Hanxiang Liu, Lin Liu, Shijie Xu, Zhonglin Lu, Greta S Mok, Yingwei Wang, Yi Tao, Yue Chen
{"title":"与有序子集期望最大化重构相比,总变差正则化期望最大化重构提高了68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT图像质量。","authors":"Hanxiang Liu, Lin Liu, Shijie Xu, Zhonglin Lu, Greta S Mok, Yingwei Wang, Yi Tao, Yue Chen","doi":"10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03409-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate improvements in <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/CT image quality due to using total variation regularized expectation maximization (TVR-EM) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OS-EM) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a total of 24 patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Positron emission tomography (PET) images were reconstructed using OS-EM and TVR-EM for 2 and 3 minutes-per-bed (min/bed) acquisition. The SUV<inf>mean</inf> of a region-of-interest on the liver, image noise, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), the SUV<inf>max</inf> of the lesions and the tumour-to-background ratios (TBR) were measured and compared between the 2 methods. Subjective image qualities were evaluated by two experienced radiologists using a 5-point score scale (5-excellent, 1-poor).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 132 lesions were analyzed. The image noise in TVR-EM reconstruction groups was lower than in the OS-EM groups (all P<0.05). The SNR, SUV<inf>max</inf> of lesions and the TBR were higher for the TVR-EM reconstruction groups compared to OS-EM groups (all P<0.05). Also, the SUV<inf>max</inf> of the lesions in the TVR-EM groups increased by at least 12% compared to OS-EM 3 min/bed group. The SUV<inf>max</inf> for small (<10 mm) and large lesions (>10 mm) in the TVR-EM 2 min/bed group were significantly larger compared to the OS-EM 3 min/bed groups (all P<0.05). The highest image quality score resulted from the TVR-EM 3 min/bed group with a penalization factor of 0.25 (3.92±0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TVR-EM reduces image noise and improved the SNR, SUV<inf>max</inf> and TBR of the lesions. It also enables fast acquisition without compromising image quality compared to standard OS-EM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23069,"journal":{"name":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...","volume":" ","pages":"280-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction improves 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT image quality as compared to ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Hanxiang Liu, Lin Liu, Shijie Xu, Zhonglin Lu, Greta S Mok, Yingwei Wang, Yi Tao, Yue Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03409-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate improvements in <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/CT image quality due to using total variation regularized expectation maximization (TVR-EM) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OS-EM) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a total of 24 patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Positron emission tomography (PET) images were reconstructed using OS-EM and TVR-EM for 2 and 3 minutes-per-bed (min/bed) acquisition. The SUV<inf>mean</inf> of a region-of-interest on the liver, image noise, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), the SUV<inf>max</inf> of the lesions and the tumour-to-background ratios (TBR) were measured and compared between the 2 methods. Subjective image qualities were evaluated by two experienced radiologists using a 5-point score scale (5-excellent, 1-poor).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 132 lesions were analyzed. The image noise in TVR-EM reconstruction groups was lower than in the OS-EM groups (all P<0.05). The SNR, SUV<inf>max</inf> of lesions and the TBR were higher for the TVR-EM reconstruction groups compared to OS-EM groups (all P<0.05). Also, the SUV<inf>max</inf> of the lesions in the TVR-EM groups increased by at least 12% compared to OS-EM 3 min/bed group. The SUV<inf>max</inf> for small (<10 mm) and large lesions (>10 mm) in the TVR-EM 2 min/bed group were significantly larger compared to the OS-EM 3 min/bed groups (all P<0.05). The highest image quality score resulted from the TVR-EM 3 min/bed group with a penalization factor of 0.25 (3.92±0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TVR-EM reduces image noise and improved the SNR, SUV<inf>max</inf> and TBR of the lesions. It also enables fast acquisition without compromising image quality compared to standard OS-EM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"280-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03409-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03409-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction improves 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT image quality as compared to ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction.
Background: This study aimed to investigate improvements in 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT image quality due to using total variation regularized expectation maximization (TVR-EM) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OS-EM) reconstruction.
Methods: Data from a total of 24 patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Positron emission tomography (PET) images were reconstructed using OS-EM and TVR-EM for 2 and 3 minutes-per-bed (min/bed) acquisition. The SUVmean of a region-of-interest on the liver, image noise, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), the SUVmax of the lesions and the tumour-to-background ratios (TBR) were measured and compared between the 2 methods. Subjective image qualities were evaluated by two experienced radiologists using a 5-point score scale (5-excellent, 1-poor).
Results: In total, 132 lesions were analyzed. The image noise in TVR-EM reconstruction groups was lower than in the OS-EM groups (all P<0.05). The SNR, SUVmax of lesions and the TBR were higher for the TVR-EM reconstruction groups compared to OS-EM groups (all P<0.05). Also, the SUVmax of the lesions in the TVR-EM groups increased by at least 12% compared to OS-EM 3 min/bed group. The SUVmax for small (<10 mm) and large lesions (>10 mm) in the TVR-EM 2 min/bed group were significantly larger compared to the OS-EM 3 min/bed groups (all P<0.05). The highest image quality score resulted from the TVR-EM 3 min/bed group with a penalization factor of 0.25 (3.92±0.19).
Conclusions: TVR-EM reduces image noise and improved the SNR, SUVmax and TBR of the lesions. It also enables fast acquisition without compromising image quality compared to standard OS-EM.