玻璃体切除联合黄斑脱离治疗难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿的速度比单纯玻璃体切除更快。

Ying Yan, Li Zhu, Miao Zeng, Zhijian Huang, Qin Ding, Yang Liu, Chengyuan Gao, Doudou Yu, Xiao Chen
{"title":"玻璃体切除联合黄斑脱离治疗难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿的速度比单纯玻璃体切除更快。","authors":"Ying Yan,&nbsp;Li Zhu,&nbsp;Miao Zeng,&nbsp;Zhijian Huang,&nbsp;Qin Ding,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Chengyuan Gao,&nbsp;Doudou Yu,&nbsp;Xiao Chen","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema managed by vitrectomy combined with and without intentional macular detachment (IMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. Forty-one eyes with diabetic macular edema that were previously poorly responsive to at least 5 monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and at least twice switch therapy previously were included in this study. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling, 21 of which were combined with an IMD procedure (assigned to an IMD group) and 20 of which did not have IMD performed (nMD group). Macular morphologic and visual acuity changes were analyzed from baseline through the endpoint (24 weeks) postprocedure, and were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed at least six months of follow-up, with a mean of 29.7 weeks (24-56 weeks). The mean central retinal thickness reduction was greater in the IMD group than that in the nMD group at 1 week (P = 0.001), 2 weeks (P = 0.008), and 4 weeks (P = 0.004), but there was no statistically significant difference at 12 weeks (P = 0.051) or 24 weeks (P = 0.056). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to the 24 weeks endpoint in either group (P = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitrectomy can release macular edema in the eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema. Combined with IMD technical, patients seemed to achieve a faster central retinal thickness decrease but neither the final morphologic outcome nor the visual acuity was affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":377573,"journal":{"name":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"1859-1866"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMBINATION OF VITRECTOMY AND INTENTIONAL MACULAR DETACHMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A FASTER EDEMATOUS REGRESSION THAN VITRECTOMY ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Yan,&nbsp;Li Zhu,&nbsp;Miao Zeng,&nbsp;Zhijian Huang,&nbsp;Qin Ding,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Chengyuan Gao,&nbsp;Doudou Yu,&nbsp;Xiao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IAE.0000000000003536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema managed by vitrectomy combined with and without intentional macular detachment (IMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. Forty-one eyes with diabetic macular edema that were previously poorly responsive to at least 5 monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and at least twice switch therapy previously were included in this study. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling, 21 of which were combined with an IMD procedure (assigned to an IMD group) and 20 of which did not have IMD performed (nMD group). Macular morphologic and visual acuity changes were analyzed from baseline through the endpoint (24 weeks) postprocedure, and were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed at least six months of follow-up, with a mean of 29.7 weeks (24-56 weeks). The mean central retinal thickness reduction was greater in the IMD group than that in the nMD group at 1 week (P = 0.001), 2 weeks (P = 0.008), and 4 weeks (P = 0.004), but there was no statistically significant difference at 12 weeks (P = 0.051) or 24 weeks (P = 0.056). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to the 24 weeks endpoint in either group (P = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitrectomy can release macular edema in the eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema. Combined with IMD technical, patients seemed to achieve a faster central retinal thickness decrease but neither the final morphologic outcome nor the visual acuity was affected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":377573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1859-1866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较玻璃体切除术合并和不合并有意性黄斑脱离(IMD)治疗难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿的临床效果。方法:回顾性队列研究。41只患有糖尿病黄斑水肿的眼睛,先前对至少5个月的抗血管内皮生长因子和至少两次的转换治疗反应不良。所有的眼睛都接受了玻璃体切割和内限制膜剥离,其中21只合并了IMD手术(被分配到IMD组),20只没有进行IMD手术(nMD组)。从基线到终点(术后24周)分析黄斑形态和视力变化,并进行组间比较。结果:所有患者均完成了至少6个月的随访,平均29.7周(24-56周)。IMD组在1周(P = 0.001)、2周(P = 0.008)和4周(P = 0.004)时视网膜中央厚度的平均减少量大于nMD组,但在12周(P = 0.051)和24周(P = 0.056)时差异无统计学意义。两组最佳矫正视力从基线到24周终点的平均变化无显著差异(P = 0.83)。结论:玻璃体切除术可缓解难治性糖尿病黄斑水肿。结合IMD技术,患者似乎实现了更快的中央视网膜厚度下降,但最终形态学结果和视力均未受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMBINATION OF VITRECTOMY AND INTENTIONAL MACULAR DETACHMENT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A FASTER EDEMATOUS REGRESSION THAN VITRECTOMY ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA.

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema managed by vitrectomy combined with and without intentional macular detachment (IMD).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Forty-one eyes with diabetic macular edema that were previously poorly responsive to at least 5 monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and at least twice switch therapy previously were included in this study. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling, 21 of which were combined with an IMD procedure (assigned to an IMD group) and 20 of which did not have IMD performed (nMD group). Macular morphologic and visual acuity changes were analyzed from baseline through the endpoint (24 weeks) postprocedure, and were compared between groups.

Results: All patients completed at least six months of follow-up, with a mean of 29.7 weeks (24-56 weeks). The mean central retinal thickness reduction was greater in the IMD group than that in the nMD group at 1 week (P = 0.001), 2 weeks (P = 0.008), and 4 weeks (P = 0.004), but there was no statistically significant difference at 12 weeks (P = 0.051) or 24 weeks (P = 0.056). There were no significant differences in the mean changes of best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to the 24 weeks endpoint in either group (P = 0.83).

Conclusion: Vitrectomy can release macular edema in the eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema. Combined with IMD technical, patients seemed to achieve a faster central retinal thickness decrease but neither the final morphologic outcome nor the visual acuity was affected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信