蜂胶、乳清素、蜂毒素和精油化合物对肺泡芽孢杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的抑制作用。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Alessandra Aguirra Sani, Ana Flávia Marques Pereira, Alessandra Furlanetto, Débora Silva Marques de Sousa, Tatiane Baptista Zapata, Vera Lucia Mores Rall, Ary Fernandes
{"title":"蜂胶、乳清素、蜂毒素和精油化合物对肺泡芽孢杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的抑制作用。","authors":"Alessandra Aguirra Sani,&nbsp;Ana Flávia Marques Pereira,&nbsp;Alessandra Furlanetto,&nbsp;Débora Silva Marques de Sousa,&nbsp;Tatiane Baptista Zapata,&nbsp;Vera Lucia Mores Rall,&nbsp;Ary Fernandes","doi":"10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural products represent important sources of antimicrobial compounds. Propolis and compounds from essential oils comprise good examples of such substances because of their inhibitory effects on bacterial spores, including bee pathogens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) from <i>Apis mellifera</i> were prepared using different methods: double ultrasonication, double maceration and maceration associated with ultrasonication. Together with the antimicrobial peptides nisin and melittin, and compounds present in the essential oils of clove (<i>Syzygium aromaticum</i>) and cinnamon (<i>Cinnamomum zeylanicum</i>), assays were carried out on one <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> isolate and <i>Paenibacillus alvei</i> (ATCC 6344) against vegetative and sporulated forms, using the resazurin microtiter assay. Synergism with all the antimicrobials in association with tetracycline was verified by the time-kill curve method. Potassium and phosphate efflux, release of proteins and nucleic acids were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EEPs showed the same MIC, 156.25 µg/mL against <i>B. subtilis</i> and 78.12 µg/mL against <i>P. alvei</i>. The peptides showed better activities against <i>B. subtilis</i> (MIC of 12 µg/mL for melittin and 37.50 µg/mL for nisin). Antimicrobials showed similar inhibitory effects, but cinnamaldehyde (39.06 µg/mL) showed the best action against <i>P. alvei</i>. Melittin and nisin showed the greatest capacity to reduce spores, regarding <i>B. subtilis</i> there was a 100% reduction at 6.25 and 0.78 µg/mL, respectively. Concerning <i>P. alvei</i>, the reduction was 93 and 98% at concentrations of 80 µg/mL of melittin and 15 µg/mL of nisin. EEPs showed the highest effects on the protein release against <i>B. subtilis</i> and <i>P. alvei</i>. Nucleic acid release, phosphate and potassium efflux assays indicated bacterial cell membrane damage. Synergism between antimicrobials and tetracycline was demonstrated against both bacteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All antimicrobials tested showed antibacterial activities against vegetative and sporulated forms of <i>P. alvei</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i>, especially nisin and melittin. Synergism with tetracycline and damage on bacterial cell membrane also occurred.</p>","PeriodicalId":17565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhibitory activities of propolis, nisin, melittin and essential oil compounds on <i>Paenibacillus alvei</i> and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Aguirra Sani,&nbsp;Ana Flávia Marques Pereira,&nbsp;Alessandra Furlanetto,&nbsp;Débora Silva Marques de Sousa,&nbsp;Tatiane Baptista Zapata,&nbsp;Vera Lucia Mores Rall,&nbsp;Ary Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2022-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Natural products represent important sources of antimicrobial compounds. Propolis and compounds from essential oils comprise good examples of such substances because of their inhibitory effects on bacterial spores, including bee pathogens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) from <i>Apis mellifera</i> were prepared using different methods: double ultrasonication, double maceration and maceration associated with ultrasonication. Together with the antimicrobial peptides nisin and melittin, and compounds present in the essential oils of clove (<i>Syzygium aromaticum</i>) and cinnamon (<i>Cinnamomum zeylanicum</i>), assays were carried out on one <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> isolate and <i>Paenibacillus alvei</i> (ATCC 6344) against vegetative and sporulated forms, using the resazurin microtiter assay. Synergism with all the antimicrobials in association with tetracycline was verified by the time-kill curve method. Potassium and phosphate efflux, release of proteins and nucleic acids were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EEPs showed the same MIC, 156.25 µg/mL against <i>B. subtilis</i> and 78.12 µg/mL against <i>P. alvei</i>. The peptides showed better activities against <i>B. subtilis</i> (MIC of 12 µg/mL for melittin and 37.50 µg/mL for nisin). Antimicrobials showed similar inhibitory effects, but cinnamaldehyde (39.06 µg/mL) showed the best action against <i>P. alvei</i>. Melittin and nisin showed the greatest capacity to reduce spores, regarding <i>B. subtilis</i> there was a 100% reduction at 6.25 and 0.78 µg/mL, respectively. Concerning <i>P. alvei</i>, the reduction was 93 and 98% at concentrations of 80 µg/mL of melittin and 15 µg/mL of nisin. EEPs showed the highest effects on the protein release against <i>B. subtilis</i> and <i>P. alvei</i>. Nucleic acid release, phosphate and potassium efflux assays indicated bacterial cell membrane damage. Synergism between antimicrobials and tetracycline was demonstrated against both bacteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All antimicrobials tested showed antibacterial activities against vegetative and sporulated forms of <i>P. alvei</i> and <i>B. subtilis</i>, especially nisin and melittin. Synergism with tetracycline and damage on bacterial cell membrane also occurred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2022-0025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-2022-0025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:天然产物是抗菌化合物的重要来源。蜂胶和从精油中提取的化合物就是这类物质的好例子,因为它们对细菌孢子有抑制作用,包括蜜蜂病原体。方法:采用双超声法、双浸渍法和超声联合浸渍法制备蜜蜂蜂胶乙醇提取物。结合抗菌肽nisin和melittin,以及丁香(Syzygium aromaticum)和肉桂(Cinnamomum zeylanicum)精油中存在的化合物,使用resazurin微滴法对一种枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis)分离物和一种芽孢杆菌(Paenibacillus alvei) (ATCC 6344)的营养和孢子形式进行了测定。时间杀伤曲线法验证了其与所有与四环素相关的抗菌素的协同作用。研究了钾和磷酸盐的外排、蛋白质和核酸的释放。结果:EEPs对枯草芽孢杆菌的MIC为156.25µg/mL,对肺泡芽孢杆菌的MIC为78.12µg/mL。该肽对枯草芽孢杆菌的抑菌活性较好(对蜂毒素的MIC为12µg/mL,对乳酸链球菌素的MIC为37.50µg/mL)。抗菌药物对肺泡假单胞菌的抑制效果相似,但肉桂醛(39.06µg/mL)对肺泡假单胞菌的抑制效果最好。蜂毒素和nisin对枯草芽孢杆菌的还原能力最强,分别为6.25和0.78µg/mL,还原率为100%。在蜂毒素浓度为80µg/mL和nisin浓度为15µg/mL时,肺泡假单胞菌的致病性分别降低了93%和98%。EEPs对枯草芽孢杆菌和肺泡芽孢杆菌的蛋白释放效果最好。核酸释放、磷酸盐和钾外排测定显示细菌细胞膜损伤。抗菌剂和四环素对这两种细菌都有协同作用。结论:所有抗菌药物对肺泡假单胞菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的营养型和孢子型均有明显的抑菌活性,其中以nisin和melittin的抑菌活性最强。与四环素的协同作用和对细菌细胞膜的损伤也发生了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inhibitory activities of propolis, nisin, melittin and essential oil compounds on <i>Paenibacillus alvei</i> and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>.

