informal sector, informal employment, and informal economy in India. This paper examines the category of the 'informal economy' as understood in international instruments as well as in international statistics and maps these onto legal categories recognized within Indian law. The categories of 'employed', 'engaged', and 'work arrangement' used in Indian laws, and their interpretation by the courts, are useful to understand the links between the concepts of work, employment, and livelihoods. The paper also focuses on the diversity of the informal economy, focusing on wage employment, self-employment, including the diverse forms of own-account work and contributing (unpaid) family labour. The categorization of gig and platform workers as own-account or waged workers continues to pose a normative challenge. The regulatory responses for formalization of each segmented category of informal workers and informal enterprises cannot be uniform, and neither do they need to be linked to any particular domain of the law. Moving beyond the extension of social security coverage as the key vehicle for formalization, the paper suggests various entry points through which law and policy can improve conditions of work and protect the livelihood of those in the informal economy as measures to achieve formalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Labour Economics
Indian Journal of Labour Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Labour Economics (IJLE) is one of the few prominent Journals of its kind from South Asia. It provides eminent economists and academicians an exclusive forum for an analysis and understanding of issues pertaining to labour economics, industrial relations including supply and demand of labour services, personnel economics, distribution of income, unions and collective bargaining, applied and policy issues in labour economics, and labour markets and demographics. The journal includes peer reviewed articles, research notes, sections on promising new theoretical developments, comparative labour market policies or subjects that have the attention of labour economists and labour market students in general, particularly in the context of India and other developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信