Inhibitory activities of propolis, nisin, melittin and essential oil compounds on <i>Paenibacillus alvei</i> and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>.

Inhibitory activities of propolis, nisin, melittin and essential oil compounds on <i>Paenibacillus alvei</i> and <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>.

Inhibitory activities of propolis, nisin, melittin and essential oil compounds on Paenibacillus alvei and Bacillus subtilis.

Background: Natural products represent important sources of antimicrobial compounds. Propolis and compounds from essential oils comprise good examples of such substances because of their inhibitory effects on bacterial spores, including bee pathogens.

Methods: Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) from Apis mellifera were prepared using different methods: double ultrasonication, double maceration and maceration associated with ultrasonication. Together with the antimicrobial peptides nisin and melittin, and compounds present in the essential oils of clove (Syzygium aromaticum) and cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), assays were carried out on one Bacillus subtilis isolate and Paenibacillus alvei (ATCC 6344) against vegetative and sporulated forms, using the resazurin microtiter assay. Synergism with all the antimicrobials in association with tetracycline was verified by the time-kill curve method. Potassium and phosphate efflux, release of proteins and nucleic acids were investigated.

Results: EEPs showed the same MIC, 156.25 µg/mL against B. subtilis and 78.12 µg/mL against P. alvei. The peptides showed better activities against B. subtilis (MIC of 12 µg/mL for melittin and 37.50 µg/mL for nisin). Antimicrobials showed similar inhibitory effects, but cinnamaldehyde (39.06 µg/mL) showed the best action against P. alvei. Melittin and nisin showed the greatest capacity to reduce spores, regarding B. subtilis there was a 100% reduction at 6.25 and 0.78 µg/mL, respectively. Concerning P. alvei, the reduction was 93 and 98% at concentrations of 80 µg/mL of melittin and 15 µg/mL of nisin. EEPs showed the highest effects on the protein release against B. subtilis and P. alvei. Nucleic acid release, phosphate and potassium efflux assays indicated bacterial cell membrane damage. Synergism between antimicrobials and tetracycline was demonstrated against both bacteria.

Conclusion: All antimicrobials tested showed antibacterial activities against vegetative and sporulated forms of P. alvei and B. subtilis, especially nisin and melittin. Synergism with tetracycline and damage on bacterial cell membrane also occurred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases (JVATiTD) is a non-commercial academic open access publication dedicated to research on all aspects of toxinology, venomous animals and tropical diseases. Its interdisciplinary content includes original scientific articles covering research on toxins derived from animals, plants and microorganisms. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:systematics and morphology of venomous animals;physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology and immunology of toxins;epidemiology, clinical aspects and treatment of envenoming by different animals, plants and microorganisms;development and evaluation of antivenoms and toxin-derivative products;epidemiology, clinical aspects and treatment of tropical diseases (caused by virus, bacteria, algae, fungi and parasites) including the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) defined by the World Health Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信